Literature DB >> 20150324

Bivalirudin vs. unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris: 1-year results of the ISAR-REACT 3 trial.

Stefanie Schulz1, Julinda Mehilli, Gjin Ndrepepa, Franz-Josef Neumann, Katrin A Birkmeier, Sebastian Kufner, Gert Richardt, Peter B Berger, Albert Schömig, Adnan Kastrati.   

Abstract

AIMS: In ISAR-REACT 3, 30-day outcomes in 4570 biomarker negative patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) > or =2 h after pre-treatment with 600 mg of clopidogrel revealed less bleeding with bivalirudin compared with unfractionated heparin, but no difference in 30-day net clinical benefit. The objective of the present analysis was to assess the impact of bivalirudin vs. heparin on 1-year outcomes in ISAR-REACT 3. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The primary outcome for this analysis was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization 1 year after randomization. The composite of death or myocardial infarction was a secondary outcome. At 1 year, the primary outcome occurred in 17.1% of patients assigned to bivalirudin vs. 17.5% assigned to heparin [hazard ratio (HR), 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.86-1.13; P = 0.816]. The combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction was 7.7% in the bivalirudin group vs. 6.7% in the heparin group (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.93-1.43; P = 0.200). The mortality rate was 1.9% in the bivalirudin group and 1.7% in the heparin group (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.71-1.70; P = 0.667). At 1 year, no significant differences in the primary outcome were observed with bivalirudin and heparin in any of the subgroups analysed.
CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin and unfractionated heparin during PCI provide comparable outcomes at 1 year in biomarker negative patients undergoing PCI after pre-treatment with 600 mg of clopidogrel. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: URL www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier NCT00262054.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20150324     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  19 in total

Review 1.  Which antithrombin for whom? Identifying the patient population that benefits most from novel antithrombin agents.

Authors:  David A Burke; Haider J Warraich; Duane S Pinto
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Incorporating linked healthcare claims to improve confounding control in a study of in-hospital medication use.

Authors:  Jessica M Franklin; Wesley Eddings; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Jeremy A Rassen
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Risk guided use of the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin: insights from recent trials and analyses.

Authors:  William B Hillegass; Gregory S Bradford
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  A systematic review of the quality of economic models comparing thrombosis inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Maximilian H M Hatz; Reiner Leidl; Nichola A Yates; Björn Stollenwerk
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  The impact of unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin on patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Fabio V Lima; Luis Gruberg; Usman Aslam; Melissa Ramgadoo; Kydanis Clase; Alessandra Trevisan; Allen Jeremias
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Bleeding avoidance strategies. Consensus and controversy.

Authors:  Harold L Dauerman; Sunil V Rao; Frederic S Resnic; Robert J Applegate
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Bivalirudin: a pharmacoeconomic profile of its use in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Comparison of bivalirudin and radial access across a spectrum of preprocedural risk of bleeding in percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the national cardiovascular data registry.

Authors:  Dmitri V Baklanov; Sunghee Kim; Steven P Marso; Sumeet Subherwal; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 6.546

9.  Validation of long-term benefits of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in routine clinical practice after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Venkatesan D Vidi; Michael E Matheny; Vikram Agarwal; Nipun Arora; Sharon Donnelly; Sripal Bangalore; Frederic S Resnic
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Bivalirudin versus heparin in percutaneous coronary intervention-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials stratified by adjunctive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa strategy.

Authors:  Mahesh Anantha-Narayanan; Dixitha Anugula; Nagarjuna R Gujjula; Yogesh N V Reddy; Janani Baskaran; Manu Kaushik; Venkata M Alla; Ganesh Raveendran
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.