| Literature DB >> 20142846 |
Zhensheng Gu1, Baohu Ji, Chunling Wan, Guang He, Juan Zhang, Ming Zhang, Guoyin Feng, Lin He, Linghan Gao.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify the mutant gene for autosomal dominant posterior polar congenital cataract in a four-generation Chinese pedigree.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20142846 PMCID: PMC2817011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Vis ISSN: 1090-0535 Impact factor: 2.367
Figure 1Pedigree and haplotypes of the posterior polar cataract family. Square and circles symbols denote males and females respectively; affected individuals are shaded black; the proband is identified by an arrow. Haplotyping markers are shown at the left of each generation. Black and white bars depict the disease and non-disease associated haplotype respectively. Haplotype analysis defined the causative gene as being between D17S921 and D17S800 on 17p12-21.2.
Figure 2Slit-lamp photograph of the posterior polar cataract taken from patient IV:4 at 25 years of age.
Two point LOD scores for autosomal dominant posterior polar cataract on chromosome 17p.
| D17S799 | 31.96 | −2.67 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.2 |
| D17S900 | 36.14 | 1.45 | 1.15 | 0.83 | 0.50 | 0.21 | 1.45 | 0.0 |
| D17S921 | 36.14 | −3.15 | −0.06 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.2 |
| D17S805 | 47.00 | 1.72 | 1.37 | 1.01 | 0.64 | 0.29 | 1.72 | 0.0 |
| D17S1871 | 48.07 | 1.75 | 1.40 | 1.03 | 0.65 | 0.30 | 1.75 | 0.0 |
| D17S1800 | 51.63 | 2.02 | 1.62 | 1.20 | 0.75 | 0.33 | 2.02 | 0.0 |
| D17S1293 | 56.48 | 1.75 | 1.40 | 1.03 | 0.65 | 0.29 | 1.75 | 0.0 |
| D17S1836 | 60.40 | 1.45 | 1.15 | 0.83 | 0.50 | 0.21 | 1.45 | 0.0 |
| D17S800 | 62.01 | −2.41 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.33 | 0.17 | 0.46 | 0.1 |
| D17S1861 | 63.62 | 0.85 | 0.68 | 0.51 | 0.34 | 0.17 | 0.85 | 0.0 |
Figure 3Sequence analysis of the Chinese pedigree with autosomal dominant posterior polar cataract. A splice site mutation at the first base of intron 3 (G→A) , which is also identified at position 474 in the donor splice junction of intron 3 was co-segrated with all patients in the family, but was not found in the unaffected family members nor in the 50 unrelated control subjects.