Literature DB >> 20150227

Pain following 980-nm endovenous laser ablation and segmental radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins: a prospective observational study.

Amanda C Shepherd1, Manj S Gohel, Chung S Lim, Maher Hamish, Alun H Davies.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative pain following endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and identify risk factors for increased pain.
METHODS: Patients undergoing either segmental RFA (VNUS Closure Fast, VNUS Medical Technologies, San Jose, California) or EVLA (980 nm) for varicose veins completed a preoperative disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire (Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire [AVVQ]) and a diary card recording postoperative pain, return to normal activities, and return to work. Median 3- and 10-day pain scores were calculated.
RESULTS: In all, 81 patients returned diary cards (RFA = 45, EVLA = 36). Patients receiving RFA reported less postoperative pain than those receiving EVLA at 3 days (14.5 vs 25.8 mm, P = .053, Mann-Whitney U test) and 10 days (13 vs 23.3 mm, P = .014, Mann-Whitney U test) and returned to work earlier than those receiving EVLA (median 5 vs 9 days, P = .022).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with segmental RFA had less postoperative pain and returned to work quicker than those treated with EVLA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20150227     DOI: 10.1177/1538574409359337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg        ISSN: 1538-5744            Impact factor:   1.089


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of Endovenous Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Varices in the Same Patient.

Authors:  Orhan Bozoglan; Bulent Mese; Erdinc Eroglu; Hasan Cetin Ekerbiçer; Alptekin Yasim
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-01-08

Review 2.  Minimally invasive treatments for perforator vein insufficiency.

Authors:  Gokhan Kuyumcu; Gloria Maria Salazar; Anand M Prabhakar; Suvranu Ganguli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-12

3.  Endovascular radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2011-02-01

Review 4.  Is radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins a valuable option? A systematic review of the literature with a cost analysis.

Authors:  Thomas G Poder; Jean-François Fisette; Suzanne K Bédard; Marc-Antoine Despatis
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  ClariVein® - Early results from a large single-centre series of mechanochemical endovenous ablation for varicose veins.

Authors:  T Y Tang; J W Kam; M E Gaunt
Journal:  Phlebology       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 1.740

6.  CASS (CyanoAcrylate closure versus Surgical Stripping for incompetent saphenous veins) study: a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes after cyanoacrylate closure and surgical stripping for the treatment of incompetent saphenous veins.

Authors:  Sungsin Cho; Hyung Sub Park; Taeseung Lee; Seung Jae Byun; Woo-Sung Yun; Shin-Seok Yang; Hyangkyoung Kim; Woo-Shik Kim; Jin Hyun Joh; In Mok Jung
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Mechanochemical endovenous Ablation versus RADiOfrequeNcy Ablation in the treatment of primary great saphenous vein incompetence (MARADONA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ramon R J P van Eekeren; Doeke Boersma; Suzanne Holewijn; Anco Vahl; Jean Paul p m de Vries; Clark J Zeebregts; Michel M P J Reijnen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.