Literature DB >> 20141898

Functional outcomes after upper extremity surgery for cerebral palsy: comparison of high and low manual ability classification system levels.

Hyun Sik Gong1, Chin Youb Chung, Moon Seok Park, Hyung-Ik Shin, Moon Sang Chung, Goo Hyun Baek.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The heterogeneity of cerebral palsy makes interpretation and prediction of outcome after upper extremity surgery difficult. We hypothesized that the outcome of upper extremity surgery for cerebral palsy is related to the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) level.
METHODS: We reviewed 27 patients with a mean age of 22 years, who underwent upper extremity surgery for spastic cerebral palsy at a mean follow-up of 29 months. Patients were classified into 5 MACS levels using a standardized questionnaire completed by their primary caregivers. Preoperatively and at most recent follow-up visits, patients were assessed using the House scale and patient-reported functional outcomes on a 5-point scale. We compared the outcomes of patients with high (I-II, independence in daily activities) and low (III-V, dependence in daily activities) MACS levels.
RESULTS: The overall mean House scale improved from 2.9 to 4.6 postoperatively (p<.001), dressing ability from 3.7 to 4.2 (p=.005), hygiene from 4.2 to 4.9 (p=.005), and appearance from 2.4 to 4.2 (p<.001). A total of 13 patients had a high MACS level (7 had I and 6 had II) and 14 had a low MACS level (8 had III, 6 had IV, and none had V). The high-MACS group had a greater improvement according to the House scale (p=.009) and the low-MACS group had a larger improvement in hygiene status (p=.043). There were no differences in the amount of improvement in dressing ability (p=.169) and appearance (p=.765). Overall satisfaction with surgery was higher for the high-MACS group (p=.038).
CONCLUSIONS: The high-MACS group had a greater improvement in rating according to the House scale and higher satisfaction than the low-MACS group after upper extremity surgery for cerebral palsy in our small number of patients. This study suggests that the MACS level can be used to predict upper extremity surgery outcomes for cerebral palsy. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II. Copyright 2010 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20141898     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  3 in total

1.  Review of Therapeutic Interventions for the Upper Limb Classified by Manual Ability in Children with Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Angela Shierk; Amy Lake; Tara Haas
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Barriers to Upper Extremity Reconstruction for Patients With Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Scott N Loewenstein; Francisco Angulo-Parker; Lava Timsina; Joshua Adkinson
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-12-15

3.  Upper limb function evaluation scales for individuals with cerebral palsy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cibele Almeida Santos; Renata Calhes Franco de Moura; Roberta Delasta Lazzari; Arislander Jonathan Lopes Dumont; Luiz Alfredo Ferreira Braun; Claudia Santos Oliveira
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-05-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.