BACKGROUND: Public health strategies place increasing emphasis on opportunities to promote healthy behaviours within the workplace setting. Previous research has suggested worksite health promotion programmes have positive effects on physical activity and weight loss, yet little is known regarding their effects on dietary behaviour. The aim of this review was to assess the effects of worksite interventions on employee diets. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, EMBASE, LexisNexis) were searched for relevant articles published between 1995 and April 2009. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were peer-reviewed English language publications describing a worksite-based health promotion intervention with minimum study duration of eight weeks. All study designs were eligible. Studies had to report one or more diet-related outcome (energy, fat, fruit, or vegetable intakes). Methodological quality was assessed using a checklist that included randomisation methods, use of a control group, and study attrition rates. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included in the review. Eight programmes focussed on employee education, and the remainder targeted change to the worksite environment, either alone or in combination with education. Study methodological quality was moderate. In general, worksite interventions led to positive changes in fruit, vegetable and total fat intake. However, reliance on self-reported methods of dietary assessment means there is a significant risk of bias. No study measured more robust outcomes such as absenteeism, productivity, or healthcare utilisation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review suggest that worksite health promotion programmes are associated with moderate improvement in dietary intake. The quality of studies to date has been frequently sub-optimal and further, well designed studies are needed in order to reliably determine effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Future programmes to improve employee dietary habits should move beyond individual education and aim to intervene at multiple levels of the worksite environment.
BACKGROUND: Public health strategies place increasing emphasis on opportunities to promote healthy behaviours within the workplace setting. Previous research has suggested worksite health promotion programmes have positive effects on physical activity and weight loss, yet little is known regarding their effects on dietary behaviour. The aim of this review was to assess the effects of worksite interventions on employee diets. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, EMBASE, LexisNexis) were searched for relevant articles published between 1995 and April 2009. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were peer-reviewed English language publications describing a worksite-based health promotion intervention with minimum study duration of eight weeks. All study designs were eligible. Studies had to report one or more diet-related outcome (energy, fat, fruit, or vegetable intakes). Methodological quality was assessed using a checklist that included randomisation methods, use of a control group, and study attrition rates. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included in the review. Eight programmes focussed on employee education, and the remainder targeted change to the worksite environment, either alone or in combination with education. Study methodological quality was moderate. In general, worksite interventions led to positive changes in fruit, vegetable and total fat intake. However, reliance on self-reported methods of dietary assessment means there is a significant risk of bias. No study measured more robust outcomes such as absenteeism, productivity, or healthcare utilisation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review suggest that worksite health promotion programmes are associated with moderate improvement in dietary intake. The quality of studies to date has been frequently sub-optimal and further, well designed studies are needed in order to reliably determine effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Future programmes to improve employee dietary habits should move beyond individual education and aim to intervene at multiple levels of the worksite environment.
Authors: Ingrid Steenhuis; Patricia Van Assema; Gerard Van Breukelen; Karen Glanz; Gerjo Kok; Hein De Vries Journal: Health Promot Int Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 2.483
Authors: Glorian Sorensen; Anne M Stoddard; Tamara Dubowitz; Elizabeth M Barbeau; JudyAnn Bigby; Karen M Emmons; Lisa F Berkman; Karen E Peterson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ross Arena; Marco Guazzi; Paige D Briggs; Lawrence P Cahalin; Jonathan Myers; Leonard A Kaminsky; Daniel E Forman; Gerson Cipriano; Audrey Borghi-Silva; Abraham Samuel Babu; Carl J Lavie Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Ibrahim Zaganjor; Suzan L Carmichael; A J Agopian; Andrew F Olshan; Tania A Desrosiers Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Kerry S Kuehl; Diane L Elliot; David P MacKinnon; Holly P O'Rourke; Carol DeFrancesco; Milica Miočević; Matthew Valente; Adriana Sleigh; Bharti Garg; Wendy McGinnis; Hannah Kuehl Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Claire Townsend Ing; Robin E S Miyamoto; Rui Fang; Mapuana Antonio; Diane Paloma; Kathryn L Braun; Joseph Keawe'aimoku Kaholokula Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2018-03-04
Authors: Stephen J Onufrak; Hatidza Zaganjor; Latetia V Moore; Heather C Hamner; Joel E Kimmons; Leah M Maynard; Diane Harris Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2019-01-02
Authors: Erin Poe Ferranti; Sandra B Dunbar; Melinda Higgins; Jun Dai; Thomas R Ziegler; Jennifer K Frediani; Carolyn Reilly; Kenneth L Brigham Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 2.228