Literature DB >> 20144433

Institutional blood glucose monitoring system for hospitalized patients: an integral component of the inpatient glucose control program.

Mona Boaz1, Zohar Landau, Zipora Matas, Julio Wainstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to measure patient blood glucose levels at bedside in hospitalized patients and to transmit those values to a central database enables and facilitates glucose control and follow-up and is an integral component in the care of the hospitalized diabetic patient.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of an institutional glucometer employed in the framework of the Program for the Treatment of the Hospitalized Diabetic Patient (PTHDP) at E. Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.
METHODS: As part of the program to facilitate glucose control in hospitalized diabetic patients, an institutional glucometer was employed that permits uploading of data from stands located in each inpatient department and downloading of that data to a central hospital-wide database. Blood glucose values from hospitalized diabetic patients were collected from August 2007 to October 2008. The inpatient glucose control program was introduced gradually beginning January 2008.
RESULTS: During the follow-up period, more than 150,000 blood glucose measures were taken. Mean glucose was 195.7 +/- 99.12 mg/dl during the follow-up period. Blood glucose values declined from 206 +/- 105 prior to PTHDP (August 2007-December 2007) to 186 +/- 92 after its inception (January 2008-October 2008). The decline was associated significantly with time (r = 0.11, p < 0.0001). The prevalence of blood glucose values lower than 60 mg/dl was 1.48% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36%] prior to vs 1.55% (95% CI 0.37%) following implementation of the PTHDP. Concomitantly, a significant increase in the proportion of blood glucose values between 80 and 200 mg/dl was observed, from 55.5% prior to program initiation vs 61.6% after program initiation (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study was designed to observe changes in institution-wide glucose values following implementation of the PTHDP. Information was extracted from the glucometer system itself. Because the aforementioned study was not a clinical trial, we cannot rule out that factors other than introduction of the program could explain some of the variability observed. With these limitations in mind, it nevertheless appears that the PTHDP, of which the institutional glucometer is an integral, essential component, was associated with improved blood glucose values in the hospitalized diabetic patient. 2009 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20144433      PMCID: PMC2769902          DOI: 10.1177/193229680900300523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  24 in total

1.  American College of Endocrinology position statement on inpatient diabetes and metabolic control.

Authors:  Alan J Garber; Etie S Moghissi; Edwin D Bransome; Nataniel G Clark; Stephen Clement; Rhoda H Cobin; Anthony P Furnary; Irl B Hirsch; Philip Levy; Robert Roberts; Greet Van den Berghe; Virginia Zamudio
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Effects of outcome on in-hospital transition from intravenous insulin infusion to subcutaneous therapy.

Authors:  Anthony P Furnary; Susan S Braithwaite
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2007.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Inpatient point-of-care bedside glucose testing: preliminary data on use of connectivity informatics to measure hospital glycemic control.

Authors:  Curtiss B Cook; Etie Moghissi; Renu Joshi; Gail L Kongable; Victor J Abad
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 5.  American College of Endocrinology and American Diabetes Association Consensus statement on inpatient diabetes and glycemic control.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 6.  Subcutaneous insulin: pharmacokinetic variability and glycemic variability.

Authors:  B Guerci; J P Sauvanet
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.041

7.  Glycemic variability: a strong independent predictor of mortality in critically ill patients.

Authors:  James S Krinsley
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Plasma-equivalent glucose at the point-of-care: evaluation of Roche Accu-Chek Inform and Abbott Precision PCx glucose meters.

Authors:  Timothy Ghys; Wim Goedhuys; Katrien Spincemaille; Frans Gorus; Erik Gerlo
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 9.  Costs and benefits of health information technology.

Authors:  Paul G Shekelle; Sally C Morton; Emmett B Keeler
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)       Date:  2006-04

Review 10.  The use of a multidisciplinary team care approach to improve glycemic control and quality of life by the prevention of complications among diabetic patients.

Authors:  Catherine Codispoti; Malinda Reddish Douglas; Tonya McCallister; Armando Zuniga
Journal:  J Okla State Med Assoc       Date:  2004-05
View more
  8 in total

1.  Assessing inpatient glycemic control: what are the next steps?

Authors:  Curtiss B Cook; Kay E Wellik; Gail L Kongable; Jianfen Shu
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 2.  Improvement in inpatient glycemic care: pathways to quality.

Authors:  Joseph A Aloi; Christopher Mulla; Jagdeesh Ullal; David C Lieb
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  Analysis of institutional blood glucose surveillance.

Authors:  Mona Boaz; Zohar Landau; Julio Wainstein
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

Review 4.  Point-of-care blood glucose testing for diabetes care in hospitalized patients: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Rajesh Rajendran; Gerry Rayman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-05

Review 5.  The Case for Diabetes Population Health Improvement: Evidence-Based Programming for Population Outcomes in Diabetes.

Authors:  Sherita Hill Golden; Nisa Maruthur; Nestoras Mathioudakis; Elias Spanakis; Daniel Rubin; Mihail Zilbermint; Felicia Hill-Briggs
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  Improved outcome of patients with diabetes mellitus with good glycemic control in the cardiac intensive care unit: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Kassem Sharif; Suheil Ghadir; Daniela Jakubowicz; Howard Amital; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Abdulla Watad; Julio Wainstein; Yosefa Bar-Dayan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 9.951

7.  Consumption of Nutrition Supplements Is Associated with Less Hypoglycemia during Admission-Results from the MENU Project.

Authors:  Eyal Leibovitz; Fariba Moore; Irina Mintser; Anat Levi; Ron Dubinsky; Mona Boaz
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Electronic dashboard-based remote glycemic management program reduces length of stay and readmission rate among hospitalized adults.

Authors:  Yi-Jing Sheen; Chien-Chung Huang; Shih-Che Huang; Ching-Heng Lin; I-Te Lee; Wayne H-H Sheu
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 4.232

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.