Literature DB >> 20148601

New diabetes HEDIS blood pressure quality measure: potential for overtreatment.

Hae Mi Choe1, Steven J Bernstein, Connie J Standiford, Rodney A Hayward.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine reasons for failing to meet the new Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) blood pressure (BP) measure for diabetes patients (BP <130/80 mm Hg), which may not accurately identify poor-quality care and could promote overtreatment through its performance incentives. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
METHODS: We formed 2 cohorts of diabetes patients in 9 general medicine clinics in an academic healthcare system. Cohort A (n = 124) failed the new HEDIS measure but passed the old measure (systolic blood pressure [SBP] 130-139 and diastolic blood pressure [DBP] <90 mm Hg; or SBP <140 and DBP 80-89 mm Hg). Cohort B (n = 125) failed the old measure (SBP > or = 140 and/ or DBP > or = 90). We reviewed medical records to ascertain clinician response to elevated BP.
RESULTS: Physicians documented treatment changes in only 4% and 28% of cohort A and B patients, respectively. Refractory systolic hypertension was common in those aged > or = 65 years; 60% of those in cohort B and 58% in cohort A took 3 or more antihypertensive medications and/or had a diastolic BP below 70 mm Hg.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified a substantial cohort of elderly diabetes patients with DBP <70 mm Hg who were on 3 medications at adequate doses, but who did not meet the current performance measurement criteria (140/90 or 130/80 mm Hg). We suggest that such patients be excluded from performance measures, or if included, be noted for special attention by clinicians to balance intensification with risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20148601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  7 in total

1.  Monitoring performance for blood pressure management among patients with diabetes mellitus: too much of a good thing?

Authors:  Eve A Kerr; Michelle A Lucatorto; Rob Holleman; Mary M Hogan; Mandi L Klamerus; Timothy P Hofer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-25

2.  A report card on provider report cards: current status of the health care transparency movement.

Authors:  Jon B Christianson; Karen M Volmar; Jeffrey Alexander; Dennis P Scanlon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Treating chronically ill people with diabetes mellitus with limited life expectancy: implications for performance measurement.

Authors:  LeChauncy D Woodard; Cassie R Landrum; Tracy H Urech; Jochen Profit; Salim S Virani; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Changing Diagnostic and Treatment Criteria for Chronic Illness: A Critical Consideration of their Impact on Low-Income Hispanic Patients.

Authors:  Linda M Hunt; Meta Kreiner; Fredy Rodriguez-Mejia
Journal:  Hum Organ       Date:  2013

5.  The changing face of chronic illness management in primary care: a qualitative study of underlying influences and unintended outcomes.

Authors:  Linda M Hunt; Meta Kreiner; Howard Brody
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  The pursuit of preventive care for chronic illness: turning healthy people into chronic patients.

Authors:  Meta J Kreiner; Linda M Hunt
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2013-12-28

7.  Diabetes performance measures: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Patrick J O'Connor; Noni L Bodkin; Judith Fradkin; Russell E Glasgow; Sheldon Greenfield; Edward Gregg; Eve A Kerr; L Gregory Pawlson; Joseph V Selby; John E Sutherland; Michael L Taylor; Carol H Wysham
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 19.112

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.