Literature DB >> 20143189

Breast density, scintimammographic (99m)Tc(V)DMSA uptake, and calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) expression in mixed invasive ductal associated with extensive in situ ductal carcinoma (IDC + DCIS) and pure invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC): correlation with estrogen receptor (ER) status, proliferation index Ki-67, and histological grade.

Vassilios Papantoniou1, Evangelia Sotiropoulou, Pipitsa Valsamaki, Angeliki Tsaroucha, Maria Sotiropoulou, Nikolaos Ptohis, Aikaterini Stipsanelli, Konstantinos Dimitrakakis, Spyridon Marinopoulos, Spyridon Tsiouris, Aris Antsaklis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the variation of calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) expression in patients with mixed invasive with extensive in situ ductal carcinomas (IDC + DCIS) and pure IDC, in relation to mammographic breast density (%BD), proliferation-seeking radiotracer (99m)Tc(V) dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) uptake (scintimammographic-SMM), proliferation index Ki-67, and estrogen receptor (ER) status. We also assessed CGRP expression with histological grade.
METHODS: We studied retrospectively 24 women with suspicious findings on mammography who were evaluated preoperatively with (99m)Tc(V)DMSA scintimammography. Histology revealed 12 IDC (grade II in 8, grade III in 4 patients; mean size ± SD, 2.6 ± 1.3 cm; mean age ± SD, 66.5 ± 13.1 years) and 12 IDC + DCIS (grade II in 6, grade III in 6 patients; DCIS component mean size ± SD, 5.3 ± 1.8 cm; IDC component mean size ± SD, 2.5 ± 1.1 cm; mean age ± SD, 58.5 ± 15.1 years). Immunohistochemistry for CGRP, Ki-67, and ER status was performed in all 24 surgical specimens. BD and SMM were calculated by computer-assisted methods and were statistically correlated with CGRP expression. BD, SMM, Ki-67, and ER were statistically compared between IDC and IDC + DCIS, whereas CGRP, Ki-67, and ER were compared between patients with BD >25 and <25%. CGRP was also compared (t test) between grade II and grade III in both groups.
RESULTS: Overall positive correlation was found between BD and CGRP (r = 0.577, P < 0.001). Positive correlation was established between SMM and CGRP only in IDC + DCIS (r (SMM(IDC+DCIS)-CGRP) = 0.634, P < 0.05). CGRP and Ki-67 were significantly higher in patients with BD >25% compared with <25% BD patients (P = 0.00008 and P = 0.014, respectively). BD and SMM were significantly higher in CGRP(+) than in CGRP(-) patients as well as in IDC + DCIS compared with IDC. Ki-67 was significantly higher, whereas ER was significantly lower, in IDC + DCIS than in IDC. In all patients, CGRP was significantly higher in grade II as compared with grade III (P = 0.005). In the mixed group (IDC + DCIS), grade II cancers had also significantly higher CGRP values as compared with grade III ones (P = 0.004). In pure IDC, no statistical difference was found between grade II and III (P = 0.4).
CONCLUSIONS: ΒD, SMM, CGRP, and Ki-67 were significantly increased, whereas ER was significantly decreased, in IDC + DCIS as compared with IDC, indicating that IDC + DCIS is an entity that is more aggressive, ER independent, and possibly associated with a pathway linked to stromal involvement and CGRP activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20143189     DOI: 10.1007/s12282-009-0192-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1340-6868            Impact factor:   4.239


  4 in total

1.  Coexisting ductal carcinoma in situ independently predicts lower tumor aggressiveness in node-positive luminal breast cancer.

Authors:  H Wong; S Lau; R Leung; J Chiu; P Cheung; T T Wong; R Liang; R J Epstein; T Yau
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  The prognostic significance of co-existence ductal carcinoma in situ in invasive ductal breast cancer: a large population-based study and a matched case-control analysis.

Authors:  Hongliang Chen; Fang Bai; Maoli Wang; Mingdi Zhang; Peng Zhang; Kejin Wu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

3.  Is there a difference in FDG PET findings of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast with and without coexisting DCIS?

Authors:  Ismet Sarikaya; Ali Sarikaya; Ahmed N Albatineh; Ebru Tastekin; Yavuz Atakan Sezer
Journal:  Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2020

4.  Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis among patients with pure invasive ductal carcinoma, invasive ductal carcinoma coexisted with invasive micropapillary carcinoma, and invasive ductal carcinoma coexisted with ductal carcinoma in situ: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xin Guan; Guiying Xu; Aiping Shi; Yabin Zou; Yue Zhan; Zhimin Fan; Yi Dong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.