Literature DB >> 20142161

Automatic detection of scoliotic curves in posteroanterior radiographs.

Luc Duong1, Farida Cheriet, Hubert Labelle.   

Abstract

Spinal deformities are diagnosed using posteroanterior (PA) radiographs. Automatic detection of the spine on conventional radiographs would be of interest to quantify curve severity, would help reduce observer variability and would allow large-scale retrospective studies on radiographic databases. The goal of this paper is to present a new method for automatic detection of spinal curves from a PA radiograph. A region of interest (ROI) is first extracted according to the 2-D shape variability of the spine obtained from a set of PA radiographs of scoliotic patients. This region includes 17 bounding boxes delimiting each vertebral level from T1 to L5. An adaptive filter combining shock with complex diffusion is used to individually restore the image of each vertebral level. Then, texture descriptors of small block elements are computed and submitted for training to support vector machines (SVM). Vertebral body's locations are thereby inferred for a particular vertebral level. The classifications of block elements for all 17 SVMs are identified in the image and a voting system is introduced to cumulate correctly predicted blocks. A spline curve is then fitted through the centers of the predicted vertebral regions and compared to a manual identification using a Student t-test. A clinical validation is performed using 100 radiographs of scoliotic patients (not used for training) and the detected spinal curve is found to be statistically similar (p < 0.05) in 93% of cases to the manually identified curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20142161     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2037214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  6 in total

1.  Dynamic ensemble selection of learner-descriptor classifiers to assess curve types in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Edgar García-Cano; Fernando Arámbula Cosío; Luc Duong; Christian Bellefleur; Marjolaine Roy-Beaudry; Julie Joncas; Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  A Review of the Methods on Cobb Angle Measurements for Spinal Curvature.

Authors:  Chen Jin; Shengru Wang; Guodong Yang; En Li; Zize Liang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Current status of use of big data and artificial intelligence in RMDs: a systematic literature review informing EULAR recommendations.

Authors:  Joanna Kedra; Timothy Radstake; Aridaman Pandit; Xenofon Baraliakos; Francis Berenbaum; Axel Finckh; Bruno Fautrel; Tanja A Stamm; David Gomez-Cabrero; Christian Pristipino; Remy Choquet; Hervé Servy; Simon Stones; Gerd Burmester; Laure Gossec
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2019-07-18

4.  A Semi-Automatic Algorithm for Estimating Cobb Angle.

Authors:  Safari A; Parsaei H; Zamani A; Pourabbas B
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2019-06-01

Review 5.  A narrative review of machine learning as promising revolution in clinical practice of scoliosis.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Xiao Zhai; Kaiqiang Sun; Haojue Wang; Changwei Yang; Ming Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

6.  Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: A scoping review.

Authors:  Simon J Federer; Gareth G Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.