Literature DB >> 20139450

Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: testing a two-process model.

Brian A Anderson1, Charles L Folk.   

Abstract

Although large variations in the magnitude of attentional capture have been evidenced across a wide range of studies and paradigms (see Burnham, 2007, for a review), the nature of these variations is unclear. In the present study, we used a modified spatial cuing task to address two related issues. In the first experiment, we explored the hypothesis that the magnitude of attentional capture varies systematically as a function of cue-target similarity. Targets of a particular color were preceded by uninformative peripheral cues carrying varying percentages of the target color. As was predicted, the magnitude of attentional capture varied directly with the similarity between cue and target. In the second experiment, we explored whether these similarity effects reflect a mixture of trials on which attention is fully captured and trials on which attention is not captured at all (i.e., a two-process model). A mixture analysis conducted on obtained reaction time distributions proved inconsistent with a two-process model.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20139450     DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.2.342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  19 in total

1.  Contingent capture in cueing: the role of color search templates and cue-target color relations.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-06-27

2.  Value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Patryk A Laurent; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Reward and attentional control in visual search.

Authors:  Steven Yantis; Brian A Anderson; Emma K Wampler; Patryk A Laurent
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

Review 4.  A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Selection history is relative.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Controlled information processing, automaticity, and the burden of proof.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

8.  On the precision of goal-directed attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Spatial attention during saccade decisions.

Authors:  Donatas Jonikaitis; Anna Klapetek; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Context-dependent sequential effects of target selection for action.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.