Literature DB >> 20147716

Single-dose liposomal amphotericin B for visceral leishmaniasis in India.

Shyam Sundar1, Jaya Chakravarty, Dipti Agarwal, Madhukar Rai, Henry W Murray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some 50% of patients with visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar) worldwide live in the Indian state of Bihar. Liposomal amphotericin B is an effective treatment when administered in short courses. We wanted to determine whether the efficacy of a single infusion of liposomal amphotericin B was inferior to conventional parenteral therapy, consisting of 15 alternate-day infusions of amphotericin B deoxycholate.
METHODS: In this open-label study, we randomly assigned 412 patients in a 3:1 ratio to receive either liposomal amphotericin B (liposomal-therapy group) or amphotericin B deoxycholate (conventional-therapy group). Liposomal amphotericin B (at a dose of 10 mg per kilogram of body weight) was given once, and patients were discharged home 24 hours later. Amphotericin B deoxycholate, which was administered in 15 infusions of 1 mg per kilogram, was given every other day during a 29-day hospitalization. We determined the cure rate 6 months after treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 410 patients--304 of 304 patients (100%) in the liposomal-therapy group and 106 of 108 patients (98%) in the conventional-therapy group--had apparent cure responses at day 30. Cure rates at 6 months were similar in the two groups: 95.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.4 to 97.9) in the liposomal-therapy group and 96.3% (95% CI, 92.6 to 99.9) in the conventional-therapy group. Adverse events in the liposomal-therapy group were infusion-related fever or rigors (in 40%) and increased anemia or thrombocytopenia (in 2%); such events in the conventional-therapy group were fever or rigors (in 64%), increased anemia (in 19%), and hypokalemia (in 2%). Nephrotoxicity or hepatotoxicity developed in no more than 1% of patients in each group.
CONCLUSIONS: A single infusion of liposomal amphotericin B was not inferior to and was less expensive than conventional therapy with amphotericin B deoxycholate. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00628719.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20147716     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  135 in total

1.  Case report: Acute renal injury as a result of liposomal amphotericin B treatment in sodium stibogluconate unresponsive visceral leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Songtao Zhao; Dongxia Zhang; Ling Li; Qing Mao
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  The economic value of a visceral leishmaniasis vaccine in Bihar state, India.

Authors:  Bruce Y Lee; Kristina M Bacon; Mirat Shah; Sara Beth Kitchen; Diana L Connor; Rachel B Slayton
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 3.  Leishmaniasis in the United States: treatment in 2012.

Authors:  Henry W Murray
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Identification of new antileishmanial leads from hits obtained by high-throughput screening.

Authors:  Xiaohua Zhu; Trupti Pandharkar; Karl Werbovetz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Evaluation of arylimidamides DB1955 and DB1960 as candidates against visceral leishmaniasis and Chagas' disease: in vivo efficacy, acute toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and toxicology studies.

Authors:  Xiaohua Zhu; Qiang Liu; Sihyung Yang; Toufan Parman; Carol E Green; Jon C Mirsalis; Maria de Nazaré Correia Soeiro; Elen Mello de Souza; Cristiane França da Silva; Denise da Gama Jaen Batista; Chad E Stephens; Moloy Banerjee; Abdelbasset A Farahat; Manoj Munde; W David Wilson; David W Boykin; Michael Zhuo Wang; Karl A Werbovetz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Effectiveness and safety of liposomal amphotericin B for visceral leishmaniasis under routine program conditions in Bihar, India.

Authors:  Prabhat K Sinha; Paul Roddy; Pedro Pablo Palma; Alice Kociejowski; María Angeles Lima; Vidya Nand Rabi Das; Jitendra Gupta; Nawin Kumar; Gaurab Mitra; Jean-François Saint-Sauveur; Siju Seena; Manica Balasegaram; Fernando Parreño; Krishna Pandey
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.345

7.  Lysis syndrome during therapy of visceral leishmaniasis.

Authors:  E N Liberopoulos; A A Kei; M S Elisaf
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 8.  Chemotherapeutics of visceral leishmaniasis: present and future developments.

Authors:  Shyam Sundar; Anup Singh
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 9.  Elimination of visceral leishmaniasis on the Indian subcontinent.

Authors:  Om Prakash Singh; Epco Hasker; Marleen Boelaert; Shyam Sundar
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 25.071

10.  Elucidation of cellular mechanisms involved in experimental paromomycin resistance in Leishmania donovani.

Authors:  Vasundhra Bhandari; Shyam Sundar; Jean Claude Dujardin; Poonam Salotra
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.