Literature DB >> 20138338

The impact of income and education on dietary habits in stone formers.

Daniel T Saint-Elie1, Perene V Patel, Kelly A Healy, Tania Solomon, John G Pattaras, Jing Qian, Viraj A Master, Kenneth Ogan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on dietary habits in stones formers (SF) as there is an obvious association between dietary habits and risks of urolithiasis.
METHODS: SF were selected to complete the Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ) and an SES questionnaire. Meaningful dietary constituents were generated from DHQ raw data. SF were considered of lower SES if they had less than 12 years of education and lived below the poverty level.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine SF completed the DHQ and SES questionnaires. Thirty-seven SF had low education, whereas 62 high education levels. Significant mean dietary constituents by education level (lower vs higher) were calcium (1058.4 vs 705.0 mg/d), carbohydrate (394.9 vs 253.4 g/d), cholesterol (398.7 vs 253.4 mg/d), dietary fiber (24.6 vs 17.9 g/d), food energy (3307.9 vs 2051.5 kcal/d), phosphorus (1903.9 vs 1220.1 mg/d), potassium (4195.6 vs 2861.5 mg/d), and sodium (5136.8 vs 3050.5 mg/d) (P <.05). Thirty-four SF were below the poverty level and 60 above it. Significant mean dietary constituents by annual income (below vs above poverty level) were carbohydrate (397.6 vs 259.3 g/d), dietary fiber (26.1 vs 17.8 g/d), magnesium (481.8 vs 316.7 mg/d), and potassium (4141.9 vs 3031.6 mg/d), (P <.05).
CONCLUSIONS: SES impacts dietary habits and this may strongly influence stone formation and recurrence. Therefore, dietary counseling and modification as prevention for further stone formation should be more emphasized in SF of lower SES. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20138338     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of stone disease across the world.

Authors:  Igor Sorokin; Charalampos Mamoulakis; Katsuhito Miyazawa; Allen Rodgers; Jamsheer Talati; Yair Lotan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  [Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for urolithiasis].

Authors:  F Praus; M Schönthaler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Dietary habits in women with recurrent idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Tiziana Meschi; Antonio Nouvenne; Andrea Ticinesi; Beatrice Prati; Angela Guerra; Franca Allegri; Federica Pigna; Laura Soldati; Giuseppe Vezzoli; Giovanni Gambaro; Fulvio Lauretani; Marcello Maggio; Loris Borghi
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 5.531

4.  Knowledge, awareness and dietary practice on urolithiasis among general population in Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia: Preliminary findings.

Authors:  Siti Noorkhairina Sowtali; Siti Roshaidai Mohd Ariffin; Nor Syawanidamia Nazli; Nor Azwani Binti Mohd Shukri; Muhammad Muzaffar Ali Khan Khattak; Islah Munjih Ab Rashid; Suhana Binti Muhamad; Fatin Noraliah Adzali
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2021-04-14

5.  Associations between interventions for urolithiasis and urinary tract cancer among patients in Taiwan: The effect of early intervention.

Authors:  Chien-Liang Lin; Wen-Tsung Huang; Wen-Chou Fan; Yin-Hsun Feng; Chia-Ho Lin; Chian-Shiung Lin; Chih-Cheng Lu; Tse-Chou Cheng; Chao-Jung Tsao; Sheng-Hsiang Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Eleven-year Cumulative Incidence and Estimated Lifetime Prevalence of Urolithiasis in Korea: a National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort Based Study.

Authors:  Bum Sik Tae; Ulanbek Balpukov; Sung Yong Cho; Chang Wook Jeong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.153

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.