Literature DB >> 20140642

Do Medicare Advantage enrollees tend to be admitted to hospitals with better or worse outcomes compared with fee-for-service enrollees?

Bernard Friedman1, H Joanna Jiang.   

Abstract

The hospitals selected by or for Medicare beneficiaries might depend on whether the patient is enrolled in a Medicare Advantage (MA) plan. A theoretical model of profit maximization by MA plans takes into account the tradeoffs of consumer preferences for annual premium versus outcomes of care in the hospital and other attributes of the plan. Hospital discharge databases for 13 states in 2006, maintained by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, are the main source of data. Risk-adjusted mortality rates are available for all non-maternity adult patients in each of 15 clinical categories in about 1,500 hospitals. All-adult postoperative safety event rates covering 9 categories of events are calculated for surgical cases in about 900 hospitals. Instrumental variables are used to address potential endogeneity of the choice of a MA plan. The key findings are these: enrollees in MA plans tend to be treated in hospitals with lower resource cost and higher risk-adjusted mortality compared to Fee-for-Service (FFS) enrollees. The risk-adjusted mortality measure is about 1.5 percentage points higher for MA plan enrollees than the overall mean of 4%. However, the rate of safety events in surgical patients favors MA plan enrollees--the rate is 1 percentage point below the average of 3.5%. These discrepant results are noteworthy and are plausibly due to greater discretion by the health plan in approving patients for elective surgery and as well as selecting hospitals for surgical patients. Emergency patients are generally excluded for the safety outcome measures. In addition, the current mortality measures may not adequately represent all surgical patients. Such caveats should be prominently highlighted when presenting comparative data. With that proviso, the study justifies informing Medicare beneficiaries about the mortality and safety outcome measures for hospitals being used by a MA plan compared to hospitals used by FFS enrollees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20140642     DOI: 10.1007/s10754-010-9076-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ        ISSN: 1389-6563


  10 in total

1.  Do Medicare HMOs still reduce health services use after controlling for selection bias?

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Sally C Stearns; Edward C Norton
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Variations in patterns of care and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction for Medicare beneficiaries in fee-for-service and HMO settings.

Authors:  Harold S Luft
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Medicare payment for selected adverse events: building the business case for investing in patient safety.

Authors:  Chunliu Zhan; Bernard Friedman; Andrew Mosso; Peter Pronovost
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  A national profile of patient safety in U.S. hospitals.

Authors:  Patrick S Romano; Jeffrey J Geppert; Sheryl Davies; Marlene R Miller; Anne Elixhauser; Kathryn M McDonald
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Health maintenance organizations and hospital quality for coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  J J Escarce; R L Van Horn; M V Pauly; S V Williams; J A Shea; W Chen
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  The impact of medical errors on ninety-day costs and outcomes: an examination of surgical patients.

Authors:  William E Encinosa; Fred J Hellinger
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Do patient safety events increase readmissions?

Authors:  Bernard Friedman; William Encinosa; H Joanna Jiang; Ryan Mutter
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization.

Authors:  Chunliu Zhan; Marlene R Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Pre-enrollment reimbursement patterns of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in "at-risk" HMOs.

Authors:  P W Eggers; R Prihoda
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1982-09
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Managed care and inpatient mortality in adults: effect of primary payer.

Authors:  Anika L Hines; Susan O Raetzman; Marguerite L Barrett; Ernest Moy; Roxanne M Andrews
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  A Quantitative Observational Study of Physician Influence on Hospital Costs.

Authors:  Herbert Wong; Zeynal Karaca; Teresa B Gibson
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.