Literature DB >> 20147811

Screw- versus cement-retained implant restorations: current concepts.

Angie Lee1, Kozue Okayasu, Hom-Lay Wang.   

Abstract

The debate between screw- versus cement-retained implant prostheses has long been discussed but the best type of implant prosthesis remains controversial among practitioners. An understanding of their properties will help the clinician in selecting the ideal prosthesis for each clinical case while promoting final esthetic outcomes. With the evolving technology and knowledge, an update of the current trends is necessary. This article provides an overview of the different characteristics of screw- and cement-retained implant restorations, and how they may influence the esthetics, retrievability, retention, passivity, occlusion, accessibility, cost, and provisional restorations. Problems and complications frequently encountered are discussed and treatment solutions are proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20147811     DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181bb9033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implant Dent        ISSN: 1056-6163            Impact factor:   2.454


  11 in total

1.  A modified technique for extraoral cementation of implant retained restorations for preventing excess cement around the margins.

Authors:  Emir Yuzbasioglu
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 2.  Factors affecting the complexity of dental implant restoration - what is the current evidence and guidance?

Authors:  S P Wright; J Hayden; J A Lynd; K Walker-Finch; J Willett; C Ucer; S D Speechley
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Factors determining the retentiveness of luting agents used with metal- and ceramic-based implant components.

Authors:  Cornelia Schiessl; Lina Schaefer; Christian Winter; Jan Fuerst; Martin Rosentritt; Florian Zeman; Michael Behr
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  The "Toronto prosthesis", an appealing method for restoring patients candidates for hybrid overdentures: A case report.

Authors:  Javier Montero; Carla Macedo de Paula; Alberto Albaladejo
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2012-12-01

5.  Comparison of access-hole filling materials for screw retained implant prostheses: 12-month in vivo study.

Authors:  Rémy Tanimura; Shiro Suzuki
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-05-05

6.  Modified Glass Ionomer Cement with "Remove on Demand" Properties: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Shaza Bishti; Taskin Tuna; Garima Agrawal; Andrij Pich; Stefan Wolfart
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-23

7.  Evaluation of Bond Strength between Grooved Titanium Alloy Implant Abutments and Provisional Veneering Materials after Surface Treatment of the Abutments: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Gowtham Venkat; Murugesan Krishnan; Suganya Srinivasan; Muthukumar Balasubramanian
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

8.  Geometry of Implant Abutment Surface Improving Cement Effectiveness: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Aradhana Rathod; Mohammad Jalaluddin; Trupti Jagannath Devadiga; Shruti Jha; Khaled M Alzahrani
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

9.  Shear bond strength of luting cements to fixed superstructure metal surfaces under various seating forces.

Authors:  Fusun Ozer; Elif Pak-Tunc; Nesrin Esen Dagli; Deepika Ramachandran; Deniz Sen; Markus Bernhard Blatz
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Retrospective Clinical Study of a Freely Removable Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis by a Microlocking System.

Authors:  Eun-Bin Bae; Won-Tak Cho; Hyun-Young Bae; So-Hyoun Lee; Tae-Hyung Kim; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.