Literature DB >> 20142086

Quantifying radiation safety and quality in medical imaging, part 4: the medical imaging agent scorecard.

Bruce I Reiner1.   

Abstract

The Institute of Medicine has determined that adverse drug events (ADEs) are the number one cause of medical errors in the United States and that additional efforts are required to improve patient safety. Medical imaging plays an important role in ADEs, most commonly related to the administration of imaging contrast agents. For medical imaging providers to assume a proactive role in patient safety, the creation of objective, data-driven quality metrics is advocated, which analyze all steps in the drug delivery chain, including procurement, prescription, dispersal, administration, monitoring, and management. These metrics would lead to the creation of a quality scorecard, developed to create objective accountability measures for all actors involved in this chain of events, including pharmacists, radiologists, clinicians, physicists, technologists, administrators, nurses, vendors, and patients. The ultimate goal of such an endeavor is to improve patient safety through the reduction of ADEs and the creation and refinement of data-driven best-practice guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20142086     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.09.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  5 in total

Review 1.  Nuclear medicine: what kind of quality would we want if we were the patient?

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani; Angelo Del Sole
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Improving healthcare delivery through patient informatics and quality centric data.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Innovating through measurement.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Creating accountability in image quality analysis. Part 2: medical imaging accreditation.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  Transforming health care service delivery and provider selection.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.056

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.