Literature DB >> 20146762

Valuing ecosystem services: theory, practice, and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis.

Shuang Liu1, Robert Costanza, Stephen Farber, Austin Troy.   

Abstract

The concept of ecosystem services has shifted our paradigm of how nature matters to human societies. Instead of viewing the preservation of nature as something for which we have to sacrifice our well-being, we now perceive the environment as natural capital, one of society's important assets. But ecosystem services are becoming increasingly scarce. In order to stop this trend, the challenge is to provoke society to acknowledge the value of natural capital. Ecosystem services valuation (ESV) is the method to tackle such a challenge. ESV is the process of assessing the contributions of ecosystem services to sustainable scale, fair distribution, and efficient allocation. It is a tool that (1) provides for comparisons of natural capital to physical and human capital in regard to their contributions to human welfare; (2) monitors the quantity and quality of natural capital over time with respect to its contribution to human welfare; and (3) provides for evaluation of projects that will affect natural capital stocks. This review covers: (1) what has been done in ESV research in the last 50 years; (2) how it has been used in ecosystem management; and (3) prospects for the future. Our survey of the literature has shown that over time, there has been movement toward a more transdisciplinary approach to ESV research which is more consistent with the nature of the problems being addressed. On the other hand, the contribution of ESV to ecosystem management has not been as significant as hoped nor as clearly defined. Conclusions drawn from the review are as follows: first, ESV researchers will have to transcend disciplinary boundaries and synthesize tools, skills, and methodologies from various disciplines; second, ESV research has to become more problem-driven rather than tool-driven because ultimately the success of ESV will be judged on how well it facilitates real-world decision making and the conservation of natural capital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20146762     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05167.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  11 in total

1.  Valuing New Jersey's ecosystem services and natural capital: a spatially explicit benefit transfer approach.

Authors:  Shuang Liu; Robert Costanza; Austin Troy; John D'Aagostino; Willam Mates
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Policy impacts of ecosystem services knowledge.

Authors:  Stephen M Posner; Emily McKenzie; Taylor H Ricketts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Changing ecosystem service values following technological change.

Authors:  Jordi Honey-Rosés; Daniel W Schneider; Nicholas Brozović
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Transdisciplinarity as an inference technique to achieve a better understanding in the health and environmental sciences.

Authors:  Matilda Annerstedt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Incorporating Ecosystem Services in the Assessment of Water Framework Directive Programmes of Measures.

Authors:  Ioannis Souliotis; Nikolaos Voulvoulis
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 6.  Ecological risk assessment in the context of global climate change.

Authors:  Wayne G Landis; Judi L Durda; Marjorie L Brooks; Peter M Chapman; Charles A Menzie; Ralph G Stahl; Jennifer L Stauber
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy.

Authors:  Christina P Wong; Bo Jiang; Ann P Kinzig; Kai N Lee; Zhiyun Ouyang
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Solving problems in social-ecological systems: definition, practice and barriers of transdisciplinary research.

Authors:  Per Angelstam; Kjell Andersson; Matilda Annerstedt; Robert Axelsson; Marine Elbakidze; Pablo Garrido; Patrik Grahn; K Ingemar Jönsson; Simen Pedersen; Peter Schlyter; Erik Skärbäck; Mike Smith; Ingrid Stjernquist
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.129

9.  Land use changes and their effects on the value of ecosystem services in the small Sanjiang plain in China.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Bo-Ming Sun; Dan Chen; Xin Wu; Long-Zhu Guo; Gang Wang
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-03-09

10.  Quantifying preferences for the natural world using monetary and nonmonetary assessments of value.

Authors:  Martin Dallimer; Dugald Tinch; Nick Hanley; Katherine N Irvine; James R Rouquette; Philip H Warren; Lorraine Maltby; Kevin J Gaston; Paul R Armsworth
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 6.560

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.