Literature DB >> 20148959

Mate choice for nonadditive genetic benefits correlate with MHC dissimilarity in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus).

Muna Agbali1, Martin Reichard, Anna Bryjová, Josef Bryja, Carl Smith.   

Abstract

Good genes models of mate choice predict additive genetic benefits of choice whereas the compatibility hypothesis predicts nonadditive fitness benefits. Here the Chinese rose bitterling, Rhodeus ocellatus, a freshwater fish with a resource-based mating system, was used to separate additive and nonadditive genetic benefits of female mate choice. A sequential blocked mating design was used to test female mate preferences, and a cross-classified breeding design coupled with in vitro fertilizations for fitness benefits of mate choice. In addition, the offspring produced by the pairing of preferred and nonpreferred males were reared to maturity and their fitness traits were compared. Finally, the MHC DAB1 gene was typed and male MHC genotypes were correlated with female mate choice. Females showed significant mate preferences but preferences were not congruent among females. There was a significant interaction of male and female genotype on offspring survival, rate of development, growth rate, and body size. No significant male additive effects on offspring fitness were observed. Female mate preferences corresponded with male genetic compatibility, which correlated with MHC dissimilarity. It is proposed that in the rose bitterling genetic compatibility is the mechanism by which females obtain a fitness benefit through mate choice and that male MHC dissimilarity, likely mediated by odor cues, indicates genetic compatibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20148959     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00961.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  25 in total

1.  MHC-mediated spatial distribution in brown trout (Salmo trutta) fry.

Authors:  B O'Farrell; J A H Benzie; P McGinnity; J Carlsson; E de Eyto; E Dillane; C Graham; J Coughlan; T Cross
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  A sex-specific trade-off between mating preferences for genetic compatibility and body size in a cichlid fish with mutual mate choice.

Authors:  Timo Thünken; Denis Meuthen; Theo C M Bakker; Sebastian A Baldauf
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Cognitive ability is heritable and predicts the success of an alternative mating tactic.

Authors:  Carl Smith; André Philips; Martin Reichard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Social discrimination by quantitative assessment of immunogenetic similarity.

Authors:  Jandouwe Villinger; Bruce Waldman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Social and extra-pair mating in relation to major histocompatibility complex variation in common yellowthroats.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bollmer; Peter O Dunn; Corey R Freeman-Gallant; Linda A Whittingham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Chemically moderated gamete preferences predict offspring fitness in a broadcast spawning invertebrate.

Authors:  Mathew Oliver; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Lack of evidence for selection favouring MHC haplotypes that combine high functional diversity.

Authors:  Arnaud Gaigher; Alexandre Roulin; Walid H Gharib; Pierre Taberlet; Reto Burri; Luca Fumagalli
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Mating preferences can drive expansion or contraction of major histocompatibility complex gene family.

Authors:  Piotr Bentkowski; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Structure, diversity and evolutionary patterns of expressed MHC class IIB genes in chub (Squalius cephalus), a cyprinid fish species from Europe.

Authors:  Mária Seifertová; Andrea Simková
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.846

10.  Gene duplication and divergence produce divergent MHC genotypes without disassortative mating.

Authors:  Donald C Dearborn; Andrea B Gager; Andrew G McArthur; Morgan E Gilmour; Elena Mandzhukova; Robert A Mauck
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 6.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.