Literature DB >> 20143077

A comparative study examining open inguinal herniotomy with and without hernioscopy to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a pediatric population.

Anindya Niyogi1, Arpan S Tahim, William J Sherwood, Diane De Caluwe, Nicholas P Madden, Robin M Abel, Munther J Haddad, Simon A Clarke.   

Abstract

AIMS: Open herniotomy with or without hernioscopy has been performed in our unit for a decade. Since 2005 the laparoscopic repair was also introduced. The aims of this study were: (1) to compare detection rates for direct visualization of the contralateral deep inguinal ring via the known sac using a 70 degrees scope and via umbilical 30 degrees laparoscopy and (2) to compare operative timings, metachronous and recurrence rates for the three different management pathways for inguinal hernia.
METHODS: A retrospective case note review was carried out over a 29 month period since the introduction of the laparoscopic hernia repair. All patients with inguinal hernia were identified from the work load of six surgeons encompassing the three methods of hernia management. Case notes were retrieved and the data analyzed using SPSS v.17.
RESULTS: A total of 308 patients had 326 hernias performed. Follow-up ranged from 3 months to 1 year (median 8 months). The male-female ratio was 4:1. Of the patients, 12% were neonates; 299 children presented with unilateral hernia. Of those, 164 (55%) children had open herniotomy without contralateral inspection, and 5 (3%) had metachronous hernia; 77 (26%) children had an open herniotomy with 70 degrees hernioscopy; 2 (3%) children, who were considered to have closed contralateral deep inguinal ring during hernioscopy, had metachronous hernia, and 58 (19%) children had a laparoscopic hernia repair and none of them had metachronous hernia. Detection of contralateral patent deep inguinal ring for 70 degrees hernioscopy and 30 degrees laparoscopy was 10 (13%) and 16 (28%), respectively (P = 0.0465). Operative timing was significantly longer for laparoscopic repair (P < or = 0.0001). During the study period there were 11 recurrences; 9 (5%) in the open only group and 2 (3%) in the laparoscopic group.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair are important for discussion as operative methods differ from that of herniotomy. The detection rate of contralateral patent deep inguinal ring appears to be higher for direct visualization via umbilical 30 degrees laparoscopy versus 70 degrees scope via the hernia sac. Whilst laparoscopy offers potential advantage of improved visualization, longer term prospective data collection is needed to compare these methods of operative hernia management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20143077     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-010-2549-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  41 in total

1.  Contralateral groin exploration is not justified in infants with a unilateral inguinal hernia.

Authors:  A Ballantyne; G Jawaheer; F D Munro
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Prospective randomized single-center, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic vs open repair of pediatric inguinal hernia.

Authors:  K L Chan; W C Hui; P K H Tam
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  [Unilateral inguinal hernia in infants: costs, risks and benefits of herniography? Results].

Authors:  O Lucidarme; A S Poisson-Salomon; I Durand-Zaleski; M Gruner; J P Montagne
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  1995-06

4.  Occurrence of contralateral inguinal hernia in children following unilateral inguinal herniotomy.

Authors:  P M R Carneiro; L Rwanyuma
Journal:  East Afr Med J       Date:  2004-11

5.  Selective laparoscopic probing for a contralateral patent processus vaginalis reduces the need for contralateral exploration in inconclusive cases.

Authors:  J D Geiger
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Patent processus vaginalis in the adult as a risk factor for the occurrence of indirect inguinal hernia.

Authors:  R N van Veen; K J P van Wessem; J A Halm; M P Simons; P W Plaisier; J Jeekel; J F Lange
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  [Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in infants].

Authors:  Dan Arbell; Boris Orkin; Raphael Udassin
Journal:  Harefuah       Date:  2007-10

8.  [A survey of the contralateral inguinal hernial sac in infants less than 1 year of age using laparoscopy with anatomic verification using peritoneal radiography or surgery].

Authors:  E Van Glabeke; A Khairouni; M Larroquet; H Kotobi; H Duocou le Pointe; O Jaby; G Audry; C Grapin; M Gruner
Journal:  Chirurgie       Date:  1998-11

9.  Laparoscopic exploration of the contralateral groin in children: an improved technique.

Authors:  M M Fuenfer; R M Pitts; K E Georgeson
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1996-03

10.  Laparoscopic evaluation of the pediatric inguinal hernia--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  D M Miltenburg; J G Nuchtern; T Jaksic; C Kozinetiz; M L Brandt
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.545

View more
  17 in total

1.  Effects of insistent screening for contralateral patent processus vaginalis in laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure to prevent metachronous contralateral onset of pediatric inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Wataru Sumida; Yoshio Watanabe; Hidemi Takasu; Kazuo Oshima; Naoko Komatsuzaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Comparison of laparoscopic hernia repair and open herniotomy in children: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  L L Zhu; W J Xu; J B Liu; X Huang; Z B Lv
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Twenty-year experience with laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in infants and children: considerations and results on 1833 hernia repairs.

Authors:  Ciro Esposito; Maria Escolino; Giuseppe Cortese; Gianfranco Aprea; Francesco Turrà; Alessandra Farina; Agnese Roberti; Mariapina Cerulo; Alessandro Settimi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Systematic review for paediatric metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia: a decreasing concern.

Authors:  Ramesh M Nataraja; Anies A Mahomed
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Comparison of percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) and open repair for pediatric inguinal hernia: experience of a single institution with over 1000 cases.

Authors:  Hiromu Miyake; Koji Fukumoto; Masaya Yamoto; Hiroshi Nouso; Masakatsu Kaneshiro; Hideaki Nakajima; Mariko Koyama; Naoto Urushihara
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Laparoscopic versus open inguinal herniotomy in infants and children: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Alzahem
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Single-port laparoscopic extraperitoneal repair of pediatric inguinal hernias and hydroceles by using modified Kirschner pin: a novel technique.

Authors:  W Liu; R Wu; G Du
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Incarcerated inguinal hernia management in children: 'a comparison of the open and laparoscopic approach'.

Authors:  Pankaj Kumar Mishra; Katherine Burnand; Ashish Minocha; Azad B Mathur; Milind S Kulkarni; Thomas Tsang
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Derivation of a complication burden score based on disability-adjusted life years to assess patient burden following surgery: a pilot study.

Authors:  Sadaf Mohtashami; Nadia Safa; Elena Guadagno; Robert Baird; Dan Poenaru
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Laparoscopic herniotomy in children: prospective assessment of tertiary center experience in a developing country.

Authors:  S M K Shehata; A A El Attar; M A Attia; A M Hassan
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.