Literature DB >> 20147873

Distractive force relative to initial graft compression in an in vivo anterior cervical discectomy and fusion model.

Eric I Francke1, Constantine K Demetropoulos, Steven S Agabegi, Eeric Truumees, Harry N Herkowitz.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: An in vivo biomechanical anterior cervical discectomy and instrumented fusion (ACDFI) model employing a calibrated distractor and a subminiature load cell used to intraoperatively measure distractive force across the discectomy site and subsequent compressive force across the interbody load cell following distractor removal.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between the distractive force and resultant initial graft compression in an in vivo ACDFI model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The relationship between the distractive force and subsequent graft compression following distractor removal has not been studied in an in vivo ACDFI model. The consequences of over or under distraction and its subsequent effect on graft compression with regards to axial neck pain, endplate failure with graft subsidence, and fusion rates is an area of clinical significance for ACDFI.
METHODS: Intraoperative measurements were obtained from 17 discectomy sites in 12 patients undergoing one and two level ACDFI. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects before surgery. A calibrated Caspar distractor was used to measure the distraction across the discectomy site and a subminiature interbody load cell was placed into the discectomy site and used to measure the resultant initial compressive force following distractor removal. The statistical significance and correlation between the distractive force across the discectomy site and the subsequent compressive force across the load cell were investigated with the Pearson correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: The average distractive force across the discectomy site was 33.5 +/- 11.6 lbs and the subsequent compressive force across the interbody load cell was 16.9 +/- 5.9 lbs following distractor removal. The Pearson correlation coefficient was r = 0.912 (P < 0.0005). The data showed a statistically significant linear correlation between the distractive force and the subsequent compressive force across the range of distraction investigated.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a statistically significant linear correlation between the distractive force applied across the discectomy site and the subsequent compressive force across a load cell placed in the interbody space following distractor removal in an in vivo ACDFI model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20147873     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bb0e6e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Biomechanical effects of interbody cage height on adjacent segments in patients with lumbar degeneration: a 3D finite element study.

Authors:  Xiao Lu; Dachuan Li; Hongli Wang; Xinlei Xia; Xiaosheng Ma; Feizhou Lv; Fei Zou; Jianyuan Jiang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.677

2.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages.

Authors:  Mario Cabraja; Soner Oezdemir; Daniel Koeppen; Stefan Kroppenstedt
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Spacers for Anterior Cervical Fusion: A Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Johannes Lemcke; Ferass Al-Zain; Ullrich Meier; Olaf Suess
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2011-10-07

4.  Comparison between Two Different Cervical Interbody Fusion Cages in One Level Stand-alone ACDF: Carbon Fiber Composite Frame Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage.

Authors:  Minwook Yoo; Wook-Ha Kim; Seung-Jae Hyun; Ki-Jeong Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2014-09-30

5.  Is PEEK cage better than titanium cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhi-Jun Li; Yao Wang; Gui-Jun Xu; Peng Tian
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Compression and contact area of anterior strut grafts in spinal instrumentation: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Antonius Pizanis; Jörg H Holstein; Felix Vossen; Markus Burkhardt; Tim Pohlemann
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  The Effect of Uncinate Process Resection on Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Su Hun Lee; Jun Seok Lee; Soon Ki Sung; Dong Wuk Son; Sang Weon Lee; Geun Sung Song
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2017-08-30

8.  A Lower T1 Slope as a Predictor of Subsidence in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Stand-Alone Cages.

Authors:  Su Hun Lee; Jun Seok Lee; Soon Ki Sung; Dong Wuk Son; Sang Weon Lee; Geun Sung Song
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2017-08-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.