Literature DB >> 20147874

Score distribution of the scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire in subgroups of patients of all ages with idiopathic scoliosis.

Eric C Parent1, Rohan Dang, Doug Hill, Jim Mahood, Marc Moreau, Jim Raso, Edmond Lou.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional measurement study.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the score distribution of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire domains and items for patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) of all ages. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Scoliosis-related quality-of-life questionnaires have demonstrated high ceiling effects in younger patients. However, the score distribution has not been examined thoroughly in other clinically relevant IS subgroups.
METHODS: The SRS-22 was completed by 173 females with IS. The proportions of ceiling effects, floor effects, of patients scoring greater than or equal to 4 out of 5 and the box plots of the score distribution for each domain and item were compared between subgroups. Subgroups were formed based on age (k = 4), management (k = 6), curve severity (k = 3), and curve type (k = 4).
RESULTS: Domain ceiling effects varied between 0% and 23.1%. Domain floor effects were observed only for Self-image (<7%) and Satisfaction (<12%). Only Pain and Satisfaction showed moderate (>20%) ceiling effects. Ceiling effects for Pain and Mental Health decreased with increasing age (P < 0.05). Pain ceiling effects decreased and Satisfaction ceiling effects increased from least to most invasive management (P < 0.05), but no differences were found among Cobb severity or curve types subgroups. Of the 22 items, 9 had major (>or=50%) ceiling effects and 11 had moderate ceiling effects. Most subgroups (14/16) had 4 to 6 items with major ceiling effects. The following items had major ceiling effects in the majority of subgroups: Function, 9 and 15; Pain, 11 and 17; and Self-image, 14.
CONCLUSION: Most SRS-22 domains had acceptable levels of ceiling effects (<20%) in the majority of the subgroups examined. However, more sensitive measurements may be needed to supplement the SRS-22 in assessing Pain in patients below 18 years or Satisfaction after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20147874     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b9c9c0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the spinal appearance questionnaire for congenital scoliosis patients over 10 years old.

Authors:  Mohammad Assadi Fanid; Dilek Yapar; Aliekber Yapar; İsmail Daldal; Mehmet Çetinkaya; Alpaslan Şenköylü
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-05-04

2.  Validity and Reliability of an Adapted Persian Version of the Scoliosis Research Society-30 Questionnaire.

Authors:  Hasan Ghandhari; Ebrahim Ameri; Ali Mahmoudi; Farshad Nikouei; Saeed Sabbaghan; Elham Mirzamohammadi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-11

3.  The suitability of the GERDyzer instrument in pH-test-proven laryngopharyngeal reflux patients.

Authors:  Cheng-Pin Wu; Wen-Miin Liang; Chen-Chi Wang; Chi-Sen Chang; Hong-Zen Yeh; Jeng-Yuan Hsu; Chung-Wang Ko; Shou-Wu Lee; Shu-Chuan Chang; Fung-Chang Sung; Han-Chung Lien
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Do the SRS-22 self-image and mental health domain scores reflect the degree of asymmetry of the back in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  James Cheshire; Adrian Gardner; Fiona Berryman; Paul Pynsent
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2017-12-11

5.  The effect of Schroth exercises added to the standard of care on the quality of life and muscle endurance in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis-an assessor and statistician blinded randomized controlled trial: "SOSORT 2015 Award Winner".

Authors:  Sanja Schreiber; Eric C Parent; Elham Khodayari Moez; Douglas M Hedden; Doug Hill; Marc J Moreau; Edmond Lou; Elise M Watkins; Sarah C Southon
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-09-18

6.  Body image in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison study of psychometric properties between four patient-reported outcome instruments.

Authors:  Antonia Matamalas; Joan Bagó; Elisabetta D'Agata; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.186

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.