Literature DB >> 20142732

Randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions.

Forough Farrokhyar1, Paul J Karanicolas, Achilleas Thoma, Marko Simunovic, Mohit Bhandari, P J Devereaux, Mehran Anvari, Anthony Adili, Gordon Guyatt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgical trials pose many methodological challenges often not present in trials of medical interventions. If not properly accounted for, these challenges may introduce significant biases and threaten the validity of the results.
METHODS: We systematically reviewed the significance of randomized controlled trials in the evaluation of surgical interventions, discussed the methodological challenges encountered in designing and conducting randomized controlled trials of surgical treatments, and proposed possible solutions to overcome these challenges.
CONCLUSIONS: Many barriers and issues of surgical trials affecting internal validity can be overcome with proper methodology, and in most cases these issues do not restrict their conduct. Researchers should consider their research question carefully and design a surgical trial that contains features appropriate for the question. In doing so, they must ensure that the trial is valid, feasible, and affordable--a difficult feat, but one well worth the challenge.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20142732     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cf863d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  54 in total

1.  Practical tips for surgical research. Ensuring balanced groups in surgical trials.

Authors:  Forough Farrokhyar; Sohail Bajammal; Kamyar Kahnamoui; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  What can we learn from oncology surgical trials?

Authors:  Serge Evrard; Pippa McKelvie-Sebileau; Cornelis van de Velde; Bernard Nordlinger; Graeme Poston
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Benjamin B Albright; Tilman Witte; Alena N Tofte; Jeremy Chou; Jonathan D Black; Vrunda B Desai; Elisabeth A Erekson
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 4.  Confounding: what is it and how do we deal with it?

Authors:  Luis Henrique P Braga; Forough Farrokhyar; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Why perform a priori sample size calculation?

Authors:  Forough Farrokhyar; Deven Reddy; Rudolf W Poolman; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  A comparison among four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cao Dehong; Liu Liangren; Liu Huawei; Wei Qiang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 7.  What are the levels of evidence on which we base decisions for surgical management of lower extremity bone tumors?

Authors:  Nathan Evaniew; James Nuttall; Forough Farrokhyar; Mohit Bhandari; Michelle Ghert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Surgical evaluation and knowledge transfer--methods of clinical research in surgery.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Thomas Simon; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  How to optimize participant retention and complete follow-up in surgical research.

Authors:  Manrajr Kaur; Sheila Sprague; Teegan Ignacy; Achilles Thoma; Mohit Bhandari; Forough Farrokhyar
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Editorial: Getting the Most from What You Read in Orthopaedic Journals.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.