Literature DB >> 20148345

Characterizing the mechanical contribution of fiber angular distribution in connective tissue: comparison of two modeling approaches.

Daniel H Cortes1, Spencer P Lake, Jennifer A Kadlowec, Louis J Soslowsky, Dawn M Elliott.   

Abstract

Modeling of connective tissues often includes collagen fibers explicitly as one of the components. These fibers can be oriented in many directions; therefore, several studies have considered statistical distributions to describe the fiber arrangement. One approach to formulate a constitutive framework for distributed fibers is to express the mechanical parameters, such as strain energy and stresses, in terms of angular integrals. These integrals represent the addition of the contribution of infinitesimal fractions of fibers oriented in a given direction. This approach leads to accurate results; however, it requires lengthy calculations. Recently, the use of generalized structure tensors has been proposed to represent the angular distribution in the constitutive equations of the fibers. Although this formulation is much simpler and fewer calculations are required, such structure tensors can only be used when all the fibers are in tension and the angular distribution is small. However, the amount of error introduced in these cases of non-tensile fiber loading and large angular distributions have not been quantified. Therefore, the objective of this study is to determine the range of values of angular distribution for which acceptable differences (less than 10%) between these two formulations are obtained. It was found, analytically and numerically, that both formulations are equivalent for planar distributions under equal-biaxial stretch. The comparison also showed, for other loading conditions, that the differences decrease when the fiber distribution is very small. Differences of less than 10% were usually obtained when the fiber distribution was very low (κ ≈ 0.03; κ ranges between 0 and 1/3, for aligned and isotropic distributed fibers, respectively). This range of angular distribution greatly limits the types of tissue that can be accurately analyzed using generalized structure tensors. It is expected that the results from this study guide the selection of a proper approach to analyze a particular tissue under a particular loading condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20148345      PMCID: PMC2917498          DOI: 10.1007/s10237-010-0194-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol        ISSN: 1617-7940


  21 in total

1.  A transversely isotropic biphasic finite element model of the meniscus.

Authors:  R L Spilker; P S Donzelli; V C Mow
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Invariant formulation for dispersed transverse isotropy in aortic heart valves: an efficient means for modeling fiber splay.

Authors:  Alan D Freed; Daniel R Einstein; Ivan Vesely
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2005-08-27

3.  A homogenization model of the annulus fibrosus.

Authors:  Luzhong Yin; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Quantifying the contributions of structure to annulus fibrosus mechanical function using a nonlinear, anisotropic, hyperelastic model.

Authors:  Heather Lynch Guerin; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Mechanical behavior of the human annulus fibrosus.

Authors:  H C Wu; R F Yao
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Simulation of high tensile Poisson's ratios of articular cartilage with a finite element fibril-reinforced hyperelastic model.

Authors:  José Jaime García
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Optimal design of biaxial tests for structural material characterization of flat tissues.

Authors:  Y Lanir; O Lichtenstein; O Imanuel
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Dependence of stress-strain nonlinearity of connective tissues on the geometry of collagen fibers.

Authors:  M Comninou; I V Yannas
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Constitutive equations for fibrous connective tissues.

Authors:  Y Lanir
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations.

Authors:  T Christian Gasser; Ray W Ogden; Gerhard A Holzapfel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 4.118

View more
  16 in total

1.  Modelling non-symmetric collagen fibre dispersion in arterial walls.

Authors:  Gerhard A Holzapfel; Justyna A Niestrawska; Ray W Ogden; Andreas J Reinisch; Andreas J Schriefl
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  On fibre dispersion modelling of soft biological tissues: a review.

Authors:  Gerhard A Holzapfel; Ray W Ogden; Selda Sherifova
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.704

3.  Isotropic Failure Criteria Are Not Appropriate for Anisotropic Fibrous Biological Tissues.

Authors:  Christopher E Korenczuk; Lauren E Votava; Rohit Y Dhume; Shannen B Kizilski; George E Brown; Rahul Narain; Victor H Barocas
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  A Characteristic-Based Constitutive Law for Dispersed Fibers.

Authors:  Liang Ge
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Accurate Prediction of Stress in Fibers with Distributed Orientations Using Generalized High-Order Structure Tensors.

Authors:  Daniel H Cortes; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Mech Mater       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Computational modeling reveals the relationship between intrinsic failure properties and uniaxial biomechanical behavior of arterial tissue.

Authors:  Ronald N Fortunato; Anne M Robertson; Chao Sang; Spandan Maiti
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2019-06-04

7.  Evaluation of affine fiber kinematics in human supraspinatus tendon using quantitative projection plot analysis.

Authors:  Spencer P Lake; Daniel H Cortes; Jennifer A Kadlowec; Louis J Soslowsky; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2011-04-03

8.  Isogeometric Kirchhoff-Love shell formulations for biological membranes.

Authors:  Adrián Buganza Tepole; Hardik Kabaria; Kai-Uwe Bletzinger; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 6.756

9.  Simulation of planar soft tissues using a structural constitutive model: Finite element implementation and validation.

Authors:  Rong Fan; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Sensitivity of corneal biomechanical and optical behavior to material parameters using design of experiments method.

Authors:  Mengchen Xu; Amy L Lerner; Paul D Funkenbusch; Ashutosh Richhariya; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.