Literature DB >> 20138068

Opponent recognition and social status differentiate rapid neuroendocrine responses to social challenge.

Travis J Ling1, Cliff H Summers, Kenneth J Renner, Michael J Watt.   

Abstract

Individual social status discriminates rapid neuroendocrine responses to non-social stress in male Anolis carolinensis, but whether such status-influenced reactions are retained in response to subsequent social stress is unknown. Dominant and subordinate males modify their behavioral responses to social challenge according to familiarity of the opponent, suggesting that accompanying neuroendocrine responses may differ according to opponent recognition despite social rank. We examined endocrine and neurochemical correlates of prior social status and opponent recognition during the opening stages of social challenge. Male pairs interacted and established dominant/subordinate status, followed by 3 days separation. Subsequently, subjects were paired with either the same opponent or an unfamiliar male according to rank (dominant with subordinate). After 90 s of social exposure, subjects were caught and brains and plasma collected for measurement of circulating corticosterone and limbic monoamines. Controls included pairs experiencing just one 90 s encounter plus a group of non-interacting subjects. Opponent recognition differentiated status-influenced responses, such that dominant lizards paired with familiar subordinate opponents had increased hippocampal dopamine and epinephrine, but showed increased plasma corticosterone and ventral tegmental area (VTA) norepinephrine when challenged with an unfamiliar opponent. Subordinate lizards encountering familiar opponents also had increased corticosterone, along with decreased hippocampal dopamine and increased VTA epinephrine, but showed no changes in response to an unfamiliar opponent. Such plasticity in status-influenced rapid neuroendocrine responses according to opponent recognition may be necessary for facilitating production of behavioral responses adaptive for particular social contexts, such as encountering a novel versus familiar opponent. (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20138068      PMCID: PMC2840053          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  40 in total

Review 1.  Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology.

Authors:  J M Koolhaas; S M Korte; S F De Boer; B J Van Der Vegt; C G Van Reenen; H Hopster; I C De Jong; M A Ruis; H J Blokhuis
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Involvement of dopamine D(2) receptors in complex maze learning and acetylcholine release in ventral hippocampus of rats.

Authors:  H Umegaki; J Munoz; R C Meyer; E L Spangler; J Yoshimura; H Ikari; A Iguchi; D K Ingram
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 3.  Individual variation in coping with stress: a multidimensional approach of ultimate and proximate mechanisms.

Authors:  Jaap M Koolhaas; Sietse F de Boer; Bauke Buwalda; Kees van Reenen
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Noradrenergic long-term potentiation in the dentate gyrus.

Authors:  C W Harley
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol       Date:  1998

5.  Stress induces rapid changes in central catecholaminergic activity in Anolis carolinensis: restraint and forced physical activity.

Authors:  R Parrish Waters; Aaron J Emerson; Michael J Watt; Gina L Forster; John G Swallow; Cliff H Summers
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Rapid neuroendocrine responses evoked at the onset of social challenge.

Authors:  Michael J Watt; Gina L Forster; Wayne J Korzan; Kenneth J Renner; Cliff H Summers
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-12-20

7.  Effects of excitatory amino acid antagonists on social recognition of male rats.

Authors:  Z. Hlinák; I. Krejcí
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.293

8.  5-HT2- and D1-mechanisms of the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala enhance conditioned fear and impair unconditioned fear.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Macedo; Raquel Chacon Ruiz Martinez; Lucas Albrechet-Souza; Victor Alejandro Molina; Marcus Lira Brandão
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Somatic correlates of adrenergic activity during aggression in the lizard, Anolis carolinensis.

Authors:  C H Summers; N Greenberg
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Social stress and corticosterone regionally upregulate limbic N-methyl-D-aspartatereceptor (NR) subunit type NR(2A) and NR(2B) in the lizard Anolis carolinensis.

Authors:  W N Meyer; J Keifer; W J Korzan; C H Summers
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  4 in total

1.  Coexisting lacertid lizard species Podarcis siculus and Podarcis melisellensis differ in dopamine brain concentrations.

Authors:  Barbara Nikolic; Paula Josic; Davorka Buric; Mirta Tkalec; Duje Lisicic; Sofia A Blazevic; Dubravka Hranilovic
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Social status alters defeat-induced neural activation in Syrian hamsters.

Authors:  K E Morrison; D W Curry; M A Cooper
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 3.  Evolution of stress responses refine mechanisms of social rank.

Authors:  Wayne J Korzan; Cliff H Summers
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2021-04-21

4.  Exposure to advertisement calls of reproductive competitors activates vocal-acoustic and catecholaminergic neurons in the plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus.

Authors:  Christopher L Petersen; Miky Timothy; D Spencer Kim; Ashwin A Bhandiwad; Robert A Mohr; Joseph A Sisneros; Paul M Forlano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.