| Literature DB >> 20140264 |
Marcus K Drotz1, Tomas Brodin, Anders N Nilsson.
Abstract
The Agabus bipustulatus complex includes one of Europe's most widely distributed and common diving beetles. This complex, which is known for its large morphological variation, has a complex demographic and altitudinal variation in elytral reticulation. The various depth of the reticulation imprint, both in smaller and larger meshes, results in both mat and shiny individuals, as well as intermediate forms. The West Palearctic lowland is inhabited by a sexually dimorphic form, with shiny males and mat females. In mountain regions, shiny individuals of both sexes are found intermixed with mat individuals or in pure populations in central and southern areas, whereas pure populations of mat individuals are exclusively found in the northern region at high altitude. Sexual selection is proposed as a driving force in shaping this variation. However, the occurrence of different types of reticulation in both sexes and disjunct geographical distribution patterns suggest an additional function of the reticulation. Here we investigate the phylogeographical history, genetic structure and reticulation variation of several named forms within the Agabus bipustulatus complex including A. nevadensis. The molecular analyses recognised several well-supported clades within the complex. Several of the named forms had two or more independent origins. Few south European populations were uniform in reticulation patterns, and the males were found to display large variation. Reticulation diversity and population genetic variability were clearly correlated to altitude, but no genetic differences were detected among populations with mixed or homogenous forms. Observed reduction in secondary reticulation in female and increased variance in male at high altitude in South Europe may be explained by the occurrence of an additional selective force, beside sexual selection. The combined effect of these selective processes is here demonstrated in an extreme case to generate isolation barriers between populations at high altitudes. Here we discuss this selective force in relation to thermal selection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20140264 PMCID: PMC2815794 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Agabus bipustulatus secondary elytral reticulation patterns.
(1) Reticulation classified as type A and found within the topotypic male bipustulatus form, (2) as type B found within kiesenwetterii, (3) as type G found within the pyrenaeus form. Reticulation classes are coded as in table 2.
Agabus bipustulatus classification of secondary elytral reticulation after the total sample was screened for common patterns.
| Code | Description |
| A | Longitudinally elongated meshes more or less straight, narrow and a majority are long. Isomorphic meshes can be observed at the elytral apex. |
| B | Longitudinally elongated meshes more or less straight, wide and a majority are long. Isomorphic meshes are observed commonly at the elytral apex and occasionally along the anterior parts of the elytra suture. |
| C | Longitudinally elongated meshes more or less straight, wide and a majority are short. |
| D | Longitudinally elongated meshes more or less straight, wide and a majority are long. Isomorphic meshes are observed from elytral apex to ½ or ¾ of its length. |
| E | Longitudinally elongated meshes more or less straight, wide and a majority are long. Isomorphic meshes are observed from elytral apex to ½ or ¾ of its length and at the anterior parts of the suture. |
| F | Longitudinally elongated meshes more or less straight to ½ of elytral length after that the meshes bend out towards suture ¼ from apex. Isomorphic meshes at the elytral apex and along anterior parts of the suture. |
| G | Isomorphic meshes cover the whole elytra, giving an impression that the longitudinally elongated meshes bend out towards suture ¼ from apex. |
Seven categories (A-G) ranging from tightly packed longitudinally elongated meshes to more or less isomorphic meshes were recognised in Agabus bipustulatus. Type A is found in the bipustulatus and solieri forms, type B in kiesenwetterii, falcozi and dolomitanus, and type C, F and G in pyrenaeus. The categories D, E and F describe intermixed patterns.
Sampled species and collection sites along with their respective locality code.
| Species | Country | Locality | Locality code | Collector | Map code |
|
| Sweden | Västerbotten; Umeå, Nydalasjön | Aff1 | AN | |
|
| France |
|
| MD |
|
|
|
| MD |
| ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
| Iceland | Eyjafjörður sýsla; Akureyri airport | BipIce1 | SE | 15 | |
| Eyjafjörður sýsla; South of Akureyri | BipIce2 | SE | 16 | ||
| Iran | Fars; Shiraz | BipIra1 | SH | 17 | |
| Italy |
|
| MD |
| |
| Morocco | Tafraoute; Oued Åit Baha Ait Iftene | BipMor1 | IR | 19 | |
| Portugal | Guarda; Sa da Estrele | BipPor1 | IR | 20 | |
| Portalegre, Serra de São Mamede | BipPor2 | IR | 21 | ||
| Russia | Volgograd Oblast; Volgograd | BipRus1 | AN | 22 | |
| Volgograd Oblast; Volgograd | BipRus2 | AN | 23 | ||
| Spain | Tortosa; El Pinell de Brai | BipEsp1 | MD | 24 | |
| Catalonia, Coll de Perves | BipEsp2 | MD | 25 | ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
|
|
| MD |
| ||
| Granada; Sierra Nevada, Hotel del Buque | BipEsp8 | CSC | 31 | ||
| Sweden | Lycksele lappmark; Tärna, Atoklinten | BipSwe1 | MD | 32 | |
| Lycksele lappmark; Tärna, Djuptjärn | BipSwe2 | MD | 33 | ||
| Lycksele lappmark; Tärna, Gröndal | BipSwe3 | MD | 34 | ||
| Lycksele lappmark; Tärna, Stintbäcken | BipSwe4 | MD | 35 | ||
| Lycksele lappmark; Lycksele, Näslandsmyren | BipSwe5 | MD | 36 | ||
| Lycksele lappmark; Tärna, Kråkberget | BipSwe6 | MD | 37 | ||
|
| Sweden | Ångermanland; Nordmaling, Mullsjö | Gutt1 | AN | |
|
| Sweden | Lycksele lappmark; Tärna, Atoklinten | Mel1 | MD | |
| Ångermanland; Nordmaling, Hummelholm | Mel2 | MD | |||
|
| Sweden | Skåne; Potten | Neb1 | BA | |
| Skåne; Revinge by | Neb2 | BA | |||
|
| Spain | Granada; Sierra Nevada, Laguna de Rio seco | Nev1 | MD | |
| Granada; Sierra Nevada, Laguna de la Caldera | Nev2 | MD | |||
|
| Canada | Alberta; Hinton | Tri1 | JB | |
| Alberta; Sundre | Tri2 | JB | |||
| Alberta; Sundre | Tri3 | JB | |||
|
| Portugal | Madeira; Pico do Arierio | Woll1 | MD | |
| Madeira; Rabacal | Woll2 | MD |
Collectors of the populations/specimens are: Anders Nilsson (AN), Bertil Andrén (BA), Carmen E. Sainz Cantero (CSC), Ignacio Ribera (IR), Johannes Bergsten (JB), Marcus K. Drotz (MD), Stefan Ericsson (SE), and Shidi O. Hosseinie (SH). Map codes are given for A. bipustulatus collection sites, which are shown in figure 2. Collection sites in bold were used both in the morphological and population genetic studies.
Figure 2Agabus bipustulatus collecting sites.
Map codes and corresponding locality codes are given in table 1.
Agabus bipustulatus population variation of secondary elytral reticulation.
| Locality code | Alt | Males | Females | ||||||||||||||||
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
| ||||
| BipFra1 | 2750 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 21 | ||||||
| BipFra2 | 2640 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 24 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25 | ||||||
| BipFra3 | 2080 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 13 | 13 | ||||||||||||
| BipFra4 | 1820 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 14 | ||||||||||||||
| BipFra5 | 2040 | 6 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 30 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 18 | ||||||||
| BipFra6 | 1049 | 30 | 30 | 28 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
| BipFra7 | 1580 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
| BipFra8 | 2080 | 21 | 4 | 25 | 27 | 27 | |||||||||||||
| BipFra9 | 2240 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 16 | 16 | ||||||||||||
| BipFra10 | 2250 | 5 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 28 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||
| BipFra11 | 2450 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 26 | 22 | 3 | 25 | |||||||||
| BipFra12 | 2560 | 2 | 22 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||
| BipFra13 | 2638 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 19 | |||||||||||
| BipFra14 | 2225 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 25 | 19 | 19 | ||||||||||||
| BipIta1 | 2207 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||
| BipEsp3 | 2070 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| BipEsp4 | 2465 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||
| BipEsp5 | 2500 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 15 | ||||||||||
| BipEsp6 | 2250 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| BipEsp7 | 2440 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
Male and female variation is given separately in different columns. Total number of specimens (N), altitude (Alt) is given in meters above sea level, and locality codes follow table 1. Elytral reticulation codes follow table 2.
Figure 3Relationship between male secondary elytral reticulation diversity and altitude in Agabus bipustulatus.
Reticulation diversity was estimated with the Simpson diversity index (D) based on the data given in table 3. Low index value (1-D) indicates small level of variation in the secondary reticulation. Geographically close populations are connected with lines. Altitude is given in meters. Locality codes follow table 1.
Summary of genetic variability in Agabus bipustulatus.
| Locality code | Mean ind./locus | Mean # of alleles / locus |
| Mean heterozygosity ± SE |
| BipFra1 | 26±1 | 2.3±0.4 | 0.437 | 0.192±0.04 |
| BipFra2 | 26±1 | 2.1±0.4 | 0.363 | 0.201±0.07 |
| BipFra3 | 18±1 | 2.6±0.6 | 0.258 | 0.295±0.07 |
| BipFra4 | 16±1 | 2.3±0.3 | 0.282 | 0.235±0.05 |
| BipFra5 | 42±2 | 2.5±0.5 | 0.298 | 0.246±0.06 |
| BipFra6 | 39±3 | 3.1±0.4 | 0.276 | 0.258±0.07 |
| BipFra7 | 11±1 | 1.9±0.2 | 0.095 | 0.299±0.09 |
| BipFra8 | 37±4 | 3.0±0.6 | 0.333 | 0.221±0.06 |
| BipFra9 | 11±2 | 2.3±0.4 | 0.530 | 0.158±0.05 |
| BipFra10 | 34±5 | 2.8±0.6 | 0.234 | 0.260±0.06 |
| BipFra11 | 36±6 | 2.0±0.3 | 0.328 | 0.211±0.06 |
| BipFra12 | 40±4 | 2.1±0.4 | 0.324 | 0.196±0.05 |
| BipFra13 | 13±2 | 2.3±0.5 | 0.342 | 0.198±0.06 |
| BipFra14 | 29±3 | 2.8±0.5 | 0.330 | 0.227±0.07 |
| BipIta1 | 9±1 | 1.8±0.3 | 0.358 | 0.198±0.08 |
| BipEsp3 | 13±1 | 2.1±0.2 | 0.260 | 0.274±0.04 |
| BipEsp4 | 14±1 | 2.1±0.2 | 0.353 | 0.199±0.04 |
| BipEsp5 | 22±1 | 2.1±0.2 | 0.476 | 0.148±0.04 |
| BipEsp6 | 12±1 | 2.3±0.3 | 0.251 | 0.293±0.05 |
| BipEsp7 | 6±1 | 1.8±0.2 | 0.203 | 0.193±0.08 |
Including mean number of successfully scored individuals per population over all loci, mean number of alleles per locus including ±1 standard error (SE), mean observed heterozygosity estimated as direct count including ±1 SE, and inbreeding coefficient per population measured by F . Locality codes follow table 1.
Figure 4Relationship between observed mean heterozygosity and estimated inbreeding over populations, and altitude in Agabus bipustulatus.
Estimated (•) observed mean heterozygosity (R = 0.185, P = 0.033); (○) estimated inbreeding coefficient (F IS) over populations (R = 0.168, P = 0.041). Altitude is given in meters.
Figure 5Strict consensus tree from parsimony analysis of Agabus bipustulatus complex plus outgroups.
The combined unweighted parsimony analysis includes all three genes (cytochrome b, cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and cytochrome oxidase II) and the outgroup species Agabus nebulosus, A. affinis and A. guttatus. Number of fundamental trees = 13. Bootstrap values above 50% are reported above branches. Bremer support values are reported below branches. Locality codes follow table 1.
Figure 6tree from parsimony analysis of Agabus bipustulatus complex.
The “best” fundamental tree, according to Kishino and Hasegawa test, from combined unweighted parsimony analysis of all three genes (cytochrome b, cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and cytochrome oxidase II), rooted with Agabus bipustulatus specimen from BipRus1 in order to visualise the deep split within the complex (group I and II), and to display unambiguous unique character state transformations, marked with (•), and homoplasious character state transformations with (○). Bootstrap values above 50% are reported above branches.
Figure 7Maximum likelihood representation of sequence data from Agabus bipustulatus complex.
Likelihood representation including all three genes (cytochrome b, cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and cytochrome oxidase II). The translational model (TIM) was used along with a proportion of invariable sites equal to 0.8199 and a gamma distribution shape parameter of 0.7877. The tree is rooted with the Agabus bipustulatus specimen from BipRus1 in order to visualise the deep split within the complex (group I and II). Jackknife values above 50% are reported above branches.