Literature DB >> 20148348

Escalating weekly doses of cetuximab and correlation with skin toxicity: a phase I study.

Cheryl Ho1, Randeep Sangha, Laurel Beckett, Michael Tanaka, Derick H Lau, Daniel B Eisen, Rachel A Burich, Paul Luciw, Imran Khan, Philip C Mack, David R Gandara, Angela M Davies.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cetuximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The recommended dosage is an initial load of 400 mg/m² intravenously (IV) followed by a weekly maintenance dose of 250 mg/m². It has been reported retrospectively that cetuximab efficacy was correlated with dose-related severity of skin rash. This study was prospectively designed to examine the safety and feasibility of escalating weekly doses of cetuximab, testing the hypothesis of the relationship of dose-dependent skin toxicity and efficacy. Methods Four dose levels were tested: Cetuximab 400 mg/m² IV loading dose and 250, 300, 350, 400 mg/m² weekly IV maintenance. There was no intra-patient dose escalation. Standard dose limiting toxicity criteria were used. Rash was evaluated using two additional validated dermatology methods: global acne grading scale (GAGS) and acne lesion counting (ALC). Tumor specimens and blood samples were obtained for correlative analyses.
RESULTS: Twenty seven patients with solid tumors were enrolled: five head and neck, three pancreas, four gall bladder, two each of prostate, breast, colorectal, lung, and esophagus, and five others. Planned dose escalation was completed without reaching dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The highest dose level was expanded to a total of 17 patients. Gr 3/4 toxicities included: lymphopenia (2), fatigue (2), and hypomagnesemia (2). One patient experienced a grade 3 rash (350 mg/m²). Sixty five percent of pts had a ≥ Gr 2 rash that was not dose dependent. In 22 evaluable patients, there was one partial response (PR) in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma (400 mg/m²) and seven patients had stable disease (SD). ALC and GAGS demonstrated no correlation with dose or response. Correlative studies evaluating k-ras, EGFR FISH status and immunologic correlatives were conducted on available tumor samples.
CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab administered at 400 mg/m² IV as a loading dose with weekly maintenance dose of 400 mg/m² is feasible and well tolerated. There was no direct correlation of the grade of rash with dose in this group of patients with heterogenous solid tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20148348      PMCID: PMC4559347          DOI: 10.1007/s10637-010-9396-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  12 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  From other ghosts of the past: acne lesion counting.

Authors:  J A Witkowski; L C Parish
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  A comparison of current acne grading systems and proposal of a novel system.

Authors:  A Doshi; A Zaheer; M J Stiller
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.736

4.  Blockade of epidermal growth factor receptor function by bivalent and monovalent fragments of 225 anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Z Fan; H Masui; I Altas; J Mendelsohn
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Cutaneous adverse effects with HER1/EGFR-targeted agents: is there a silver lining?

Authors:  Román Peréz-Soler; Leonard Saltz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Status of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in the biology and treatment of cancer.

Authors:  John Mendelsohn; Jose Baselga
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A comparison of multiplex suspension array large-panel kits for profiling cytokines and chemokines in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Imran H Khan; V V Krishnan; Melanie Ziman; Kim Janatpour; Ted Wun; Paul A Luciw; Joseph Tuscano
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.058

8.  A multirater validation study to assess the reliability of acne lesion counting.

Authors:  A W Lucky; B L Barber; C J Girman; J Williams; J Ratterman; J Waldstreicher
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 11.527

9.  Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Derek J Jonker; Chris J O'Callaghan; Christos S Karapetis; John R Zalcberg; Dongsheng Tu; Heather-Jane Au; Scott R Berry; Marianne Krahn; Timothy Price; R John Simes; Niall C Tebbutt; Guy van Hazel; Rafal Wierzbicki; Christiane Langer; Malcolm J Moore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Biological effects in vitro of monoclonal antibodies to human epidermal growth factor receptors.

Authors:  J D Sato; T Kawamoto; A D Le; J Mendelsohn; J Polikoff; G H Sato
Journal:  Mol Biol Med       Date:  1983-12
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Immunotherapy for head and neck cancer: advances and deficiencies.

Authors:  Anna-Maria De Costa; M Rita I Young
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.248

Review 2.  Monoclonal antibody therapy of pancreatic cancer with cetuximab: potential for immune modulation.

Authors:  Eric Luedke; Alena Cristina Jaime-Ramirez; Neela Bhave; William E Carson
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.456

3.  Neutralization of IL-8 prevents the induction of dermatologic adverse events associated with the inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Nannie Bangsgaard; Mischa Houtkamp; Danita H Schuurhuis; Paul W H I Parren; Ole Baadsgaard; Hans W M Niessen; Lone Skov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Methotrexate and Cetuximab-Biological Impact on Non-Tumorigenic Models: In Vitro and In Ovo Assessments.

Authors:  Andreea M Kis; Ioana Macasoi; Corina Paul; Matilda Radulescu; Roxana Buzatu; Claudia G Watz; Adelina Cheveresan; Delia Berceanu; Iulia Pinzaru; Stefania Dinu; Aniko Manea; Marioara Poenaru; Claudia Borza; Cristina A Dehelean
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.