Literature DB >> 20148269

Breeding behaviour of Kunzea pomifera (Myrtaceae): self-incompatibility, intraspecific and interspecific cross-compatibility.

T Page1, G M Moore, J Will, G M Halloran.   

Abstract

To examine breeding system characteristics of the endemic Australian prostrate shrub Kunzea pomifera, artificial hybridisations were undertaken using thirteen different genotypes of K. pomifera, to elucidate: (1) self-incompatibility, (2) intraspecific cross-compatibility in the species and (3) interspecific cross-compatibility with each of K. ambigua and K. ericoides. K. pomifera exhibited very low self-compatibility, with the barrier to self-fertilisation being prevention of pollen-tube growth in the style or ovary. Following intraspecific pollination amongst a number of different genotypes of K. pomifera, 38.4% of pollinated flowers developed fruit; arrest of compatible pollen-tubes in the style, preventing fertilisation, contributes to the low fruit set in this species. Interspecific compatibility was examined between K. pomifera (pistillate parent) and K. ambigua (staminate parent) where seed set per pollinated flower (4.47) was not significantly different from intraspecific crosses (4.66). In crosses between K. pomifera (pistillate parent) and K. ericoides as staminate plant, 0.037% of pollinated flowers produced fruit, with 0.0075 seeds per pollinated flower. Reproductive barriers between these two species were evident in the style of K. pomifera, where the growing tips of the K. ericoides pollen-tubes swelled and ceased to grow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20148269     DOI: 10.1007/s00497-010-0133-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Plant Reprod        ISSN: 0934-0882


  16 in total

Review 1.  Cellular and molecular mechanisms of sexual incompatibility in plants and fungi.

Authors:  S J Hiscock; U Kües
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Molecular recognition and response in pollen and pistil interactions.

Authors:  A G McCubbin; T Kao
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 13.827

Review 3.  The S-locus and unilateral incompatibility.

Authors:  C Nathan Hancock; Katsuhiko Kondo; Brian Beecher; Bruce McClure
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Evolutionary ecology of the prezygotic stage.

Authors:  G Bernasconi; T-L Ashman; T R Birkhead; J D D Bishop; U Grossniklaus; E Kubli; D L Marshall; B Schmid; I Skogsmyr; R R Snook; D Taylor; I Till-Bottraud; P I Ward; D W Zeh; B Hellriegel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-02-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Self-incompatibility in plants.

Authors:  Seiji Takayama; Akira Isogai
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 26.379

6.  Unilateral incompatibility within the brassicaceae: further evidence for the involvement of the self-incompatibility (S)-locus.

Authors:  S J Hiscock; H G Dickinson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Pollen selection.

Authors:  J I Hormaza; M Herrero
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  The relative fitness of parental and hybrid Kunzea (Myrtaceae): The interaction of reproductive traits and ecological selection.

Authors:  David A Tierney; Glenda M Wardle
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  Is Eucalyptus Cryptically Self-incompatible?

Authors:  Tasmien N Horsley; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Unilateral incompatibility in Capsicum (Solanaceae): occurrence and taxonomic distribution.

Authors:  A Naci Onus; Barbara Pickersgill
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.