Literature DB >> 20145138

Common genetic variants associated with breast cancer and mammographic density measures that predict disease.

Fabrice Odefrey1, Jennifer Stone, Lyle C Gurrin, Graham B Byrnes, Carmel Apicella, Gillian S Dite, Jennifer N Cawson, Graham G Giles, Susan A Treloar, Dallas R English, John L Hopper, Melissa C Southey.   

Abstract

Mammographic density for age and body mass index (BMI) is a heritable risk factor for breast cancer. We aimed to determine if recently identified common variants associated with small gradients in breast cancer risk are associated with mammographic density. We genotyped 497 monozygotic and 330 dizygotic twin pairs and 634 of their sisters from 903 families for 12 independent variants. Mammographic dense area, percent dense area, and nondense area were measured by three observers using a computer-thresholding technique. Associations with mammographic density measures adjusted for age, BMI, and other determinants were estimated (a) cross-sectionally using a multivariate normal model for pedigree analysis (P(x)), (b) between sibships, and (c) within sibships using orthogonal transformations of outcomes and exposures. A combined test of association (P(c)) was derived using the independent estimates from b and c. We tested if the distributions of P values across variants differed from the uniform distribution (P(u)). For dense area and percent dense area, the distributions of P(c) values were not uniform (both P(u) <0.007). Consistent with their breast cancer associations, rs3817198 (LSP1) and rs13281615 (8q) were associated with dense area and percent dense area (all P(x) and P(c) <0.05), and rs889312 (MAP3K1), rs2107425 (H19), and rs17468277 (CASP8) were marginally associated with dense area (some P(x) or P(c) <0.05). All associations were independent of menopausal status. At least two common breast cancer susceptibility variants are associated with mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer. These findings could help elucidate how those variants and mammographic density measures are associated with breast cancer susceptibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20145138     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  27 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density.

Authors:  Valentina Assi; Jane Warwick; Jack Cuzick; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Genetic variants improve breast cancer risk prediction on mammograms.

Authors:  Jie Liu; David Page; Houssam Nassif; Jude Shavlik; Peggy Peissig; Catherine McCarty; Adedayo A Onitilo; Elizabeth Burnside
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

3.  Boosting association rule mining in large datasets via Gibbs sampling.

Authors:  Guoqi Qian; Calyampudi Radhakrishna Rao; Xiaoying Sun; Yuehua Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Novel Associations between Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants and Risk-Predicting Mammographic Density Measures.

Authors:  Jennifer Stone; Deborah J Thompson; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Christopher Scott; Rulla M Tamimi; Sara Lindstrom; Peter Kraft; Aditi Hazra; Jingmei Li; Louise Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Per Hall; Matt Jensen; Julie Cunningham; Janet E Olson; Kristen Purrington; Fergus J Couch; Judith Brown; Jean Leyland; Ruth M L Warren; Robert N Luben; Kay-Tee Khaw; Paula Smith; Nicholas J Wareham; Sebastian M Jud; Katharina Heusinger; Matthias W Beckmann; Julie A Douglas; Kaanan P Shah; Heang-Ping Chan; Mark A Helvie; Loic Le Marchand; Laurence N Kolonel; Christy Woolcott; Gertraud Maskarinec; Christopher Haiman; Graham G Giles; Laura Baglietto; Kavitha Krishnan; Melissa C Southey; Carmel Apicella; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Giske Ursin; Grethe I Grenaker Alnaes; Vessela N Kristensen; Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale; Inger Torhild Gram; Manjeet K Bolla; Qin Wang; Kyriaki Michailidou; Joe Dennis; Jacques Simard; Paul Pharoah; Alison M Dunning; Douglas F Easton; Peter A Fasching; V Shane Pankratz; John L Hopper; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Common breast cancer susceptibility variants in LSP1 and RAD51L1 are associated with mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; Christopher G Scott; Peter A Fasching; Per Hall; Rulla M Tamimi; Jingmei Li; Jennifer Stone; Carmel Apicella; Fabrice Odefrey; Gretchen L Gierach; Sebastian M Jud; Katharina Heusinger; Matthias W Beckmann; Marina Pollan; Pablo Fernández-Navarro; Anna Gonzalez-Neira; Javier Benitez; Carla H van Gils; Mariëtte Lokate; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Petra H M Peeters; Judith Brown; Jean Leyland; Jajini S Varghese; Douglas F Easton; Deborah J Thompson; Robert N Luben; Ruth M L Warren; Nicholas J Wareham; Ruth J F Loos; Kay-Tee Khaw; Giske Ursin; Eunjung Lee; Simon A Gayther; Susan J Ramus; Rosalind A Eeles; Martin O Leach; Gek Kwan-Lim; Fergus J Couch; Graham G Giles; Laura Baglietto; Kavitha Krishnan; Melissa C Southey; Loic Le Marchand; Laurence N Kolonel; Christy Woolcott; Gertraud Maskarinec; Christopher A Haiman; Kate Walker; Nichola Johnson; Valeria A McCormack; Margarethe Biong; Grethe I G Alnaes; Inger Torhild Gram; Vessela N Kristensen; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Sara Lindström; Susan E Hankinson; David J Hunter; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Norman F Boyd; Jonine D Figuero; Jolanta Lissowska; Ewa Wesolowska; Beata Peplonska; Agnieszka Bukowska; Edyta Reszka; JianJun Liu; Louise Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Tina Audley; Anna H Wu; V Shane Pankratz; John L Hopper; Isabel dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Causes of blood methylomic variation for middle-aged women measured by the HumanMethylation450 array.

Authors:  Shuai Li; Ee Ming Wong; Tuong L Nguyen; Ji-Hoon Eric Joo; Jennifer Stone; Gillian S Dite; Graham G Giles; Richard Saffery; Melissa C Southey; John L Hopper
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.528

7.  Genetic variation in transforming growth factor beta 1 and mammographic density in Singapore Chinese women.

Authors:  Eunjung Lee; David Van Den Berg; Chris Hsu; Giske Ursin; Woon-Puay Koh; Jian-Min Yuan; Daniel O Stram; Mimi C Yu; Anna H Wu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Genetic variation in sensitivity to estrogens and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  D Joseph Jerry; James D Shull; Darryl L Hadsell; Monique Rijnkels; Karen A Dunphy; Sallie S Schneider; Laura N Vandenberg; Prabin Dhangada Majhi; Celia Byrne; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  No evidence for association of inherited variation in genes involved in mitosis and percent mammographic density.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; Jingmei Li; Christopher G Scott; Per Hall; Kamila Czene; Xianshu Wang; Jianjun Liu; Zachary S Fredericksen; David N Rider; Fang-Fang Wu; Janet E Olson; Julie M Cunningham; Kristen N Stevens; Thomas A Sellers; Shane V Pankratz; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Inference about causation between body mass index and DNA methylation in blood from a twin family study.

Authors:  Shuai Li; Ee Ming Wong; Minh Bui; Tuong L Nguyen; Ji-Hoon Eric Joo; Jennifer Stone; Gillian S Dite; Pierre-Antoine Dugué; Roger L Milne; Graham G Giles; Richard Saffery; Melissa C Southey; John L Hopper
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.095

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.