PURPOSE: Stress-induced cardiovascular reactivity is associated with the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. This study tested whether a simulated active commute to school dampened cardiovascular reactivity to a cognitive stressor typical to what children might experience during school. METHODS:Forty children (20 girls and 20 boys) aged 10-14 yr were randomly assigned to simulated sedentary drive-to-school or active-commute (walking) groups. The walking group completed a self-paced 1.6-km walk on a treadmill while images from a real 1.6-km walk through a pleasant neighborhood that finished at a school were projected in front of them. The drive-to-school group sat in a chair and watched the same slideshow of images of the neighborhood environment. Standardized residualized gain scores of cardiovascular reactivity during a cognitive stressor, the Stroop task, were calculated and used as dependent variables. RESULTS: Children in the walking group self-selected a walking intensity of 60.6% +/- 1.6% HRmax and covered the 1.6-km distance in 21.5 +/- 0.5 min. Children in the walking group had lower HR (2 +/- 1 vs 11 +/- 1 bpm, P < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (4 +/- 1 vs 12 +/- 1 mm Hg, P < 0.001), pulse pressure (-4 +/- 1 vs 6 +/- 1 mm Hg, P < 0.001), and perceived stress (1.4 +/- 0.1 vs 3.0 +/- 0.1 cm, P < 0.001) reactivities to cognitive stress than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Active commuting to school may dampen cardiovascular reactivity and perceived stress when confronted with stressful cognitive challenges during the school day. This may help reduce the risk for cardiovascular disease later in life.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Stress-induced cardiovascular reactivity is associated with the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. This study tested whether a simulated active commute to school dampened cardiovascular reactivity to a cognitive stressor typical to what children might experience during school. METHODS: Forty children (20 girls and 20 boys) aged 10-14 yr were randomly assigned to simulated sedentary drive-to-school or active-commute (walking) groups. The walking group completed a self-paced 1.6-km walk on a treadmill while images from a real 1.6-km walk through a pleasant neighborhood that finished at a school were projected in front of them. The drive-to-school group sat in a chair and watched the same slideshow of images of the neighborhood environment. Standardized residualized gain scores of cardiovascular reactivity during a cognitive stressor, the Stroop task, were calculated and used as dependent variables. RESULTS:Children in the walking group self-selected a walking intensity of 60.6% +/- 1.6% HRmax and covered the 1.6-km distance in 21.5 +/- 0.5 min. Children in the walking group had lower HR (2 +/- 1 vs 11 +/- 1 bpm, P < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (4 +/- 1 vs 12 +/- 1 mm Hg, P < 0.001), pulse pressure (-4 +/- 1 vs 6 +/- 1 mm Hg, P < 0.001), and perceived stress (1.4 +/- 0.1 vs 3.0 +/- 0.1 cm, P < 0.001) reactivities to cognitive stress than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Active commuting to school may dampen cardiovascular reactivity and perceived stress when confronted with stressful cognitive challenges during the school day. This may help reduce the risk for cardiovascular disease later in life.
Authors: Redford B Williams; Douglas A Marchuk; Ilene C Siegler; John C Barefoot; Michael J Helms; Beverly H Brummett; Richard S Surwit; James D Lane; Cynthia M Kuhn; Kishore M Gadde; Allison Ashley-Koch; Ingrid K Svenson; Edward C Suarez; Saul M Schanberg Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2007-12-24 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Fernando Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Oscar Pakomio Jara; Norman Macmillan Kuthe; Manuel Herrador-Colmenero; Robinson Ramírez-Vélez; Palma Chillón Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christine Delisle Nyström; Joel D Barnes; Sébastien Blanchette; Guy Faulkner; Geneviève Leduc; Negin A Riazi; Mark S Tremblay; François Trudeau; Richard Larouche Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Richard Larouche; Jean-Philippe Chaput; Geneviève Leduc; Charles Boyer; Priscilla Bélanger; Allana G LeBlanc; Michael M Borghese; Mark S Tremblay Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Suliane B Rauber; Daniel A Boullosa; Ferdinando O Carvalho; José F V N de Moraes; Ioranny R C de Sousa; Herbert G Simões; Carmen S G Campbell Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Eero A Haapala; Anna-Maija Poikkeus; Katriina Kukkonen-Harjula; Tuomo Tompuri; Niina Lintu; Juuso Väistö; Paavo H T Leppänen; David E Laaksonen; Virpi Lindi; Timo A Lakka Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 3.240