Literature DB >> 20145261

Comparison of the gastrointestinal absorption and bioavailability of fenofibrate and fenofibric acid in humans.

Tong Zhu1, Jean-Claude Ansquer, Maureen T Kelly, Darryl J Sleep, Rajendra S Pradhan.   

Abstract

This study compared the gastrointestinal (GI) absorption characteristics and absolute bioavailability of fenofibric acid and fenofibrate (which is converted to fenofibric acid in vivo) in healthy volunteers. Treatments were delivered to the proximal small bowel, distal small bowel, and colon using a site-specific delivery system (Enterion capsule) and to the stomach by oral administration of equimolar doses. Serial blood samples were collected for 120 hours postdose and assayed for plasma fenofibric acid concentrations. The absolute bioavailability of each treatment was determined relative to 50 mg of fenofibric acid administered intravenously. Plasma exposure to fenofibric acid following fenofibric acid administration was approximately 1.5 times higher than that following fenofibrate administration for delivery to the proximal and distal small bowel and following oral administration, and it was approximately 5 times higher following colon delivery. The absolute bioavailability in the stomach, proximal small bowel, distal small bowel, and colon was approximately 81%, 88%, 84%, and 78%, respectively, for fenofibric acid and 69%, 73%, 66%, and 22%, respectively, for fenofibrate (P < .0001 and P = .033 for fenofibric acid vs fenofibrate in the colon and distal small bowel, respectively). In conclusion, fenofibric acid is well absorbed throughout the GI tract and has greater bioavailability than fenofibrate in all GI regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20145261     DOI: 10.1177/0091270009354995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  8 in total

1.  In vitro antimalarial activity and drug interactions of fenofibric acid.

Authors:  Rina P M Wong; Timothy M E Davis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Comparative Bioavailability Study of Solid Self-Nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery System of Fenofibric Acid in Healthy Male Subjects.

Authors:  Wira Noviana Suhery; Diky Mudhakir; Yeyet Cahyati Sumirtapura; Jessie Sofia Pamudji
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Comparative In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Fenofibric Acid as an Antihyperlipidemic Drug.

Authors:  Yulias Ninik Windriyati; Yeyet Cahyati Sumirtapura; Jessie Sofia Pamudji
Journal:  Turk J Pharm Sci       Date:  2020-04-24

Review 4.  Management of dyslipidemias with fibrates, alone and in combination with statins: role of delayed-release fenofibric acid.

Authors:  Elisavet Moutzouri; Anastazia Kei; Moses S Elisaf; Haralampos J Milionis
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-08-09

5.  Modulating drug release from gastric-floating microcapsules through spray-coating layers.

Authors:  Wei Li Lee; Jun Wei Melvin Tan; Chaoyang Nicholas Tan; Say Chye Joachim Loo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  A Review of Currently Available Fenofibrate and Fenofibric Acid Formulations.

Authors:  Hua Ling; John T Luoma; Daniel Hilleman
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2013-05-09

Review 7.  Intestinal absorption of BCS class II drugs administered as nanoparticles: A review based on in vivo data from intestinal perfusion models.

Authors:  David Dahlgren; Erik Sjögren; Hans Lennernäs
Journal:  ADMET DMPK       Date:  2020-09-17

8.  Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Fixed Dose Combination of Rosuvastatin and Choline Fenofibrate to Fixed Dose Combination of Rosuvastatin and Fenofibrate in Patients of Mixed Dyslipidemia: A Randomized, Open-label, Multicentre Clinical Trial in Indian Population.

Authors:  Hanmant Barkate; Piyush Patel; Dimple Shah; Falgun Vyas
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.