Literature DB >> 20138473

Reliability of visual assessment of global and segmental left ventricular function: a multicenter study by the Israeli Echocardiography Research Group.

David S Blondheim1, Ronen Beeri, Micha S Feinberg, Mordehay Vaturi, Sarah Shimoni, Wolfgang Fehske, Alik Sagie, David Rosenmann, Peter Lysyansky, Lisa Deutsch, Marina Leitman, Rafael Kuperstein, Ilan Hay, Dan Gilon, Zvi Friedman, Yoram Agmon, Yossi Tsadok, Noah Liel-Cohen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this multicenter study was to determine the reliability of visual assessments of segmental wall motion (WM) abnormalities and global left ventricular function among highly experienced echocardiographers using contemporary echocardiographic technology in patients with a variety of cardiac conditions.
METHODS: The reliability of visual determinations of left ventricular WM and global function was calculated from assessments made by 12 experienced echocardiographers on 105 echocardiograms recorded using contemporary echocardiographic equipment. Ten studies were reread independently to determine intraobserver reliability.
RESULTS: Interobserver reliability for visual differentiation between normal, hypokinetic, and akinetic segments had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.70. The intraclass correlation coefficient for dichotomizing segments into normal versus other abnormal was 0.63, for hypokinetic versus other scores was 0.26, and for akinetic versus other scores was 0.58. Similar results were found for intraobserver reliability. Interobserver reliability for WM score index was 0.84 and for left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.78. Similar values were obtained for the intraobserver reliability of WM score index and ejection fraction. Compared to angiographic data, the accuracy of segmental WM assessments was 85%, and correct determination of the culprit artery was achieved in 59% of patients with myocardial infarctions.
CONCLUSION: Among experienced readers using contemporary echocardiographic equipment, interobserver and intraobserver reliability was reasonable for the visual quantification of normal and akinetic segments but poor for hypokinetic segments. Reliability was good for the visual assessment of global left ventricular function by WM score index and ejection fraction. Copyright (c) 2010 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20138473     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  13 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of Echocardiography, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, and Computed Tomographic Imaging for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Function: Part 1 (Global Assessment).

Authors:  Menhel Kinno; Prashant Nagpal; Stephen Horgan; Alfonso H Waller
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Automatic classification of left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities in echocardiography images using nonrigid image registration.

Authors:  Ahmad Shalbaf; Hamid Behnam; Zahra Alizade-Sani; Maryam Shojaifard
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Left ventricle wall motion quantification from echocardiographic images by non-rigid image registration.

Authors:  Ahmad Shalbaf; Hamid Behnam; Zahra Alizade-Sani; Maryam Shojaifard
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Longitudinal two-dimensional strain for the diagnosis of left ventricular segmental dysfunction in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Amnon Eitan; Izhak Kehat; Diab Mutlak; Gershom Lichtenberg; Dina Amar; Yoram Agmon
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Regional dynamics of fractal dimension of the left ventricular endocardium from cine computed tomography images.

Authors:  Ashish Manohar; Lorenzo Rossini; Gabrielle Colvert; Davis M Vigneault; Francisco Contijoch; Marcus Y Chen; Juan C Del Alamo; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-11-08

6.  Quantifying "normalized" regional left ventricular contractile function in ischemic coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Matthew C Henn; Brian P Cupps; Julia Kar; Kevin Kulshrestha; Danielle Koerner; Alan C Braverman; Michael K Pasque
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Agreement between visually estimated left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiography and quantitative measurements using cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Kerim Esenboğa; Mustafa Kılıçkap; Elif Peker; Volkan Kozluca; Çiğdem Koca; Cansın Tulunay Kaya; Demet Menekşe Gerede Uludağ; İrem Dinçer
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.596

8.  Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Normalized Multiparametric Myocardial Strain Predicts Contractile Recovery.

Authors:  Matthew C Henn; Christopher P Lawrance; Julia Kar; Brian P Cupps; Kevin Kulshrestha; Danielle Koerner; Kathleen Wallace; Susan Joseph; Greg Ewald; Michael K Pasque
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 9.  Left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes: it depends on the imaging method.

Authors:  Peter W Wood; Jonathan B Choy; Navin C Nanda; Harald Becher
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.724

10.  Cardiac Index by Transthoracic Echocardiography (CITE) study.

Authors:  Barna Szabó; Eszter Krisztina Marosi; Katarina Vargová; Noémi Nyolczas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.