Literature DB >> 2014096

Caring for our future: a report by the expert panel on the content of prenatal care.

M G Rosen1, I R Merkatz, J G Hill.   

Abstract

The report of the Expert Panel on Prenatal Care entitled Caring for Our Future: The Content of Prenatal Care was presented to the Assistant Secretary for Health, James Mason, MD, on October 2, 1989. The Panel noted the need for attention not only to the mother and fetus, but also to the infant and family. Besides traditional medical care concerns, the importance of psychosocial and environmental patient and family needs was emphasized. The Panel felt that the addition of the pre-conception visit to routine prenatal care made care more effective. Suggestions as to visit timing and content were made. The Panel noted the need for further understanding of many of the activities performed routinely in prenatal care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2014096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  12 in total

1.  Quantifying the adequacy of prenatal care: a comparison of indices.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Closing the Black-White gap in birth outcomes: a life-course approach.

Authors:  Michael C Lu; Milton Kotelchuck; Vijaya Hogan; Loretta Jones; Kynna Wright; Neal Halfon
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.847

3.  Improving prediction of preterm birth using a new classification scheme and rule induction.

Authors:  J W Grzymala-Busse; L K Woolery
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1994

Review 4.  Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ebony B Carter; Lorene A Temming; Jennifer Akin; Susan Fowler; George A Macones; Graham A Colditz; Methodius G Tuuli
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Machine learning for an expert system to predict preterm birth risk.

Authors:  L K Woolery; J Grzymala-Busse
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Are prenatal care resources distributed efficiently across high-risk and low-risk mothers?

Authors:  Sankar Mukhopadhyay; Jeanne Wendel
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2008-05-22

7.  Proposed framework for making focused antenatal care services accessible: a review of the nigerian setting.

Authors:  John Ekabua; Kufre Ekabua; Charles Njoku
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-12-29

8.  Late entry to antenatal care in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Lieu Thuy Thi Trinh; George Rubin
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 3.223

9.  Group versus traditional prenatal care in low-risk women delivering at term: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  E B Carter; K Barbier; R Sarabia; G A Macones; A G Cahill; M G Tuuli
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Number of prenatal visits and pregnancy outcomes in low-risk women.

Authors:  E B Carter; M G Tuuli; A B Caughey; A O Odibo; G A Macones; A G Cahill
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.521

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.