| Literature DB >> 20140076 |
Abstract
New rapid, sensitive, and accurate kinetic speEntities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20140076 PMCID: PMC2814128 DOI: 10.1155/2009/307045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Anal Chem ISSN: 1687-8760 Impact factor: 1.885
Figure 1Absorption spectra of OMZ (1), iodine, 0.20 mg mL−1 in 1,2-dichloroethane (2), DDQ, 0.40 mg mL−1 in acetonitrile (3), OMZ-iodine complex in 1,2-dichloroethane at 25 ± 2°C (4), and OMZ-DDQ complex in acetonitrile at 25 ± 2°C (5). Concentrations of OMZ were 30.00, 1.50, and 20.00 μg mL−1 for the absorption spectra numbers (1), (4), and (5), respectively.
Scheme 1
Scheme 2
Figure 2Absorption spectra of OMZ-DDQ complex as a function of time. The complex was generated by carrying out the reaction of OMZ (20.00 μg mL−1) with DDQ (0.40 μg mL−1) in acetonitrile at 25 ± 2°C.
Figure 3The absorbance-time curve for the reaction of OMZ at 25 ± 2°C with (a) iodine (0.20 mg mL−1) at 362 nm; the concentrations of OMZ were 1.45 × 10−6 (⋄), 2.90 × 10−6 (◆), 4.35 × 10−6 (∆), 5.80 × 10−6 (▴), 7.25 × 10−6 (°), and 8.70 × 10−6 M (●), and (b) DDQ (0.40 mg mL−1) at 418 nm; the concentrations of OMZ were 0.73 × 10−5 (●), 1.45 × 10−5 (°), 2.90 × 10−5 (▴), 5.80 × 10−5 (∆), 8.70 × 10−5 (◆), and 1.15 × 10−4 M (⋄).
Optimum conditions for the charge-transfer reaction of OMZ with both iodine and DDQ reagents.
| Conditions | Iodine method | DDQ method |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptor conc. (mg mL−1) | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| Solvent | 1,2-Dichloroethane | Acetonitrile |
| Reaction time (min) | 45 | 5 |
| Temperature (°C) | 25 ± 2 | 25 ± 2 |
|
| 362 | 418 |
Figure 4The most energy-minimized conformation of OMZ-DDQ charge-transfer complex.
Scheme 3Kinetic parameters obtained from Benesi-Hildebrand, Arrhenius, and first-order linear plots of OMZ-acceptor CT complexes at the specific λ max and reaction temperature.
| Kinetic parameters | Iodine method | DDQ method |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation coefficient ( | 0.9995 | 0.9999 |
| Order of CT reaction ( | 0.87 | 0.99 |
| Specific rate constant, s−1( | 5.45 | 56.18 |
| Activation energy, kcal mol−1 (Ea)♠ | −1.54 | −1.95 |
| Activation entropy change, kcal mol−1°C (Δ | −69.96 | −66.44 |
| Molar absorptivity, l · mol−1 cm−1( | 21.12 | 6.89 |
| Standard free energy change, kcal mol−1(Δ | −5.91 | −4.80 |
| Association constant, l · mol−1( | 21.50 | 3.33 |
♠ : Negative sign of Ea indicates that the CT complex is decomposed by increasing temperature.
Analytical parameters for the proposed kinetic initial rate methods for determination of OMZ.
| Analytical parameters | Iodine method | DDQ method |
|---|---|---|
| Linear range (mol) | 0.73–8.70 × 10−6 | 1.45–72.4 × 10−6 |
| (0.25–3.00)a | (0.50–25.00) | |
| Least square equation | ||
| (Log | ||
|
| 2.68 ± 0.10 | 3.36 ± 0.03 |
|
| 0.87 ± 0.02 | 0.99 ± 0.01 |
|
| 0.9990 | 0.9996 |
| LODc (mol) | 0.24 × 10−6 (0.08) | 0.41 × 10−6 (0.14) |
| LOQc (mol) | 0.73 × 10−6 (0.25) | 1.22 × 10−6 (0.42) |
a Figures in parenthesis are the quantities in μg mL−1.
b V is the reaction rate, K′ is the conditional rate constant, n is the order of reaction, and C is the molar concentration of OMZ.
c To simplify the calculation of both LOD and LOQ, the simple nonlogarithmic equations [V = 0.001(±0.00015) + 2093(±45)C] and [V = 0.002(±0.00027) + 2391(±39)C] were used for both iodine and DDQ methods, respectively, where V is the reaction rate and C is the molar concentration of OMZ.
Analytical parameters for the proposed fixed time methods for determination of OMZ.
| Method | Time | Range |
| Slope | Intercept | LOD | LOQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (min) | ( | (b) ± SD | (a) ± SD | ( | ( | ||
| Iodine | 5 | 1.50–12.00 | 0.9915 | 0.0751 ± 0.0049 | 0.0226 ± 0.0095 | 0.42 | 1.27 |
| 15 | 0.50–6.00 | 0.9955 | 0.1589 ± 0.0017 | 0.0060 ± 0.0073 | 0.15 | 0.46 | |
| 25 | 0.40–5.00 | 0.9992 | 0.2198 ± 0.0044 | 0.0064 ± 0.0085 | 0.13 | 0.39 | |
| 35 | 0.30–4.00 | 0.9995 | 0.2649 ± 0.0042 | 0.0323 ± 0.0061 | 0.08 | 0.23 | |
| 45 | 0.10–3.00 | 0.9990 | 0.3069 ± 0.0067 | 0.0693 ± 0.0032 | 0.03 | 0.10 | |
|
| |||||||
| DDQ | 1 | 10.00–120.00 | 0.9982 | 0.0065 ± 0.0002 | 0.0013 ± 0.0065 | 3.28 | 9.94 |
| 2 | 5.00–60.00 | 0.9992 | 0.0155 ± 0.0001 | 0.0097 ± 0.0028 | 0.59 | 1.80 | |
| 3 | 3.00–40.00 | 0.9993 | 0.0249 ± 0.0006 | 0.0246 ± 0.0036 | 0.48 | 1.45 | |
| 4 | 2.50–30.00 | 0.9992 | 0.0320 ± 0.0007 | 0.0305 ± 0.0017 | 0.18 | 0.53 | |
| 5 | 0.60–25.00 | 0.9998 | 0.0366 ± 0.0004 | 0.0299 ± 0.0021 | 0.19 | 0.57 | |
Evaluation of the accuracy of the proposed initial rate and fixed time methods for determination of OMZ.
| Method | Amount taken ( | Recovery (% ± RSD)a | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial rate method | Fixed time method | ||
| Iodine | 0.50 | 99.50 ± 1.95 | 100.40 ± 0.94 |
| 1.50 | 98.80 ± 1.08 | 99.80 ± 0.25 | |
| 3.00 | 99.70 ± 1.55 | 98.50 ± 0.42 | |
|
| |||
| DDQ | 2.00 | 98.60 ± 1.45 | 99.60 ± 1.84 |
| 10.00 | 98.90 ± 0.95 | 100.80 ± 0.75 | |
| 20.00 | 100.30 ± 0.75 | 100.20 ± 1.25 | |
a Recovery was calculated as the amount found/amount taken ×100. Values are mean ± RSD for five determinations.
Determination of OMZ in presence of common excipients by the proposed fixed time methods.
| Ingredient | Recovery (% ± SD)a | |
|---|---|---|
| Iodine method | DDQ method | |
| Starch (50)b | 99.26 ± 0.39 | 98.86 ± 0.66 |
| Glucose (10) | 99.42 ± 1.02 | 99.33 ± 1.53 |
| Lactose (10) | 100.49 ± 1.35 | 101.11 ± 1.45 |
| Acacia (10) | 101.02 ± 0.75 | 100.85 ± 0.64 |
| MSc (10) | 99.31 ± 0.96 | 98.94 ± 0.75 |
|
| ||
| Average ± SD | 99.90 ± 0.80 | 99.82 ± 1.08 |
| Pool SD | 0.89 | 1.01 |
a Values are mean of three determinations.
b Figures in parenthesis are the amounts in mg added per 20 mg of OMZ.
c MS = Magnesium stearate.
Determination of OMZ in its dosage forms by the proposed methods.
| Dosage form | Label claim (% ± SD)a | ||||
| Initial rate method | Fixed-time method | Referencec method | |||
| Iodine | DDQ | Iodine | DDQ | ||
|
| |||||
| Gastrazole capsules | 99.82 ± 1.65 | 98.91 ± 1.78 | 100.24 ± 1.84 | 99.20 ± 1.53 | 100.40 ± 1.34 |
|
| 0.63 | 1.51 | 0.2 | 1.32 | |
|
| 1.52 | 1.76 | 1.89 | 1.30 | |
|
| |||||
| Losec tablets | 99.41 ± 1.24 | 99.70 ± 1.13 | 100.32 ± 0.94 | 99.93 ± 1.13 | 100.90 ± 1.18 |
|
| 1.96 | 1.64 | 0.14 | 0.64 | |
|
| 1.10 | 1.09 | 0.63 | 0.92 | |
a Values are mean of five determinations.
b The tabulated values of t and F at 95% confidence limit are 2.78 and 6.39, respectively.
c Reference [12].