Literature DB >> 20150905

Interchangeability of ciclosporin formulations in stable adult renal transplant recipients: comparison of Equoral and Neoral capsules in an international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial.

Stefan Vítko1, Marek Ferkl.   

Abstract

The cost of immunosuppression following transplantation can be reduced by using generic ciclosporin (for example, Equoral) rather than innovator ciclosporin drugs such as Neoral. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the interchangeability, safety, and tolerability of Equoral, a generic ciclosporin, with Neoral in stable adult renal transplant recipients. This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial in stable renal transplant patients, comparing 6 months of treatment with Equoral with the same treatment period on Neoral. The primary end point was the between-treatment comparison of the total daily ciclosporin dose at the end of the study. A total of 99 patients were enrolled and constituted the full analysis/safety population, and 78 patients forming the per-protocol population were assessed for efficacy. Equoral was found to be equivalent to Neoral with regard to the primary end point of daily dose at the end of the study. This was supported by comparable serum ciclosporin levels at the end of the study. There were no renal transplant rejection incidents, but there was one death (in the Neoral group). Drug tolerability and incidence of adverse events were comparable between the treatment groups. In conclusion, Equoral and Neoral are interchangeable in stable renal transplant patients, and both drugs are associated with a similar safety and tolerability profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20150905     DOI: 10.1038/ki.2009.506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl        ISSN: 0098-6577            Impact factor:   10.545


  6 in total

1.  Therapeutic monitoring of pediatric renal transplant patients with conversion to generic cyclosporin.

Authors:  Natalia Riva; Paulo Caceres Guido; Juan Ibañez; Nieves Licciardone; Marcela Rousseau; Gabriel Mato; Marta Monteverde; Paula Schaiquevich
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-05-27

2.  Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Gere Sunder-Plassmann; Petra Reinke; Thomas Rath; Andrzej Wiecek; Michal Nowicki; Richard Moore; Jens Lutz; Martina Gaggl; Marek Ferkl
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.782

3.  Cyclosporine: A Commentary on Brand versus Generic Formulation Exchange.

Authors:  A K Singh; S S Narsipur
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2011-11-17

Review 4.  Bioavailability, Efficacy and Safety of Generic Immunosuppressive Drugs for Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Evangelos Tsipotis; Navin R Gupta; Gowri Raman; Elias Zintzaras; Bertrand L Jaber
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.605

Review 5.  Generic immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amber O Molnar; Dean Fergusson; Anne K Tsampalieros; Alexandria Bennett; Nicholas Fergusson; Timothy Ramsay; Greg A Knoll
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-06-22

6.  Conversion to generic cyclosporine A in stable chronic patients after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Maximilian Kraeuter; Matthias Helmschrott; Christian Erbel; Christian A Gleissner; Lutz Frankenstein; Bastian Schmack; Arjang Ruhparwar; Philipp Ehlermann; Hugo A Katus; Andreas O Doesch
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.162

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.