Literature DB >> 20142798

The internal dimensions of the cochlear scalae with special reference to cochlear electrode insertion trauma.

Slavomir Biedron1, Andreas Prescher, Justus Ilgner, Martin Westhofen.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the intracochlear micromorphology with regard to frequent patterns of cochlear electrode insertion trauma.
OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implantation is a widely accepted treatment for deafness and high-grade sensorineural hearing loss. Although the device and the implantation methods are continuously optimized, damage of intracochlear structures due to electrode insertion is a frequent finding in temporal bone studies. Reduction of insertional trauma is important for the preservation of residual hearing and on the background of increasing numbers of cochlear implant recipients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed with histologic specimens from the "Wittmaack temporal bone collection" (Hamburg, Germany) to examine the diameters of intracochlear spaces and to correlate the micromorphology of cochlear ducts to frequent patterns of intracochlear insertion trauma.
RESULTS: The diameter of the scala tympani decreases by approximately 300 microm during the ascending part of the basal turn. In this region, the intersegmental decrease exceeds the assumed linear diameter decrease significantly (p < or = 0.001). The regression of the cross-sectional diameter is accompanied by a shift of the spiral osseous lamina toward the scala tympani and by narrowing of the bony capsule of the cochlea.
CONCLUSION: Various attempts have been made to evaluate the dimensions of the cochlea related to cochlear implantation. Little attention was paid to the distinct narrowing of the scala tympani in the region of the ascending part of the cochlear duct, although from the literature, it is known that electrode insertion trauma frequently occurs here. Individual variations of the cochlear micromorphology may additionally contribute to the failure of preformed electrode arrays, but the challenge of guiding the electrode array around the first bend of the cochlear turn, that is, the pars ascendens, is obviously impaired by the interindividually constant narrowing in this area. Therefore, this finding may have implications on the development of electrode designs and insertion methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20142798     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181d27b5e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  17 in total

1.  [Insertion results for Contour™ and Contour Advance™ electrodes: are there individual learning curves?].

Authors:  A Aschendorff; T Klenzner; S Arndt; R Beck; C Schild; L Röddiger; W Maier; R Laszig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Reliability of cone beam computed tomography in scalar localization of the electrode array: a radio histological study.

Authors:  Mathieu Marx; Frank Risi; Bernard Escudé; Irfan Durmo; Christopher James; Frédéric Lauwers; Olivier Deguine; Bernard Fraysse
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Visualization, measurement and modelling of the cochlea using rotating midmodiolar slice planes.

Authors:  G Jakob Lexow; Daniel Schurzig; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Semicircular Canal Pressure Changes During High-intensity Acoustic Stimulation.

Authors:  Anne K Maxwell; Renee M Banakis Hartl; Nathaniel T Greene; Victor Benichoux; Jameson K Mattingly; Stephen P Cass; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Analysis of intersubject variations in intracochlear and middle ear surface anatomy for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Stanley Pelosi; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Experimental Validation of a Three-Dimensional Heat Transfer Model Within the Scala Tympani With Application to Magnetic Cochlear Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Fateme Esmailie; Mathieu Francoeur; Tim Ameel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.756

7.  Cochlear Implant Stimulation of a Hearing Ear Generates Separate Electrophonic and Electroneural Responses.

Authors:  Mika Sato; Peter Baumhoff; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Vestibular Function After Cochlear Implantation in Partial Deafness Treatment.

Authors:  Magdalena Sosna-Duranowska; Grazyna Tacikowska; Elzbieta Gos; Anna Krupa; Piotr Henryk Skarzynski; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Highly Flexible Silicone Coated Neural Array for Intracochlear Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  P Bhatti; J Van Beek-King; A Sharpe; J Crawford; S Tridandapani; B McKinnon; D Blake
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Variations in microanatomy of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Ersin Avci; Tim Nauwelaers; Thomas Lenarz; Volkmar Hamacher; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 3.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.