Literature DB >> 20149555

Could stroma contribute to field cancerization?

Lin Ge1, Wenxia Meng, Hongmei Zhou, Neil Bhowmick.   

Abstract

The common oral diseases as well as oral cancer have the characteristic of field cancerization or field effect. Field cancerization, characterized by phenotypic and genetic changes in the neighboring cells of the frank cancer cells, is a clinical phenomenon first found in head and neck cancers. Field cancerization of the epithelia is currently a widely-accepted model in cancer biology as a manifestation of cancer progression. The concomitant changes in the tumor microenvironment have drawn more attention recently. Could the changes in the tumor microenvironment and the epithelial field cancerization concepts be linked? In view of the importance of stroma in the development of epithelium and evidence in carcinoma-associated stroma, we propose the question if stroma not only reciprocates the neoplastic changes of the epithelia, but also contributes to field cancerization. Actually one perspective paper pointed out that healing wound can influence the recurrence of field cancerization. In another words, the microenvironment of healing wound determines the prognosis of field cancerization. Based on the literatures published and our own work, we hypothesize a new model of field cancerization focusing on the co-evolution of the tumor microenvironment. We suggest that the microenvironment cannot be neglected when treating diseases with characteristics of field cancerization. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20149555     DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2010.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Hypotheses        ISSN: 0306-9877            Impact factor:   1.538


  14 in total

1.  Microenvironmental genomic alterations reveal signaling networks for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Gurkan Bebek; Mohammed Orloff; Charis Eng
Journal:  J Clin Bioinforma       Date:  2011-08-02

2.  Role of stromal-epithelial interaction in the formation and development of cancer cells.

Authors:  Viktor Shtilbans
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2013-02-22

Review 3.  Etiologic field effect: reappraisal of the field effect concept in cancer predisposition and progression.

Authors:  Paul Lochhead; Andrew T Chan; Reiko Nishihara; Charles S Fuchs; Andrew H Beck; Edward Giovannucci; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Oxidative stress in cancer associated fibroblasts drives tumor-stroma co-evolution: A new paradigm for understanding tumor metabolism, the field effect and genomic instability in cancer cells.

Authors:  Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Renee M Balliet; Dayana B Rivadeneira; Barbara Chiavarina; Stephanos Pavlides; Chenguang Wang; Diana Whitaker-Menezes; Kristin M Daumer; Zhao Lin; Agnieszka K Witkiewicz; Neal Flomenberg; Anthony Howell; Richard G Pestell; Erik S Knudsen; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 5.  The matrix in cancer.

Authors:  Thomas R Cox
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Markers of fibrosis and epithelial to mesenchymal transition demonstrate field cancerization in histologically normal tissue adjacent to breast tumors.

Authors:  Kristina A Trujillo; Christopher M Heaphy; Minh Mai; Keith M Vargas; Anna C Jones; Phung Vo; Kimberly S Butler; Nancy E Joste; Marco Bisoffi; Jeffrey K Griffith
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 7.  Oral field cancerization: current evidence and future perspectives.

Authors:  Punnya V Angadi; J K Savitha; Sanjay S Rao; Y Sivaranjini
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-02-22

Review 8.  Decellularized normal and cancer tissues as tools for cancer research.

Authors:  E Gentilin; E D'Angelo; M Agostini; L Astolfi
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 5.854

9.  Spatially resolved optical and ultrastructural properties of colorectal and pancreatic field carcinogenesis observed by inverse spectroscopic optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Ji Yi; Andrew J Radosevich; Yolanda Stypula-Cyrus; Nikhil N Mutyal; Samira Michelle Azarin; Elizabeth Horcher; Michael J Goldberg; Laura K Bianchi; Shailesh Bajaj; Hemant K Roy; Vadim Backman
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Myofibroblast-derived SFRP1 as potential inhibitor of colorectal carcinoma field effect.

Authors:  Gábor Valcz; Arpád V Patai; Alexandra Kalmár; Bálint Péterfia; István Fűri; Barnabás Wichmann; Györgyi Műzes; Ferenc Sipos; Tibor Krenács; Emese Mihály; Sándor Spisák; Béla Molnár; Zsolt Tulassay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.