Literature DB >> 20141687

Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic treatment.

Meena Kumari1, Mubassar Fida.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes occurring with extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatments. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparative study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi during the period 2003 to 2005.
METHODOLOGY: Data were collected using records of patients who visited the study setting during the study period. Pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalographs and study casts of 81 orthodontic patients (41=non-extraction and 40=premolar extractions) were taken. Variables used for evaluating vertical dimension were Frankfort mandibular plane angle (FMA), facial height (N-Me), facial height ratio (N-ANS/ANS-Me), soft tissue facial height (G' to Me'), soft tissue facial height ratio (G'-Sn'/zn'-Me'), upper first molar to palatal plane and lower first molar to mandibular plane distance, posterior facial height to anterior facial height ratio (PFH/AFH) and Y-axis. Intercanine, interpremolar and intermolar widths and arch depths were also measured. To evaluate the pre-treatment and posttreatment comparison within each group, paired t-tests were used. For pre- and posttreatment comparisons between the extraction and non-extraction groups, independent sample t-tests were used.
RESULTS: The mean age was 15.8+/-1.5 years for non-extraction and 15.4+/-1.2 years for the extraction group. There was no significant difference in the vertical dimensional changes between extraction and non-extraction treatments as it increased in both groups. When comparing posttreatment arch dimensions, there was an increase in the maxillary intermolar width in the non-extraction group while the intermolar widths and arch depths decreased in the extraction group in both arches.
CONCLUSION: Vertical dimensional changes showed no significant difference between extraction and non-extraction groups. Intermolar widths and arch depths decreased in both arches in the extraction group while the maxillary intermolar width increased in the non-extraction group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20141687     DOI: 01.2010/JCPSP.1721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak        ISSN: 1022-386X            Impact factor:   0.711


  5 in total

1.  Effect of four premolar extractions on the vertical dimension of the face : A retrospective cephalometric study.

Authors:  Anna Rüedi; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Theodore Eliades; Vasiliki Koretsi
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 2.341

2.  Patients' acceptance of corticotomy-assisted orthodontics.

Authors:  Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Stability of changes in mandibular intermolar and intercuspid distances following orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Alimohammad K Motamedi; Sepideh Dadgar; Fatemeh Teimouri; Farzin Aslani
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

4.  Vertical skeletal changes after extraction and non-extraction treatment in matched class I patients identified by a discriminant analysis: cephalometric appraisal and Procrustes superimposition.

Authors:  Philipp Beit; Dimitrios Konstantonis; Alexandros Papagiannis; Theodore Eliades
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.750

5.  Changes of the Mandible after Orthodontic Treatment with and without Extraction of Four Premolars.

Authors:  Tahereh Hosseinzadeh-Nik; Armin Eftekhari; Atefe Saffar Shahroudi; Mahammad Javad Kharrazifard
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2016-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.