UNLABELLED: Regular therapy with the radiolabeled somatostatin analog (177)Lu-octreotate (22.2-29.6 GBq) in patients with gastroenteropancreatic or bronchial neuroendocrine tumors results in tumor remission in 46% of patients, including minor response. We present the effects of additional therapy with (177)Lu-octreotate in patients in whom progressive disease developed after an initial benefit from regular therapy. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with progressive disease after an initial radiologic or clinical response were treated with additional cycles of (177)Lu-octreotate. The intended cumulative dose of additional therapy was 14.8 GBq in 2 cycles. Responses were evaluated using Southwest Oncology Group criteria, including minor response (tumor size reduction of >or=25% and <50%). RESULTS: Median time to progression (TTP) after regular therapy was 27 mo. In 4 patients, the intended cumulative dose was not achieved (2 had progressive disease, 2 had long-lasting thrombocytopenia). Hematologic toxicity grade 3 was observed in 4 patients, and grade 4, in 1. The median follow-up time was 16 mo (range, 1-40 mo). No kidney failure or myelodysplastic syndrome was observed. Renewed tumor regression was observed in 8 patients (2 partial remission, 6 minor response), and 8 patients had stable disease. Median TTP was 17 mo. Treatment outcome was less favorable in patients with a short TTP after regular cycles. Treatment effects in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were similar to those in patients with other gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. CONCLUSION: Most patients tolerated additional cycles with (177)Lu-octreotate well. None developed serious delayed adverse events. Additional cycles with (177)Lu-octreotate can have antitumor effects, but effects were less than for the regular cycles. This may be because of a worse clinical condition, more extensive tumor burden, or changed tumor characteristics. We conclude that this salvage therapy can be effective and is safe.
UNLABELLED: Regular therapy with the radiolabeled somatostatin analog (177)Lu-octreotate (22.2-29.6 GBq) in patients with gastroenteropancreatic or bronchial neuroendocrine tumors results in tumor remission in 46% of patients, including minor response. We present the effects of additional therapy with (177)Lu-octreotate in patients in whom progressive disease developed after an initial benefit from regular therapy. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with progressive disease after an initial radiologic or clinical response were treated with additional cycles of (177)Lu-octreotate. The intended cumulative dose of additional therapy was 14.8 GBq in 2 cycles. Responses were evaluated using Southwest Oncology Group criteria, including minor response (tumor size reduction of >or=25% and <50%). RESULTS: Median time to progression (TTP) after regular therapy was 27 mo. In 4 patients, the intended cumulative dose was not achieved (2 had progressive disease, 2 had long-lasting thrombocytopenia). Hematologic toxicity grade 3 was observed in 4 patients, and grade 4, in 1. The median follow-up time was 16 mo (range, 1-40 mo). No kidney failure or myelodysplastic syndrome was observed. Renewed tumor regression was observed in 8 patients (2 partial remission, 6 minor response), and 8 patients had stable disease. Median TTP was 17 mo. Treatment outcome was less favorable in patients with a short TTP after regular cycles. Treatment effects in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were similar to those in patients with other gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. CONCLUSION: Most patients tolerated additional cycles with (177)Lu-octreotate well. None developed serious delayed adverse events. Additional cycles with (177)Lu-octreotate can have antitumor effects, but effects were less than for the regular cycles. This may be because of a worse clinical condition, more extensive tumor burden, or changed tumor characteristics. We conclude that this salvage therapy can be effective and is safe.
Authors: Sander M Bison; Mark W Konijnenberg; Marleen Melis; Stefan E Pool; Monique R Bernsen; Jaap J M Teunissen; Dik J Kwekkeboom; Marion de Jong Journal: Clin Transl Imaging Date: 2014-03-05
Authors: Lisa Bodei; Marta Cremonesi; Chiara M Grana; Marco Chinol; Silvia M Baio; Stefano Severi; Giovanni Paganelli Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Anna Yordanova; Karin Mayer; Peter Brossart; Maria A Gonzalez-Carmona; Christian P Strassburg; Markus Essler; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Bryson W Katona; Giorgio A Roccaro; Michael C Soulen; Yu-Xiao Yang; Bonita J Bennett; Brian P Riff; Rebecca A Glynn; Damian Wild; Guillaume P Nicolas; Daniel A Pryma; Ursina R Teitelbaum; David C Metz Journal: Pancreas Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Madhav Danthala; K G Kallur; G R Prashant; K Rajkumar; M Raghavendra Rao Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Giuseppe Lo Russo; Sara Pusceddu; Natalie Prinzi; Martina Imbimbo; Claudia Proto; Diego Signorelli; Milena Vitali; Monica Ganzinelli; Marco Maccauro; Roberto Buzzoni; Ettore Seregni; Filippo de Braud; Marina Chiara Garassino Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2016-07-27