A M Kilbourne1, C Fullerton, D Dausey, H A Pincus, R C Hermann. 1. Department of Psychiatry, VA Ann Arbor National Serious Mental Illness Treatment Research and Evaluation Center, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. amykilbo@umich.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quality measures can be effective tools for improving delivery of care and patient outcomes. Co-occurring conditions (COCs), including general medical conditions and substance use disorders, are the rule rather than the exception in patients with serious mental health disorders and lead to substantial morbidity and mortality burden. COCs among persons with mental health disorders are often treated by separate systems ("silos") in the US healthcare system, making it difficult to establish expectations for performance, assign accountability for measure results and ultimately improve quality of care for this group. OBJECTIVES: A framework for measuring quality of care for COCs is proposed by reviewing the current state of quality for COCs and examples of quality measures based on the Donabedian model. METHODS AND FRAMEWORK: The framework will also be applied to better define which providers are accountable for quality improvement, to ultimately ensure that quality measures have an impact on improving care for COCs.
BACKGROUND: Quality measures can be effective tools for improving delivery of care and patient outcomes. Co-occurring conditions (COCs), including general medical conditions and substance use disorders, are the rule rather than the exception in patients with serious mental health disorders and lead to substantial morbidity and mortality burden. COCs among persons with mental health disorders are often treated by separate systems ("silos") in the US healthcare system, making it difficult to establish expectations for performance, assign accountability for measure results and ultimately improve quality of care for this group. OBJECTIVES: A framework for measuring quality of care for COCs is proposed by reviewing the current state of quality for COCs and examples of quality measures based on the Donabedian model. METHODS AND FRAMEWORK: The framework will also be applied to better define which providers are accountable for quality improvement, to ultimately ensure that quality measures have an impact on improving care for COCs.
Authors: Danielle F Loeb; Elizabeth A Bayliss; Ingrid A Binswanger; Carey Candrian; Frank V deGruy Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Amy M Kilbourne; Kathryn Beck; Brigitta Spaeth-Rublee; Parashar Ramanuj; Robert W O'Brien; Naomi Tomoyasu; Harold Alan Pincus Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Matthew L Goldman; Brigitta Spaeth-Rublee; Abraham D Nowels; Parashar Pravin Ramanuj; Harold Alan Pincus Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Amy M Kilbourne; Carrie Farmer Teh; Deborah Welsh; Harold Alan Pincus; Elaine Lasky; Brian Perron; Mark S Bauer Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2010-10-30 Impact factor: 3.238