PURPOSE: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of intetumumab in combination with docetaxel in patients with castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Patients and methods In this phase 1, open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized study, 75 mg/m² docetaxel was administered on Day 1 of each of nine 21-day treatment cycles and intetumumab 5 or 10 mg/kg was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycles 2 and 3 and on Day 1 of all subsequent cycles. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during Cycles 2 and 3. Secondary endpoints included serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and objective response based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). RESULTS: Ten patients were treated (5 mg/kg n = 3, 10 mg/kg n = 7). No DLTs occurred. Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in the 10-mg/kg intetumumab group. Common TEAEs were neutropenia (10 mg/kg n = 6) and nausea (5 mg/kg n = 1, 10 mg/kg n = 5). Four 10-mg/kg-treated patients reported serious TEAEs; of these, only febrile neutropenia was considered probably intetumumab-related. In the 10-mg/kg group, four patients had a serum PSA response (two of whom responded within 3 months of treatment), one patient demonstrated partial tumor response for 11 weeks, and none had progressive disease at Cycle 9. No PSA or tumor response was observed in the 5-mg/kg group. CONCLUSIONS: Intetumumab was generally safe and well tolerated in combination with docetaxel, with a higher incidence of TEAEs in the 10 mg/kg dose cohort. The efficacy of 10 mg/kg intetumumab in combination with docetaxel appears to warrant further study.
PURPOSE: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of intetumumab in combination with docetaxel in patients with castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Patients and methods In this phase 1, open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized study, 75 mg/m² docetaxel was administered on Day 1 of each of nine 21-day treatment cycles and intetumumab 5 or 10 mg/kg was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycles 2 and 3 and on Day 1 of all subsequent cycles. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during Cycles 2 and 3. Secondary endpoints included serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and objective response based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). RESULTS: Ten patients were treated (5 mg/kg n = 3, 10 mg/kg n = 7). No DLTs occurred. Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in the 10-mg/kg intetumumab group. Common TEAEs were neutropenia (10 mg/kg n = 6) and nausea (5 mg/kg n = 1, 10 mg/kg n = 5). Four 10-mg/kg-treated patients reported serious TEAEs; of these, only febrile neutropenia was considered probably intetumumab-related. In the 10-mg/kg group, four patients had a serum PSA response (two of whom responded within 3 months of treatment), one patient demonstrated partial tumor response for 11 weeks, and none had progressive disease at Cycle 9. No PSA or tumor response was observed in the 5-mg/kg group. CONCLUSIONS:Intetumumab was generally safe and well tolerated in combination with docetaxel, with a higher incidence of TEAEs in the 10 mg/kg dose cohort. The efficacy of 10 mg/kg intetumumab in combination with docetaxel appears to warrant further study.
Authors: M Edlund; T Miyamoto; R A Sikes; R Ogle; G W Laurie; M C Farach-Carson; C A Otey; H E Zhau; L W Chung Journal: Cell Growth Differ Date: 2001-02
Authors: Kristen Bisanz; Jie Yu; Magnus Edlund; Bill Spohn; Mien-Chie Hung; Leland W K Chung; Chia-Ling Hsieh Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jingquan Jia; Alex Starodub; Ian Cushman; Yingmiao Liu; Deborah J Marshall; Herbert I Hurwitz; Andrew B Nixon Journal: Anticancer Drugs Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.248
Authors: Hira Lal Goel; Aejaz Sayeed; Michael Breen; Matthew J Zarif; David S Garlick; Irwin Leav; Roger J Davis; Thomas J Fitzgerald; Andrea Morrione; Chung-Cheng Hsieh; Qin Liu; Adam P Dicker; Dario C Altieri; Lucia R Languino Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: Mark Sutherland; Andrew Gordon; Steven D Shnyder; Laurence H Patterson; Helen M Sheldrake Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 6.639