Literature DB >> 20136875

Formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Part 1. Characterization, frequency and relevance of sensitization, and frequency of use in cosmetics.

Anton C de Groot1, Ian R White, Mari-Ann Flyvholm, Gerda Lensen, Pieter-Jan Coenraads.   

Abstract

In this part of a series of review articles on formaldehyde-releasers and their relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy, formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics are discussed. In this first part of the article, key data are presented including frequency of sensitization and of their use in cosmetics. In Europe, low frequencies of sensitization have been observed to all releasers: 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol 0.4-1.2%, diazolidinyl urea 0.5-1.4%, imidazolidinyl urea 0.3-1.4%, quaternium-15 0.6-1.9% (for DMDM hydantoin no recent data are available). All releasers score (far) higher prevalences in the USA; the possible explanations for this are discussed. The relevance of positive patch test reactions has been insufficiently investigated. In the USA, approximately 20% of cosmetics and personal care products (stay-on products: 17%, rinse-off products 27%) contain a formaldehyde-releaser. The use of quaternium-15 is decreasing. For Europe, there are no comparable recent data available. In the second part of the article, the patch test relationship of the releasers in cosmetics to formaldehyde contact allergy will be reviewed and it will be assessed whether products preserved with formaldehyde-releasers may contain enough free formaldehyde to pose a threat to individuals who have contact allergy to formaldehyde.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20136875     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01615.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  8 in total

1.  Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Patch Testing Beyond the TRUE Test.

Authors:  Jenny L Nelson; Christen M Mowad
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2010-10

2.  Formaldehyde may be found in cosmetic products even when unlabelled.

Authors:  Laura Malinauskiene; Audra Blaziene; Anzelika Chomiciene; Marléne Isaksson
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2015-07-07

Review 3.  Cosmetics Preservation: A Review on Present Strategies.

Authors:  Noureddine Halla; Isabel P Fernandes; Sandrina A Heleno; Patrícia Costa; Zahia Boucherit-Otmani; Kebir Boucherit; Alírio E Rodrigues; Isabel C F R Ferreira; Maria Filomena Barreiro
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Cutaneous acceptability of a moisturizing cream in subjects with sensitive skin.

Authors:  Jane Snatchfold
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Skin safety and health prevention: an overview of chemicals in cosmetic products.

Authors:  A Panico; F Serio; F Bagordo; T Grassi; A Idolo; M DE Giorgi; M Guido; M Congedo; A DE Donno
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2019-03-29

6.  Imidazolidinyl urea activates mast cells via MRGPRX2 to induce non-histaminergic allergy.

Authors:  Jiapan Gao; Delu Che; Xueshan Du; Yi Zheng; Huiling Jing; Nan Wang
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.524

7.  Skin acceptability of a cosmetic moisturizer formulation in female subjects with sensitive skin.

Authors:  Stephanie J Nisbet
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2018-04-30

8.  NMR analyses on N-hydroxymethylated nucleobases - implications for formaldehyde toxicity and nucleic acid demethylases.

Authors:  S Shishodia; D Zhang; A H El-Sagheer; T Brown; T D W Claridge; C J Schofield; R J Hopkinson
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.876

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.