Literature DB >> 20149864

"Tissue-repairing" blood-derived macrophages are essential for healing of the injured spinal cord: from skin-activated macrophages to infiltrating blood-derived cells?

Michal Schwartz1.   

Abstract

Until recently, the local inflammation that occurs in response to spinal cord injury has received a negative reputation; overall, it was assumed to be one of the major causes of a vicious neurotoxic cycle that leads to impaired recovery following injury. This local inflammation involves both the activated tissue-resident microglia and monocyte-derived macrophages infiltrating from the blood. Ten years ago, we proposed that the blood-derived macrophages, reminiscent of "alternatively activated" macrophages (also known as tissue repairing, M2), are not spontaneously recruited in sufficient numbers to sites of injured central nervous system (CNS). We further demonstrated that their exogenous administration to the margins of injured spinal cord improved functional outcome. However, our suggestions evoked criticism, claiming that we were adding macrophages to a site that is already overwhelmed with inflammatory cells. Using experimental paradigms that enabled functional distinction between the resident and infiltrating cells, our most recent studies further corroborated our repair perception, showing that (a) infiltrating monocyte-derived macrophages are recruited following injury and localize to the margins of the lesion, unlike the activated resident microglia that are not compartmentalized, and (b) activated resident microglia and infiltrating monocyte-derived macrophages perform distinct roles; recruited blood-derived macrophages display an (IL-10-dependent) anti-inflammatory phenotype when they become co-localized with the glial scar. We further found that post-injury recruitment of blood monocytes is indeed suboptimal. Augmentation of the levels of naïve blood monocytes leads to their increased recruitment to the same zones that are the targets of the infiltrated endogenous monocytes, and they acquire the same anti-inflammatory activity, leading to improved recovery. Thus, boosting the levels of the relevant blood monocytes reinforces the body's own repair mechanisms that, for reasons that are currently under investigation, are not optimally triggered within the critical post-injury period.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20149864     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Immun        ISSN: 0889-1591            Impact factor:   7.217


  35 in total

1.  Nanoparticle-Delivered IRF5 siRNA Facilitates M1 to M2 Transition, Reduces Demyelination and Neurofilament Loss, and Promotes Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury in Mice.

Authors:  Jun Li; Yanbin Liu; Haidong Xu; Qiang Fu
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.092

2.  IL-10 deficiency exacerbates the brain inflammatory response to permanent ischemia without preventing resolution of the lesion.

Authors:  Isabel Pérez-de Puig; Francesc Miró; Angélica Salas-Perdomo; Ester Bonfill-Teixidor; Maura Ferrer-Ferrer; Leonardo Márquez-Kisinousky; Anna M Planas
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  In vivo implanted bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells trigger a cascade of cellular events leading to the formation of an ectopic bone regenerative niche.

Authors:  Roberta Tasso; Valentina Ulivi; Daniele Reverberi; Claudia Lo Sicco; Fiorella Descalzi; Ranieri Cancedda
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 4.  Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; Buddy D Ratner; Stuart B Goodman; Salomon Amar; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  MFG-E8 Selectively Inhibited Aβ-Induced Microglial M1 Polarization via NF-κB and PI3K-Akt Pathways.

Authors:  Xiaolei Shi; Xiaoying Cai; Wei Di; Jie Li; Xiaotian Xu; Aiwu Zhang; Weiwei Qi; Zhiming Zhou; Yannan Fang
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 6.  Dealing with Danger in the CNS: The Response of the Immune System to Injury.

Authors:  Sachin P Gadani; James T Walsh; John R Lukens; Jonathan Kipnis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells promotes an alternative pathway of macrophage activation and functional recovery after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Hideaki Nakajima; Kenzo Uchida; Alexander Rodriguez Guerrero; Shuji Watanabe; Daisuke Sugita; Naoto Takeura; Ai Yoshida; Guang Long; Karina T Wright; William E B Johnson; Hisatoshi Baba
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Glial innate immunity generated by non-aggregated alpha-synuclein in mouse: differences between wild-type and Parkinson's disease-linked mutants.

Authors:  Cintia Roodveldt; Adahir Labrador-Garrido; Elena Gonzalez-Rey; Rafael Fernandez-Montesinos; Marta Caro; Christian C Lachaud; Christopher A Waudby; Mario Delgado; Christopher M Dobson; David Pozo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effect of an inductive hydrogel composed of urinary bladder matrix upon functional recovery following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ling Zhang; Feng Zhang; Zhongfang Weng; Bryan N Brown; Hongqu Yan; Xiecheng Michelle Ma; Peter S Vosler; Stephen F Badylak; C Edward Dixon; Xinyan Tracy Cui; Jun Chen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 10.  The role of microglia in brain maintenance: implications for Rett syndrome.

Authors:  Noël C Derecki; James C Cronk; Jonathan Kipnis
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 16.687

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.