Literature DB >> 20145965

Activation of human mononuclear cells by porcine biologic meshes in vitro.

S B Orenstein1, Y Qiao, U Klueh, D L Kreutzer, Y W Novitsky.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: While porcine-based biologic meshes are increasingly used for hernia repair, little data exist on tissue responses to such products. Host foreign body reaction, local inflammation, and wound healing are principally controlled by monocytes/macrophages (M/MØs). Exaggerated activation of M/MØs may deleteriously influence mesh integration and remodeling. We hypothesized that common porcine meshes induce the differential activation of M/MØs in vitro.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples of four acellular porcine-derived meshes, CollaMend (CM; C.R. Bard/Davol), Permacol (PC; TSL/Covidien), Strattice (ST; LifeCell), and Surgisis (SS; Cook Biotech), were exposed to mononuclear cells derived from the peripheral blood of six healthy subjects. Following a 7-day incubation period, supernatants were assayed for interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay system. The four groups were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t-test.
RESULTS: Each mesh type induced differential mononuclear cell activation in vitro. The mean IL-1beta expressions for CM (7,195 pg/ml) and PC (4,215 pg/ml) were significantly higher compared to ST and SS (123 and 998 pg/ml, respectively; P < 0.05). Similar trends were also seen for IL-6 (range 445-70,729 pg/ml), IL-8 (range 11,640-1,045,938 pg/ml), and VEGF (range 686-7,133 pg/ml).
CONCLUSION: For the first time, we demonstrated that porcine meshes induce M/MØ activation in vitro. CM and PC (chemically crosslinked dermis) induced significantly higher cytokine expression compared to ST (non-crosslinked dermis) and SS (small intestine submucosa). These differences are likely related to proprietary processing methods and/or the extent of collagen crosslinking. Further understanding of immunologic effects of porcine-derived biologic meshes will not only allow for a comparison between existing products, but it may also lead to mesh modifications and improvement of their clinical performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20145965     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-010-0634-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  46 in total

Review 1.  The biology of hernia formation.

Authors:  P Lynen Jansen; P r Mertens Pr; U Klinge; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  The history of open inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  James Johnson; J Scott Roth; Jeffrey W Hazey; Walter E Pofahl
Journal:  Curr Surg       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

3.  A porcine-derived acellular dermal scaffold that supports soft tissue regeneration: removal of terminal galactose-alpha-(1,3)-galactose and retention of matrix structure.

Authors:  Hui Xu; Hua Wan; Wenqi Zuo; Wendell Sun; Rick T Owens; John R Harper; David L Ayares; David J McQuillan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Macrophage phenotype as a determinant of biologic scaffold remodeling.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak; Jolene E Valentin; Anjani K Ravindra; George P McCabe; Ann M Stewart-Akers
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  Methods for the treatment of collagenous tissues for bioprostheses.

Authors:  E Khor
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Human monocyte activation by biologic and biodegradable meshes in vitro.

Authors:  Sean B Orenstein; Yi Qiao; Manjot Kaur; Ulrike Klueh; Don L Kreutzer; Yuri W Novitsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Abdominal wall hernia repair: a comparison of Permacol and Surgisis grafts in a rat hernia model.

Authors:  F S Ayubi; P J Armstrong; M S Mattia; D M Parker
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Retention of structural and biochemical integrity in a biological mesh supports tissue remodeling in a primate abdominal wall model.

Authors:  Jerome Connor; David McQuillan; Maryellen Sandor; Hua Wan; Jared Lombardi; Nathaniel Bachrach; John Harper; Hui Xu
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 9.  Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.708

10.  Acellular dermal matrix compared with synthetic implant material for repair of ventral hernia in the setting of peri-operative Staphylococcus aureus implant contamination: a rabbit model.

Authors:  Meghan L Milburn; Luther H Holton; Thomas L Chung; Edward N Li; Grant V Bochicchio; Nelson H Goldberg; Ronald P Silverman
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.150

View more
  22 in total

1.  Letter. Re: Orenstein et al. (2010) Activation of human mononuclear cells by porcine biologic meshes in vitro. Hernia 14(4):401-407.

Authors:  N J Smart; D Khan; I R Daniels
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Fabrication of silk mesh with enhanced cytocompatibility: preliminary in vitro investigation toward cell-based therapy for hernia repair.

Authors:  O Guillaume; J Park; X Monforte; S Gruber-Blum; H Redl; A Petter-Puchner; A H Teuschl
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  To cross-link or not to cross-link? Cross-linking associated foreign body response of collagen-based devices.

Authors:  Luis M Delgado; Yves Bayon; Abhay Pandit; Dimitrios I Zeugolis
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 6.389

4.  Bioprosthetic mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Donald P Baumann; Charles E Butler
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Absorbable Polyglactin vs. Non-Cross-linked Porcine Biological Mesh for the Surgical Treatment of Infected Incisional Hernia.

Authors:  Yohann Renard; Louis de Mestier; Julie Henriques; Paul de Boissieu; Philippe de Mestier; Abe Fingerhut; Jean-Pierre Palot; Reza Kianmanesh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Effects of mesenchymal stem cell and fibroblast coating on immunogenic potential of prosthetic meshes in vitro.

Authors:  Yue Gao; David M Krpata; Cory N Criss; Lijia Liu; Natasza Posielski; Michael J Rosen; Yuri W Novitsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Predicting in vivo responses to biomaterials via combined in vitro and in silico analysis.

Authors:  Matthew T Wolf; Yoram Vodovotz; Stephen Tottey; Bryan N Brown; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.056

8.  Comparison of Permacol™ and Strattice™ for the repair of abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  K E Mulier; A H Nguyen; J P Delaney; S Marquez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Cell-coating affects tissue integration of synthetic and biologic meshes: comparative analysis of the onlay and underlay mesh positioning in rats.

Authors:  Arnab Majumder; Yue Gao; Emanuel E Sadava; James M Anderson; Yuri W Novitsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparative analysis of histopathologic responses to implanted porcine biologic meshes.

Authors:  Y W Novitsky; S B Orenstein; D L Kreutzer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.