Satellite cells are skeletal muscle stem cells capable of self-renewal and differentiation after transplantation, but whether they contribute to endogenous muscle fiber repair has been unclear. The transcription factor Pax7 marks satellite cells and is critical for establishing the adult satellite cell pool. By using a lineage tracing approach, we show that after injury, quiescent adult Pax7(+) cells enter the cell cycle; a subpopulation returns to quiescence to replenish the satellite cell compartment, while others contribute to muscle fiber formation. We demonstrate that Sprouty1 (Spry1), a receptor tyrosine kinase signaling inhibitor, is expressed in quiescent Pax7(+) satellite cells in uninjured muscle, downregulated in proliferating myogenic cells after injury, and reinduced as Pax7(+) cells re-enter quiescence. We show that Spry1 is required for the return to quiescence and homeostasis of the satellite cell pool during repair. Our results therefore define a role for Spry1 in adult muscle stem cell biology and tissue repair. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Satellite cells are skeletal muscle stem cells capable of self-renewal and differentiation after transplantation, but whether they contribute to endogenous muscle fiber repair has been unclear. The transcription factor Pax7 marks satellite cells and is critical for establishing the adult satellite cell pool. By using a lineage tracing approach, we show that after injury, quiescent adult Pax7(+) cells enter the cell cycle; a subpopulation returns to quiescence to replenish the satellite cell compartment, while others contribute to muscle fiber formation. We demonstrate that Sprouty1 (Spry1), a receptor tyrosine kinase signaling inhibitor, is expressed in quiescent Pax7(+) satellite cells in uninjured muscle, downregulated in proliferating myogenic cells after injury, and reinduced as Pax7(+) cells re-enter quiescence. We show that Spry1 is required for the return to quiescence and homeostasis of the satellite cell pool during repair. Our results therefore define a role for Spry1 in adult muscle stem cell biology and tissue repair. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Reversible quiescence is widely accepted to be a defining property of adult
stem cells. The ability of adult stem cells to transition to a reversible quiescent
state after providing a source of progeny is critical for homeostasis of tissue
resident stem cells and presumably the maintenance of the tissue during numerous
rounds of damage caused by various insults throughout life.Adult skeletal muscle satellite cells (skeletal muscle stem cells) are
located between the muscle fiber sarcolemma and the basal lamina surrounding the
fiber and are major contributors to the maintenance and repair of postnatal skeletal
muscle tissue. In uninjured muscle, satellite cells reside in a quiescent state and
express the paired-box protein Pax7, a critical regulator of satellite cell survival
and required for muscle tissue homeostasis (Seale et
al., 2000; Oustanina et al., 2004;
Kuang et al., 2006; Relaix et al., 2006). Transplantation studies have
demonstrated that a sub-population of satellite cells are capable of both
self-renewal and differentiation during muscle tissue repair (Montarras et al., 2005; Collins et al., 2005; Kuang et al.,
2007; Sacco et al., 2008; Cerletti et al., 2008). However the mechanism by
which a subset of satellite cells or their progeny by-passes cues to differentiate
and instead return to quiescence to replenish the quiescent adult muscle stem cell
pool, i.e., self-renew, during the regeneration process remains incompletely
understood.Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (RTK) signaling is critical for many processes
during development and regeneration including myogenic fate decisions (Johnson et al., 1994; Poss et al., 2000; Lee et
al., 2005; Abou-Khalil et al.,
2009). RTK ligands such as FGF and HGF are potent activators of muscle
satellite cells (Yablonka-Reuveni et al.,
1999; Sheehan and Allen, 1999;
Jones et al., 2001). The activity of
these signaling pathways is tightly controlled by the action of feedback regulators.
One downstream target and negative regulator of RTK signaling is Sprouty
(Spry) (Hanafusa et al.,
2002; Kim and Bar-Sagi, 2004;
Mason et al., 2006). The mouse and human
genomes contain four Spry genes (Spry1-Spry4). In
Drosophila, Spry is required for cell fate
determination in many settings (Reich et al.,
1999; Kramer et al., 1999; Casci et al., 1999). Recent gain of function
experiments demonstrated that Spry2 promoted a shift in fate of
myogenic cells, favoring a less differentiated Pax3/7-expressing population at the
expense of a more differentiated myogenin-expressing population during embryonic
myogenesis (Lagha et al., 2008). Microarray
data suggested that quiescent adult satellite cells express high levels of
Spry1 with the other Spry family members
present at much lower levels (Fukada et al.,
2007). Importantly, Spry1 expression was found to be
down regulated in cycling myogenic progenitors, raising the possibility that
Spry1 normally inhibits the RTK signals required for the
proliferation of these cells.We used genetic lineage tracing to determine whether the quiescent adult Pax7
cell is capable of replenishing the renewed satellite cell pool and contributing to
myofiber regeneration. In addition, we sought to determine whether
Spry1 is required for homeostasis of the endogenous adult Pax7
satellite cell pool in their native environment during muscle regeneration. We show
that the endogenous population of adult Pax7 cells is capable of replenishing the
satellite cell pool and expands to provide a source of differentiated progeny
contributing to muscle fiber repair. Investigation into the role of
Spry1 revealed that appropriate regulation of reversible
quiescence is essential for self-renewal of the adult Pax7-expressing satellite cell
pool during muscle regeneration.
Results
Endogenous adult Pax7 cells function as muscle stem cells within their native
environment during regeneration
Pax7 is a marker of adult satellite cells and is required for the
formation of the adult satellite cell pool (Seale et al., 2000; Oustanina et
al., 2004). The ability of adult skeletal muscle to undergo numerous
rounds of repair after injury suggests that self-renewal occurs and homeostasis
of the adult muscle satellite cell pool is restored or otherwise maintained
during muscle regeneration after injury. To test this, we quantified the number
of Pax7+ cells within adult skeletal muscle during
regeneration. Tibialis Anterior/Extensor Digitorus Longus
(TA/EDL) muscle was injected with 50μl of 1.2% barium chloride
and left to regenerate from 4-50 days (Figure
1A, S1).
Immunohistochemical analysis revealed a transient expansion of the number of
cycling (MyoD+/Ki67+) (Zammit et al., 2004; Sacco et al., 2008) Pax7+ cells and a diminished
quiescent (MyoD-/Ki67-) Pax7+ pool
between 4-12 days after injury compared to uninjured muscle (Figure 1B). Between 30-50 days after injury, the
quiescent pool of Pax7+ cells, which represented 98%
of the total Pax7 pool, returned to homeostatic levels that were observed in
uninjured muscle. To determine whether Pax7+ cells that
re-occupy the satellite cell position in regenerated fibers had previously
cycled, BrdU was administered during the first 7 days of regeneration and
analyzed in Pax7+ cells. Muscle sections from fully
regenerated muscle showed that 98±0.4% of quiescent
Pax7+ cells (1493/1500, n=4 mice) had
incorporated and retained BrdU and therefore had previously cycled
(BrdU+) during regeneration (Figure 1C). In contrast, Pax7+
cells in uninjured muscle did not have detectable BrdU (data not shown). This
demonstrates that under the injury paradigm used in the present study, the
quiescent Pax7+ satellite cell pool homogeneously enters the
cell cycle during repair, and that both the quiescent state and the size of the
Pax7+ satellite cell pool have been fully restored to
that of uninjured muscle upon completion of muscle repair. This suggests that
the quiescent Pax7+ satellite cell pool is reversibly
quiescent and is under homeostatic control during muscle regeneration. However,
this type of analysis cannot exclude the possibility that
Pax7+ satellite cells in repaired muscle are derived from
another source that subsequently acquired a Pax7 phenotype.
Figure 1
The pool of quiescent Pax7 satellite cells returns to homeostasis during
adult muscle regeneration
(A) Transverse sections of uninjured (0 days after injury) and regenerating
(4, 12, and 50 days after injury) TA muscle contain quiescent
(MyoD-, Ki67-) (green arrowhead) and cycling
(MyoD+, Ki67+; yellow arrowhead)
Pax7+ cells in sublaminar location
(laminin+; magenta). Differentiating myogenic cells
(red arrowhead) could be observed in regenerating muscle underneath the
basal lamina. (B) Total number of Pax7+ cells (left) and
quiescent (Ki67-; MyoD-) Pax7+
cells (right) per muscle section from 4-6 mice per time point (mean
± sem; p<0.05). (C)
BrdU+/Pax7+ cells in transverse
sections from fully regenerated muscle from BrdU-treated mice. Top panel:
Pax7 (red) and DAPI (blue) staining, Bottom panel: BrdU (green) and DAPI
staining. Regenerated muscle fibers are distinguished with
DAPI+ central nuclei (white arrowhead). The contour
of muscle fiber is denoted by white line. Scale bar; 40 μm (A), 80
μm (C).
To investigate directly whether quiescent adult Pax7+
satellite cells have stem cell properties that enable self-renewal and therefore
both return to quiescence as well as contribute to muscle fiber formation
(differentiation) in their endogenous environment, we used mice with an
inducible Pax7-CreER (Nishijo et al., 2009) and a
R26R-lacZ reporter (Soriano, 1999) to genetically lineage trace adult
Pax7+ cells. Tamoxifen (TM) was administered to induce
gene recombination and permanently express β-gal in
Pax7+ cells and their progeny. TA/EDL muscles from one
leg were injured and left to regenerate and the contra-lateral leg remained
uninjured (Figure 2A). In transverse
sections from the uninjured muscle, X-gal reactivity was observed in
mononucleated cells located in the satellite cell position. In the regenerating
muscle, X-gal reactivity was observed in small, de novo muscle
fibers but not in adjacent uninjured fibers. This suggests that adult
Pax7-derived satellite cells are able to contribute to muscle differentiation
in vivo. Fifty days after injury, X-gal+
mononucleated cells were readily detected in the satellite cell position of
regenerated (centrally-nucleated) muscle fibers (Figure 2B). As confirmation that β-gal expression was a
readout of Pax7-derived satellite cells, immunohistochemical analyses from
isolated single muscle fibers from TM treated
Pax7-CreER;R26R-lacZ mice
showed that β-gal expression was observed in ∼84% and
∼87% of Pax7+ satellite cells from uninjured
and regenerated muscle, respectively (Figure 2C,
2D). Together, this data suggests that adult Pax7+
cells are capable of self-renewal and differentiation in their endogenous
environment, and are sufficient to replenish the satellite cell pool in the
regenerating muscle.
Figure 2
Pax7-derived satellite cells are capable of self-renewal and
differentiation
(A) The cartoon depicts the tamoxifen (TM) injection scheme for lineage
tracing muscle satellite cells. Pax7+ satellite cells in
the Pax7-CreER mouse were
permanently labeled by IP administration of TM 14 days prior to muscle
injury. (B) Transverse sections were collected from uninjured and
regenerating muscle and stained with X-gal. Five days after injury non
centrally-nucleated fibers in regenerating muscle had no detectable X-gal
reactivity (*). After 50 days of regeneration,
X-gal+ mononucleated cells were observed in the
satellite cell position of regenerated muscle fibers (black arrows). (C)
Single fibers from uninjured and regenerated
Pax7-CreER muscle stained with
Pax7 (red), β-gal (green) and DAPI (blue). Regenerated muscle fibers
are characterized by DAPI+ ‘central-myonuclear
chains’. (D) The percentage of
β-gal+/Pax7+ satellite
cells expressing on single fibers isolated from uninjured and regenerated
muscle fibers in the presence (+) or absence (-) of Cre or TM. Data
is presented as mean ±sem. n=4-6 mice.
(p<0.05). Scale bars in (B) are 60 μm
(left) and 30 μm (right) and 40 μm in (C).
Sprouty1 expression is restricted to non-cycling Pax7 satellite cells
As RTK/MAPK signaling has been implicated in the process of quiescence
and self-renewal (Jones et al., 2005;
Abou-Khalil et al., 2009), we
characterized the expression dynamics of a candidate gene,
Spry1 (Sprouty1), which encodes a RTK/MAPK regulator (Kim and Bar-Sagi, 2004) and is abundantly
expressed in muscle satellite cells (Fukada et
al., 2007). Myogenic cells were obtained by fluorescent activated
cell sorting (FACS) from uninjured and regenerating adult muscle (Figure 3A, S3). Spry1
transcript was abundantly expressed in myogenic cells isolated from uninjured (0
days) and regenerated muscle (20 and 50 days), when most myogenic cells are
non-cycling (Figure 3A, 1A, S3B). Spry1 levels were reduced in myogenic cells
isolated from muscle tissue at 2, 6 and 12 days after injury, when myogenic
cells are proliferating or differentiating (Figure
3A, 1A, S3B). Therefore,
Sprouty1 expression in myogenic cells is temporally
correlated with a quiescent state and is down regulated during the proliferative
phase of muscle regeneration. To characterize Spry1 expression
in muscle on a cell-by-cell basis, we analyzed mice carrying one copy of a
Spry1lacZ knockin allele
(Spry1+) (Thum et al., 2008) as a readout of
Spry1 expression. In muscle sections from uninjured adult
mice, X-gal+ cells were primarily detected in the
characteristic satellite cell position (Figure
3B). Single muscle fibers isolated from
Spry1+ muscle were fixed
immediately (0 hours) or cultured for 36 hours to activate satellite cells
(Zammit et al., 2004). β-gal
was expressed in 92% of Pax7+ cells
(n=184/197) at 0 hours and in only 8% (n=16/202) of
activated (MyoD+) satellite cells after 36 hours in culture.
We next analyzed β-gal expression in Pax7+ satellite
cells of Spry1+ muscle
during muscle regeneration in vivo (Figure 3C). Spry1 as determined by
β-gal expression was robustly expressed in Pax7+
cells when they are primarily quiescent in uninjured muscle or returning to
quiescence during muscle regeneration (Figure
3D, 1B, S3B). These results confirmed that
Sprouty1 expression was restricted to
Pax7+ cells when they are in a quiescent state.
Figure 3
Sprouty1 is a marker of quiescent Pax7+ satellite
cells
(A) Relative Spry1 transcript levels assessed by real-time
qRT-PCR from FACS-purified myogenic cells (See Figure S3 for FACS sorting and
Ct values) isolated from uninjured and regenerating muscle. (B) Transverse
sections and single muscle fibers from uninjured muscles of
Spry1+ mice were
stained with X-gal (upper panels). X-gal+ mononucleated
cells (blue; black arrows) were observed in the satellite cell position in
muscle sections (left) and single fibers (right). Single fibers from
Spry1+ mice were
stained with anti-β-gal (green) and Pax7 (red) (middle row; white
arrows) or β-gal (green) and MyoD (red) (bottom row; white
arrowhead) after 0 hours or 36 hours in culture. Inset show
β-gal+/Pax7+ cell (middle
row) and β-gal-/ MyoD+/ cell (lower
row). (C) Muscles from
Spry1+
were injured and left to regenerate from 4 to 50 days or remained uninjured.
Muscle sections stained with anti-Pax7 and β-gal is shown from
uninjured and regenerating muscle. Arrows show
Pax7+/β-gal+ cells (at 0
and 30 days after injury) and
Pax7+/β-gal- cells (at 12 days
after injury). (D) Quantitation of (C), showing the percentage of
β-gal+/Pax7+ cells in
muscle sections. Data were presented as mean ± sem. n=4-6
mice. Scale bar in (B) is 80 μm and (C) is 40 μm.
Sprouty1 is required for self-renewal of the quiescent Pax7-derived satellite
cell pool during regeneration
Having established that Cre expression was induced in
resting adult satellite cells and could be used to follow cell fate in
combination with a reporter gene, we employed this system to determine the
molecular regulators of satellite cell self-renewal and homeostasis. To directly
test the role of Sprouty1 in Pax7+ satellite cells during
muscle regeneration. We produced
Pax7-CreER;Spry1;R26R-lacZ
(termed, Satellite Cell-specific Null (SC-Null)) mice to permanently disrupt
Spry1 function in adult Pax7+ satellite
cells upon the administration of TM.
Pax7-CreER;Spry1;R26R-lacZ
mice treated with TM were used as controls. A high degree of recombination was
evident in FACS-purified myogenic cells from SC-Null mice based on expression of
the R26R-lacZ reporter (89%
X-gal+/myogenic cells) and disruption of
Spry1 at both the gene and transcription level (Figure S4). To determine
whether Spry1 was required for the return to quiescence of the
Pax7 satellite cell pool after muscle injury, the total number of
Pax7+ cells and their cycling status, based on MyoD and
Ki67 immunohistochemistry, were determined in TA/EDL muscles from Control and
SC-Null mice that were injured and allowed to regenerate for 50 days.
Contra-lateral muscles that remained uninjured served as internal controls. In
Control animals, the presence of Cre or activation of Cre by TM did not change
the number of Pax7+ cells in the regenerated muscle compared
to the uninjured contra-lateral muscles (Figure
4A), indicating that muscle stem cell homeostasis was restored after
muscle injury as shown previously (Figure
1A). However, in SC-Null muscle, there was a 40% decline in
the number of Pax7+ satellite cells after 50 days of
regeneration compared to the uninjured contra-lateral muscle and the regenerated
Control muscles (Figure 4A), suggesting
Spry1 is essential for homeostasis of the replenished
satellite cell pool. To test whether the remaining Pax7+
cells in SC-Null regenerated muscle were not targeted by Cre or had arisen from
a non-Pax7 origin, we quantified β-gal expression that represented
Pax7-Cre activity prior to muscle injury. In regenerated Control and SC-Null
muscles, 87% and 88% of Pax7+ cells were
β-gal+ respectively, confirming the majority of
the replenished Pax7+ satellite cell pool was derived from
cells of a Pax7 origin (Figure 4B). In
uninjured muscle, Spry1 disruption does not lead to a loss of
Pax7+ satellite cells, therefore we tested whether the
remaining Pax7+ cells in the regenerated SC-Null muscle
responded to the injury stimulus by entering the cell cycle. In both Control and
SC-Null muscle, ∼90% of Pax7+ cells that
replenished the satellite cell niche of the regenerated muscle had entered the
cell cycle during regeneration as indicated by BrdU incorporation (Figure 4C) and had subsequently returned to
quiescence (97±4% and 98±1% of
Pax7+ cells were MyoD-/Ki67- in
Control and SC-Null muscle, respectively). To confirm that the complete loss of
Spry1 would result in a reduced pool of
Pax7+ satellite cells after injury, we injured adult
muscles from Spry1mice that lack Spry1
protein (Figure S5) and
their control littermates,
Spry1++.
Fifty days after injury the number of Pax7+ satellite cells
in Spry1 was reduced by 50%
compared to
Spry1++
Controls (Figure 4D). These results
indicate that homeostasis of the quiescent satellite pool in the absence of
Spry1 is not fully restored after injury and that
Spry1 is essential for self-renewal of approximately half
of the Pax7-derived muscle stem cell pool during muscle regeneration.
Figure 4
Sprouty1 is required for restoring the muscle stem cell pool during
regeneration
(A) Mice were injected with TM to permanently activate Cre in
Pax7-CreER (SC-Null) and
Pax7-CreER;R26R-lacZ
(Control) adult mice. 14 days after TM treatment TA/EDL muscles from one leg
were injured and left to regenerate for 50 days. Muscle sections stained
with anti-Pax7, MyoD, Ki67, laminin and DAPI (Upper panels is shown from
Control and SC-Null regenerated muscle; white arrow heads denote sub-laminar
Pax7 cells). Graphs (lower panels) present the average number of
Pax7+ cells in sub-laminar position. The bar between
each point defines each animal. (p<0.01). (B)
Single muscle fibers from (A) were stained with anti-Pax7 and β-gal
to quantify the percentage of Pax7+ cells expressing
β-gal driven from the Pax7-Cre reporter. (C) BrdU
was administered in (A) during first 10 days after muscle injury. Muscle
sections were stained with anti-BrdU, Pax7 and laminin. Histogram shows the
percentage of BrdU+/Pax7+ cells
satellite cells after 50 days of regeneration. (D) Muscle sections from
Spry1++
and Spry1 were stained with anti-Pax7,
MyoD, Ki67 and laminin (see Figure 4A).
Graphs show the average number of Pax7+ cells in
sub-laminar position in uninjured and regenerated muscle sections of
individual mice. The bar between each point defines each animal. Scale bar;
40 μm.
Sprouty1 regulates a balance between reversible quiescence and
apoptosis
A failure of satellite cells to return to quiescence in the absence of
Spry1 may be due to either an inability to fully expand the
pool of cycling Pax7 cells or altering the fate of these cells during
regeneration from a self-renewing fate to differentiation or apoptosis. To test
this, TA/EDL muscle from TM-treated Control and SC-Null mice were injected and
left to regenerate for 13 days. Muscle sections were analyzed for the number of
Pax7+ cells and differentiated myogenic cells. In SC-Null
muscle the percentage of quiescent Pax7+ cells was reduced by
40%, whereas the percentage of cycling Pax7+ cells
and differentiated (Myogenin+) cells was not altered compared
to Control muscles (Figure 5A, S6). We next analyzed the
number and size of muscle fibers as well as the number of apoptotic myogenic
cells in uninjured and regenerating muscle from Control and SC-Null mice. The
total cross-sectional area of muscle, the total number of muscle fibers (Figure 5B), and the average muscle fiber size
were not different between SC-Null and Control muscles at either 20 or 50 days
after injury compared to regenerating Control muscle (Figure 5C) suggesting that Pax7+
cells with disrupted Spry1 function were not favoring
differentiation at the expense of stem cell homeostasis and that
Spry1 was not required for myogenic differentiation
in vivo. In contrast, there was an increased number of
apoptotic myogenic cells (TUNEL+/MyoD+) in
SC-Null compared to Control regenerating muscle analyzed 20 days after injury
(Figure 5D). Therefore, Sprouty1 is
essential for self-renewal and homeostasis of the quiescent satellite cell pool
but dispensable for muscle fiber differentiation during regeneration.
Figure 5
Disruption of Spry1 in Pax7 cells affects apoptosis but
not differentiation of myogenic cells during regeneration
(A) Quantitative analysis of regenerating muscle (13 days after injury) from
TM-treated Pax7-CreER
(Control) and
Pax7-Cre
(SC-Null) mice. Graph shows the average number of quiescent
(MyoD-, Ki67-) (left panel), cycling
(MyoD+, Ki67+) (middle panel)
Pax7+ cells and differentiated myogenic cells
(Myogenin+) (right panel) in serial sections of TA
muscle. Cell counts are expressed relative to Control muscle. Data were
averaged (n=3 mice per group) and expressed as mean ±sem.
(p<0.05). (B) Quantitative analysis of
uninjured and regenerated muscle from TM-treated Control and SC-Null mice.
Graph shows the average muscle fiber cross-sectional area (top panels) and
the total number of muscle fibers (bottom panels) of uninjured and
regenerated muscle in serial sections from the mid-belly of TA muscle. (C)
TM treated Control
(Pax7-CreER) and
SC-Null (Pax7-CreER)
muscle at 50 days after injury stained with laminin and DAPI (left panels).
Histogram shows the average muscle fiber size in uninjured and regenerated
muscle (n=4 mice per group) and expressed as mean ±sem. (D)
Control and SC-Null muscles described in (C), were stained for TUNEL
(green), MyoD (red), laminin (magenta) and DAPI (left panels).
TUNEL+ cells are located sub- and peri-laminar
position (white arrowheads). Inset:
TUNEL+/MyoD+ nucleus (yellow)
located underneath the basal lamina of a regenerating muscle fiber (white
arrowhead). Histogram (right) shows the number of TUNEL+,
MyoD+ (yellow) and MyoD- (green) cells per
muscle section. Data were averaged (4 mice per group) and expressed as mean
±sem. (p<0.05). Scale bar; 80
μm.
Sprouty1 is required for myogenic progenitors to return to quiescence
The time-course of Spry1 gene expression during
regeneration indicated that Spry1 is rapidly down regulated in
cycling satellite cells after injury and is induced again 12 days after injury
coinciding with the re-emergence of the quiescent phenotype of
Pax7+ satellite cells (Figure 1, 3). We therefore
asked whether Spry1 was required for returning a subset of
cycling myogenic cells to quiescence. Using single muscle fiber suspension
cultures, we analyzed the number of muscle fiber-resident
Pax7+ cells that returned to quiescence (re-quiescence)
after cycling (i.e., self-renew) (Zammit et al.,
2004). The total number of Pax7+ cells per single
muscle fiber was not different between TM treated SC-Null cultures and Control
muscle fiber cultures (Figure
S7). In contrast, the number of quiescent Pax7+
cells per fiber was reduced by 50% in SC-Null compared to Control
cultures. These data provide evidence that Spry1 is required
for reversible quiescence of a sub-population of Pax7+ cells.
We next examined the role of Spry1 in regulating re-quiescence
of satellite cell progenitors using an in vitro
‘reserve’ cell preparation (Yoshida et al., 1998; Perez-Ruiz et
al., 2008) (Figure 6). Low
passage primary myoblasts from Spry1 and
Spry1 muscle were infected with Cre or
Control adenovirus, left to recover for 24 hours and switched to low serum
conditions for 3.5 days. This method reliably achieved 97%
infection/recombination efficiency (Figure S8). Based on
immunocytochemistry, myogenic cells in low serum cultures were characterized as
quiescent (Pax7+, MyoD- and Ki67-),
apoptotic (Activated-Caspase-3+) and differentiated
(Myogenin+) (Figure
6A). After 3.5 days in culture, the percentage of quiescent myogenic
cells decreased and the percentage of apoptotic cells increased in Cre-infected
Spry1 cells (Spry1Null) compared to
Cre-infected Spry1 cells (Control, Figure 6B) and cells treated with Control
virus (data not shown). Neither the percentage of cells expressing the
differentiation marker, Myogenin, nor their ability to fuse was altered by
disruption of Spry1 (Figure
6C). This observation supports our hypothesis that
Spry1 is essential for a subset of myogenic progenitors to
return to a quiescent state, whilst Spry1 appears redundant for
myogenic differentiation. Furthermore, cells expressing the activated form of
Caspase-3 were almost exclusively restricted to the
MyoD+/Myogenin- population of progenitor
cells, suggesting that a cell fate decision between re-quiescence and apoptosis
occurs in myogenic progenitors prior to committing to terminal
differentiation.
Figure 6
Sprouty1 regulates reversible quiescence of a subset of satellite cell
progenitors
(A) Primary myoblasts from
Spry1;R26R-lacZ and
Spry1 mice were
incubated with Cre adenovirus (Control and Spry1Null respectively) and
switched to low mitogen media. Cultures were stained with markers to
determine quiescence (top panel; Pax7+, MyoD-,
Ki67-), differentiation (middle panel;
Myogenin+) and apoptosis (middle panel; activated
Caspase-3). White arrowheads show quiescent cells; white arrows show
differentiated (top panels) and apoptotic (middle panels) cells. Lower panel
shows activated Caspase-3 staining in mononucleated MyoD+
cells. (B) Histograms show that the percentage of quiescent
Pax7+ cells (left), percentage of apoptotic cells
(right) and (C) percentage of differentiated myogenic cells (left) and
ability to fuse (right). (D) MEK inhibitor, U0126 (3 and 10 μM) or
diluent alone (DMSO (-)) was added to
Spry1 (Spry1Null) and
Spry1 (Control) reserve cell
cultures for 2 days. Histogram shows the percentage of quiescent
(Pax7+, MyoD-, Ki67-) cells.
Scale bar; 40 μm.
Consistent with Spry's role as an inhibitor of ERK signaling
(Kim and Bar-Sagi, 2004), we observed
that ERK signaling was up regulated in myogenic cells lacking
Spry1 (Figure S5). We tested whether the inability of cycling myogenic
cells to return to quiescence in the absence of Spry1 as shown
in Figure 6B, was due to elevated ERK
signaling. Cre adenovirus-treated Spry1
(Spry1Null) and Spry1 (Control) cultures were
incubated in low serum conditions to generate ‘reserve’ cells,
in the presence or absence of the MEK inhibitor, U0126. After 3 days in culture,
cells were fixed and analyzed for their quiescence immunophenotype (Figure 6D). The percentage of quiescent cells
increased in Spry1Null cells in the presence of the MEK inhibitor. Moreover, the
percentage of quiescent cells in Spry1Null cultures treated with U0126 was
indistinguishable from Control virus treated
Spry1 cells in the absence of U0126.
Together, this suggests that ERK signaling regulates cell fate decisions
involving reversible quiescence and that Sprouty1 functions primarily through an
ERK-dependent signaling cascade to regulate myogenic progenitor
re-quiescence.
Sprouty1 regulates homeostasis of the self-renewing satellite cell pool
through a subset of cycling Pax7-derived satellite cells
Our data so far suggest that Spry1 function is required
to maintain the quiescent stem cell pool during muscle repair. We next wanted to
test directly whether Spry1 was required for cycling Pax7
satellite cells to re-establish the quiescent Pax7+ satellite
cell pool back to homeostasis during regeneration. We first determined whether
satellite cells that re-occupy the satellite cell position in regenerated muscle
are from a previously cycling population. When BrdU was administrated from 0-7
days after injury, there were ∼98% of Pax7+
cells retaining BrdU label in fully regenerated TM-treated Control and SC-Null
muscle (490 Pax7+/500 BrdU+ and 583
Pax7+/600 BrdU+ respectively,
n=4 individual mice per genotype), suggesting nearly all
Pax7+ cells in regenerated muscle are derived from
Pax7+ satellite cells that have divided during repair. To
identify exactly when Spry1 was required for satellite cell
re-quiescence during muscle regeneration in vivo, we injected
TM into SC-Null and Control mice at distinct times during muscle regeneration
(Figure 7A) and quantified the number
of Pax7+ satellite cells from serial sections of uninjured
and regenerated muscle (Figure 7B). TM was
injected between 16-14 days prior to injury to disrupt Spry1
function in quiescent Pax7+ cells and their progeny or after
injury to target Pax7+ cells in injured muscle that had
entered the cell cycle. In regenerated muscle from TM-treated Control mice, the
average number of Pax7+ cells per muscle section was not
significantly different from the contra-lateral uninjured muscle. TM injected
into SC-Null mice 14 days prior to injury resulted in a 40% loss in the
size of the Pax7+ satellite cell pool in fully regenerated
muscle. Remarkably, a 40% loss in the size of the self-renewed
Pax7+ pool was also observed when TM was injected into
SC-Null mice 7-10 days after muscle injury, thus not affecting
Spry1 function in quiescent Pax7+ cells
prior to injury (Figure 7B). The result is
consistent with a subset of Pax7-derived progenitors providing a source of
satellite cells that require Spry1 expression for their return
to quiescence and homeostasis of the self-renewing Pax7 pool. To test whether
the influence of Spry1 on restoration of the muscle stem cell
pool was temporally restricted during regeneration, we injected TM later during
muscle regeneration (10-12 or 18-20 days after injury). The effect of
Spry1 disruption at later time point was more subtle than
injections at earlier time points, reducing the number of
Pax7+ satellite cells that replenished the regenerated
muscle by ∼30% and ∼5% respectively, compared to
uninjured contra-lateral muscle. The results are consistent with the critical
role of Sprouty1 in conveying temporally coordinated signals within the
regenerating muscle in a subset of Pax7+ satellite cell
descendents that possess self-renewal properties and are essential for
re-establishing homeostasis of the Pax7+ satellite cell pool
during repair.
Figure 7
Return to quiescence and self-renewal is temporally instructed in a
subpopulation of cycling Pax7 satellite cells
(A) Cartoon depicting the TM strategy to induce Cre activation in Control
(Pax7-CreER) and
SC-Null (Pax7-CreER)
mice 14 days prior to injury) or at distinct phases of muscle regeneration.
Muscles were analyzed 50 days after muscle injury. (B) Muscle sections from
experiments depicted in (A) were stained with anti-Pax7, MyoD, Ki67, laminin
and DAPI. Histogram shows the average number of Pax7+
cells per muscle section in regenerated SC-Null muscle expressed relative to
the number of Pax7+ cells in the uninjured contra-lateral
muscle. Data were averaged over a minimum of 4 mice per group and expressed
as mean ± sem. (C) Muscles from
Spry1++
and Spry1 adult mice were injured and
left to regenerate for 13 days. Mice were treated with U0126 or vehicle
(DMSO) via IP injection 10 and 11 days after injury. Histograms show the
number of quiescent Pax7+ satellite cells located
underneath the basal lamina of muscle sections. (D) Mice were subjected to
two rounds of injury (1° and 2°) and 50 days of repair.
Fifty days after the second injury muscle was analyzed for the number of
Pax7+ cells in satellite cell position in
Spry1++
and Spry1 (left panel) and TM-treated
SC-Null and littermate controls (right panel).
(**,p<0.01). (E) The average
muscle fiber size from Control and SC-Null muscles from (D).
We next asked whether inhibition of ERK signaling could prevent the
diminution of the quiescent Pax7+ satellite cell pool in the
absence of Spry1 during muscle regeneration. TA/EDL muscles
from
Spry1++
and Spry1 were injured and allowed to
recover for 13 days. Mice were administered U0126 or vehicle via IP injection at
11 and 12 days after injury. The number of quiescent Pax7+
cells increased in U0126-treated Spry1
muscle in comparison to that observed in Control muscle (Figure 7C). Therefore, Spry1 signals through the ERK
cascade to regulate reversible quiescence of the Pax7 satellite cell pool during
muscle regeneration.The results so far are consistent with a specific sub-population of
quiescent Pax7-derived satellite cells requiring Spry1 for
their self-renewal. We reasoned that the self-renewing
Spry1-“independent” Pax7+
satellite cell pool would self-renew as effectively as Pax7-derived satellite
cells from Control muscles. To test this hypothesis we asked whether upon a
second round of injuries the Pax7+ pool in
Spry1-deficient satellite cells was diminished. At fifty
days after a primary injury, TA/EDL muscle from
Spry1, SC-Null and their respective
Control muscles were exposed to a secondary injury and allowed to recover for a
further 50 days. The number of Pax7+ satellite cells (Figure 7D) and average muscle fiber size
(Figure 7E) was not altered after a
secondary injury compared to the primary injury in Spry1
loss-of-function mutants, similar to their controls. Together, these results
strongly suggest that Sprouty1 is essential for the return to quiescence of a
distinct sub-population of self-renewing Pax7+ muscle stem
cells during muscle regeneration.
Discussion
We undertook a genetic lineage tracing analysis in combination with a
temporally inducible, cell specific gene deletion approach to identify the
endogenous pool of adult muscle stem cells within their native environment, as well
as to determine the molecular regulators of their self-renewal capacity during
muscle regeneration. The results of the current study demonstrate that adult
Pax7-expressing satellite cells can contribute to both de novo
myofiber formation and restoration of the satellite cell pool back to homeostatic
levels after injury. Our studies illustrate a novel role of the RTK inhibitor,
Sprouty1 (Spry1) in adult stem cell function and tissue
homeostasis. We have identified that disruption of Spry1 in adult
Pax7+ cells prevents their return to quiescence and results
in a failure to replenish the satellite cell pool to homeostatic levels after muscle
injury. Spry1 function was limited to a sub-population of Pax7-derived cells able to
control the size of the self-renewing muscle stem cell pool but not their
differentiation potential. Together, these results demonstrate that
Spry1 is an essential regulator of quiescence and homeostasis
of the adult muscle stem cell pool during muscle regeneration.Genetic lineage tracing approaches offer an alternative method to
transplantation assays to track endogenous stem cell populations and their
functional potential within their native environment. Lineage tracing experiments
have shown that nearly all (> 90%) adult quiescent satellite cells
have expressed transcription factors, Pax3, Myf5, MyoD and Pax7 at some point during
their developmental history (Schienda et al.,
2006; Kuang et al., 2007; Kanisicak et al., 2009; Lepper et al., 2009; Brack
et al., 2009). By using an inducible Pax7 Cre allele, it
was recently shown that adult Pax7+ satellite cells are capable
of contributing to muscle fiber repair after multiple rounds of injury, thus
demonstrating their stem cell potential (Lepper et
al., 2009). Using a different inducible Pax7-Cre allele
(Nishijo et al., 2009), we demonstrate
that upon barium chloride-induced muscle injuryPax7-derived cells contribute to
myofiber differentiation and fully restore the renewed satellite cell pool back to
homoeostasis during repair.We demonstrate that Spry1, an inhibitor of growth factor signaling, is
robustly and preferentially expressed in Pax7+ cells in their
quiescent state in uninjured and regenerating muscle in vivo,
suggesting that Spry1 is a marker of Pax7+
satellite cells in their quiescent state (Fukada et
al., 2007). Low levels of Spry1 expression could be
observed in subsets of nascent myotubes in vivo and in
vitro (data not shown) as shown previously (Laziz et al., 2007). This likely reflects that
Spry genes are activated in the presence of growth factors
within the extrinsic milieu and that differentiated myotubes can respond to growth
factor signals (Perez-Ruiz et al., 2007).
That Spry1 expression is elevated and sustained in quiescent
Pax7+ cells compared to either cycling
Pax7+ cells or differentiating myogenic cells suggests
specificity in Spry1 signaling components within myogenic cells of different
fates.The ability of a cell to undergo reversible quiescence is critical for
maintenance of the stem cell pool (Sang et al.,
2008). Depletion of the stem cell pool is often observed in conditions of
maintained proliferation (Orford and Scadden,
2008) and may explain the diminution of the satellite cell pool observed
in muscular dystrophies (Bockhold et al.,
1998; Cerletti et al., 2008). The
mechanism controlling satellite cell self-renewal and the return to quiescence after
proliferation remains incompletely understood. Satellite cell heterogeneity (Kuang et al., 2007), asymmetric inheritance of
fate determinants (Conboy et al., 2007; Shinin et al., 2009) and modulation of
signaling cascades such as Notch, Wnt and MAPK pathways (Jones et al., 2005; Kuang
et al., 2007; Perez-Ruiz et al.,
2008; Abou-Khalil et al., 2009)
have all been proposed to control self-renewal. Precise control of growth factor
sensitive-MAPK/RTK signaling is critical for myogenic fate decisions (Allen et al., 1984; Clegg
et al., 1987; Fedorov et al.,
1998; Jones et al., 2001). We propose
that cycling muscle stem cells traverse through a growth factor-mediated checkpoint
prior to returning to quiescence and in the absence of Spry1
instead appropriate an apoptotic fate decision leading to a diminished pool of
muscle stem cells.Disruption of Spry1 in all cells or specifically in adult
Pax7+ satellite cells in vivo did not affect
the formation or maintenance of the satellite cell pool under homeostatic
conditions, however during muscle regeneration, the renewed Pax7+
satellite cell pool did not return back to homeostatic levels but instead was
50% smaller. In addition, targeting a heterogeneous population
(Pax7-expressing and non-expressing) of myogenic progenitors in
vitro led to a 50% reduction in cells that returned to
quiescence in vitro. Together these data favor the hypothesis that
Spry1 is a major regulator of reversible quiescence and the
ability of Pax7-derived satellite cells to self-renew. Furthermore, the data also
strongly suggests that there is a level of heterogeneity within the renewing
Pax7+ satellite cell compartment, whereby 50% of the
Pax7+ satellite cell pool does not require
Spry1 for its renewal capability. Using a paradigm of repeated
injuries to test self-renewal potential we demonstrate that the remaining
(“Spry1-independent”) population of Pax7-derived satellite cells has
self-renewal potential. Albeit this sub-population of Pax7+ cells
is not sufficient or maybe not required to restore the pool of satellite cells back
to levels observed prior to injury. Further experiments are required to determine
the functional differences between the distinct “Spry1-dependent”
and “Spry1-independent” populations.A reciprocal balance between self-renewal and differentiation within a stem
cell compartment is indicative of a single population of stem cells. Disruption of
Spry1 in Pax7+ cells affected the ability of
the stem cell pool to renew, however we did not observe any reciprocal changes or
alterations in the cells ability to differentiate either in vitro
or in vivo. This suggests that Spry1 function
contributes to define the molecular heterogeneity in adult satellite cells. Muscle
stem cell functional heterogeneity has been proposed based on satellite cells that
progressed through a Myf5 lineage during their developmental
history (Kuang et al., 2007). Adult satellite
cells that have not previously expressed Myf5, based on a readout
from a Myf5 Cre reporter, had a greater self-renewal capacity,
compared to satellite cells from a Myf5 ancestry that had a greater
capacity to differentiate. Disruption of Spry1 within Pax7-derived
satellite cells markedly affected their self-renewing potential, but not their
differentiation; consistent with a requirement for Spry1 in a
sub-population of satellite cells that have high self-renewal potential but low
differentiating potential. An alternative but not mutually exclusive hypothesis is
that other Spry family members or other signaling pathways, such as
the non-canonical Wnt cascade (Le Grand et al.,
2009) coordinate to control self-renewal and differentiation, providing a
level of heterogeneity and maybe cellular specificity at the level of the signaling
pathway.The co-ordination of cell fate decisions involving proliferation and
subsequent differentiation of myogenic progenitors during muscle regeneration are
controlled through an antagonistic relationship between Notch and canonical Wnt
signaling (Brack et al., 2008). Based on
re-expression of Spry1 and the return to quiescence of
Pax7+ satellite cell population in a coordinated manner
during muscle regeneration raised the possibility that re-quiescence of the renewing
stem cell pool was also coordinated in a stage-specific manner, occurring
principally after the majority of satellite cell proliferation and early stages of
differentiation has occurred. We speculate that Spry genes may
fine-tune the dosage and/or duration of extrinsic signals within regenerating tissue
to determine stem cell fate decisions for effective tissue homeostasis and
repair.In conclusion we provide direct genetic evidence that Sprouty1, a gene
essential for embryonic cell fate determination, is an essential regulator of adult
muscle stem quiescence and homeostasis of the self-renewing muscle stem cell pool
during regeneration.
Experimental Procedures Animals
Mice carrying the Spry1 gene flanked by a pair of
loxP sites (Spry1) were used
for tissue specific deletion studies (Basson et al.,
2005). Mice with two copies of Spry1 or
with wild type Spry1 (Spry1) were
crossed with
Pax7-CreER+
mice (Nishijo et al., 2009) to generate
Pax7-CreER
(Satellite cell- specific Spry1Null (SC-Null)) and Control littermates. Experimental
animals were maintained on a CD1 background. Mice were bred to heterozygosity for
Pax7-CreER and homozygosity with the
R26R-lacZ reporter (Soriano,
1999). Spry1mice were maintained on a
FVB background (Thum et al., 2008). Animals
were housed and handled in accordance with the guidelines of the MGH subcommittee
for animal research.
Muscle Injury
Injury to whole TA/EDL muscle was made by injection of barium chloride (50
μl, 1.2%) into 30 sites in the lower limb. This produced an
extensive injury resulting in homogenous damage and activation of satellite cells. A
single intraperitoneal (IP) injections of BrdU (6 μg /gram mouse) was given
followed by BrdU administered ad libitum in drinking water (2.5
mg/ml) for 7-12 days. Muscles were subjected to a secondary injury (50 μl,
1.2% of barium chloride) fifty days after an initial injury and allowed to
recover for a further 50 days. For in vivo manipulation of ERK signaling U0126 (30
mg/kg diluted in 5% DMSO/PBS) or diluent alone (Schuh and Pahl, 2009) was administered via IP injection
11 and 12 days after initial muscle injury.
Myogenic Cell Preparation
Single fiber cultures and satellite cell isolations were performed as
described previously (Zammit et al., 2004;
Brack et al., 2007). To generate
‘reserve cell’ cultures (Yoshida et
al., 1998), low passage primary myoblasts were maintained in growth media
(20% FBS, 5ng/ml bFGF in Ham's F-10 (Mediatech) and switched to
differentiation media (3% HS in DMEM) for 3.5 days at high density
(80-90% confluency). U0126 was added to cultures every 20 hours.
Activation of Cre Recombinase
Low passage myoblasts were infected with adenovirus Ad5CMVCre-eGFP or
Ad5CMV-eGFP-control (Gene Transfer Vector Core, University of Iowa) (diluted 1:1000
in growth media from a stock titer of 1×1010 pfu/ml) for 1.5
hours at 37°C. Cells were washed in PBS and incubated in fresh growth media
for 18 hours and either fixed or re-plated in growth media at equal density for 24
hours and switched to fusion media for 1-4 days. Mice aged 3-4 months were given
intraperitoneal (IP) injections of tamoxifen (TM) (300 μl, 10mg/ml, diluted
in corn oil (Sigma)) daily for 3 days either prior to (12-14 days) or after injury
(ranging from 7-9 to 18-20 days).
Histology and Immunoflourescence
Muscles were dissected and embedded for cryostat sectioning as previously
described (Brack et al., 2007). For analysis
of β-gal activity, TA muscle was fixed in 2% PFA/0.2%
gluteraldehyde and prepared as described previously (Brack et al., 2007). Tissue sections for immunohistochemistry were fixed
in 4% PFA for 10 minutes, washed, permeabilized in 0.2% PBT and
incubated in M.O.M. blocking reagent (10%, Vector) for 30 minutes then in
1% MOM, 10% GS/PBT, for 30 minutes. Sections were stained in Pax7
antibody overnight at 4°C. To reduce background staining of mouse antibody
on regenerating mouse tissue, sections were washed, blocked and incubated in a
‘bridging antibody’ (rat anti-mouseIgG) at 1/500 for 3 hours at
room temperature in addition to rabbit anti-MyoD, rabbit anti-Ki67 and chick
anti-Laminin primary antibodies. Sections were washed, blocked and incubated in
Alexa fluorophore conjugated species-specific anti-IgG antibodies with DAPI for 1 hr
at room temperature. Tissue sections for BrdU detection were fixed in 4%PFA,
washed in PBS and then antigen-retrieved with sodium citrate (10mM, 0.05%
Tween in PBS) at 95°C for 30 minutes. Sections were washed in PBS for 30
minutes and blocked in 10% GS/PBT then incubated with anti-mousePax7 and
anti-ratBrdU overnight at 4°C and secondary antibodies as described above.
Immunofluorescence was performed on fixed cells and fibers (4% PFA, 10 min)
after permeabilization (0.2% PBT; 10 min) and block (10% goat serum
(GS) in PBT). Cells were incubated in primary antibodies overnight at 4°C.
Cells were washed and blocked in 5% GS/PBT then incubated in Alexa
fluorophore-conjugated antibodies and DAPI to visualize nuclei for 1 hr at room
temperature. Antibodies and concentrations used are provided in Supplementary Material. Methods
describing the quantification of muscle regeneration and is provided in Supplementary Material.
Fluorescent Activated Cell Sorting (FACS)
To obtain highly purified myogenic cells, mononucleated cells were isolated
from uninjured and regenerating muscle as described (Brack et al., 2009) with modifications. Cells were incubated in Sorting
media (5% FBS, 10% BlokHen in Hams F10) for 10 min then incubated in
anti-chick-Syn4 and anti mouse-integrin-α7 for 20 minutes. Cells were washed
in sorting media and spun at 1500rpm for 5 min. Cells were stained in CD31-PE,
CD45-PE, anti-chickAlexa688 and anti-mouseAlexa488 for 20 minutes. Myogenic cells
had the following profile: Syn-4+,
Integrin-α7+,CD31-,CD45-,PI-.
Cells were sorted using FACS Aria (BD Biosciences). Protocol modified from (Sacco et al., 2008; Brack et al., 2009). Sorted cells for immunohistochemical
analysis were cytospun immediately after collection. Description of Western blotting
is provided in Supplementary
Material.
Real Time RT-PCR
Approximately 30,000 FACS sorted cells were collected from either uninjured
or regenerating muscle and prepared for qRT-PCR analysis. First-strand cDNA was
directly synthesized from each cell lysate by the SuperScript® III
CellsDirect cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time PCR was
performed on the M×3000P qPCR system (Stratagene), with Brilliant SYBR Green
qPCR master mix (Stratagene) using primers against Spry1 and GAPDH. Primers and
thermal cycler conditions are detailed in the Supplementary Material. Analysis of
genomic recombination of Spry1 open reading frame was performed by
PCR (Basson et al., 2005).
Statistical Analysis
A minimum of 3 and up to 6 replicates was done for all experiments
presented. Data are presented as means and standard errors of the mean. Comparisons
between groups were done using a one way analysis of variance and a Tukey post hoc
test. Comparisons within groups were done using a t-test with repeated measures.
Differences were considered statistically significant at the p
< 0.05 level.
Authors: Koichi Nishijo; Tohru Hosoyama; Christopher R R Bjornson; Beverly S Schaffer; Suresh I Prajapati; Ali N Bahadur; Mark S Hansen; Mary C Blandford; Amanda T McCleish; Brian P Rubin; Jonathan A Epstein; Thomas A Rando; Mario R Capecchi; Charles Keller Journal: FASEB J Date: 2009-03-30 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Peter S Zammit; Jon P Golding; Yosuke Nagata; Valérie Hudon; Terence A Partridge; Jonathan R Beauchamp Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2004-07-26 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Kristen M Kallestad; Sadie L Hebert; Abby A McDonald; Mark L Daniel; Sharon R Cu; Linda K McLoon Journal: Exp Cell Res Date: 2011-01-27 Impact factor: 3.905
Authors: Christopher R R Bjornson; Tom H Cheung; Ling Liu; Pinky V Tripathi; Katherine M Steeper; Thomas A Rando Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 6.277