Literature DB >> 20146642

Measuring posttraumatic stress following childbirth: a critical evaluation of instruments.

Claire A I Stramrood1, Elisabeth M J Huis In 't Veld, Maria G Van Pampus, Leonard W A R Berger, Ad J J M Vingerhoets, Willibrord C M Weijmar Schultz, Paul P Van den Berg, Eric L P Van Sonderen, K Marieke Paarlberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate instruments used to assess posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following childbirth with both quantitative (reliability analysis and factor analysis) and qualitative (comparison of operationalization) techniques.
METHODS: An unselected population of 428 women completed the Traumatic Event Scale-B (TES-B) and the PTSD Symptom Scale-Self Report (PSS-SR) 2-6 months after delivery.
RESULTS: Assessment of internal consistency yielded similar results for the TES-B and PSS-SR (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87 and 0.82, respectively). Factor analysis revealed two rather than three DSM-IV symptom categories for both instruments: childbirth-related factors (re-experiencing/ avoidance) and symptoms of depression and anxiety (numbing/hyperarousal). Although the TES-B and the PSS-SR sum-scores show a strong relationship (Spearmans rho = 0.78), agreement between the instruments on the identification of PTSD cases is low (kappa = 0.24); discrepancy between TES-B and PSS-SR is largely due to differences in instruction to respondents, formulation of items, answer categories, and cut-off values.
CONCLUSIONS: Large operationalization differences between TES-B and PSS-SR have been identified, i.e., in the formulation of questions, answer categories, cut-off values and instructions to respondents. Comparison between studies using different instruments for measuring PTSD following childbirth should be done with utmost caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20146642     DOI: 10.3109/01674820903573946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0167-482X            Impact factor:   2.949


  6 in total

1.  Development of a Postpartum Stressor Measure.

Authors:  E R Park; C Psaros; L Traeger; A Stagg; J Jacquart; J Willett; M D Alert; K L LaRoche; J L Ecker
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-10

Review 2.  A systematic review of the relationship between severe maternal morbidity and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Marie Furuta; Jane Sandall; Debra Bick
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Risk factors for chronic post-traumatic stress disorder development one year after vaginal delivery: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Loïc Sentilhes; Françoise Maillard; Stéphanie Brun; Hugo Madar; Benjamin Merlot; François Goffinet; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Construct Validity and Psychometric Properties of the Hebrew Version of the City Birth Trauma Scale.

Authors:  Jonathan E Handelzalts; Ilana S Hairston; Adi Matatyahu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-18

5.  Development of a Measure of Postpartum PTSD: The City Birth Trauma Scale.

Authors:  Susan Ayers; Daniel B Wright; Alexandra Thornton
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Psychometric properties of the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) in Greek women after cesarean section.

Authors:  Eirini Orovou; Irina Mrvoljak Theodoropoulou; Evangelia Antoniou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.