Literature DB >> 20138346

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with pelvic/aortic lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer--a consecutive series without case selection and comparison to laparotomy.

Scott M Eisenkop1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine feasibility of duplicating operative time and nodal yield of "open" procedures by using laparoscopy for clinically localized endometrial cancer without case selection and eliminating influence of BMI on conversion.
METHODS: In this retrospective study 210 consecutive patients were laparoscoped between July, 2006 and November, 2009 to perform total laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingoophorectomy and pelvic/aortic lymph node dissection (TLH/BSO/LND) using pulsed bipolar cautery to complete all phases of the procedure. Outcomes ("Scope" group) are compared to historic consecutive TAH/BSO/LND controls ("Open" group) operated on 2004-2009 and "open" series in the literature.
RESULTS: Two hundred (95.2%) procedures were completed laparoscopically, 3 (1.4%) required a minilaparotomy to remove the uterus, and 7 (3.3%) were converted to complete the hysterectomy with some portion of LND. There was no influence of BMI (P=0.688), age (P=0.748) or the number of prior abdominal operations (P=0.875) on probability of conversion (Logistic regression). The mean age, BMI, number of prior abdominal procedures, and GOG performance status were equivalent in both study groups. The mean operative time was 139.5 min (IQR 125-152) for the "Scope" group and 128.4 min (IQR 105-124) for the "Open" group (P=0.008). The mean nodal yield was 34.7 (IQR 24-40) for the "Scope" group and 25.7 (IQR 18-30) for the "Open" group (P<0.001). The mean hospital stay was 3.2 days (IQR 2-4) for the "Scope" group and 7.9 days (IQR 5-9) for the "Open" group (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: For clinically localized endometrial cancer, TLH/BSO/LND can functionally duplicate operative time equivalent to "open" procedures, while improving nodal yield, and minimizing influence of BMI on conversion to laparotomy and case selection. Copyright (c) 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20138346     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.12.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  4 in total

1.  Nationwide rates of conversion from laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy to open abdominal hysterectomy in Germany.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Ray M Merrill; Oliver Kuss
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 2.  The incidence of postoperative symptomatic lymphocele after pelvic lymphadenectomy between abdominal and laparoscopic approach: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jong Ha Hwang; Bo Wook Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: increasing body mass index does not impact postoperative complications.

Authors:  C William Helm; Cibi Arumugam; Mary E Gordinier; Daniel S Metzinger; Jianmin Pan; Shesh N Rai
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Could the Long-Term Oncological Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer also Be Valid for the High-Intermediate- and High-Risk Patients? A Multi-Center Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group Study Conducted with 2745 Endometrial Cancer Cases. (TRSGO-End-001).

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Vardar; Ahmet Baris Guzel; Salih Taskin; Mete Gungor; Nejat Ozgul; Coskun Salman; Umran Kucukgoz-Gulec; Ghanim Khatib; Cagatay Taskiran; Ilkkan Dünder; Firat Ortac; Kunter Yuce; Cosan Terek; Tayup Simsek; Aydın Ozsaran; Anil Onan; Gonca Coban; Samet Topuz; Fuat Demirkiran; Ozguc Takmaz; M Faruk Kose; Ahmet Gocmen; Gulsah Seydaoglu; Derya Gumurdulu; Ali Ayhan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.