Literature DB >> 20136566

Efficacy of contraceptive methods: A review of the literature.

Diana Mansour1, Pirjo Inki, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide a comprehensive and objective summary of contraceptive failure rates for a variety of methods based on a systematic review of the literature.
METHODS: Medline and Embase were searched using the Ovid interface from January 1990 to February 2008, as well as the reference lists of published articles, to identify studies reporting contraceptive efficacy as a Pearl Index or life-table estimate. Reports that recruited less than 400 subjects per study group and those covering less than six cycles/six months were excluded. In addition, unlicensed products or those not internationally available, emergency contraception, and vasectomy studies were excluded.
RESULTS: Information was identified and extracted from 139 studies. One-year Pearl Indices reported for short-acting user-dependent hormonal methods were generally less than 2.5. Gross life-table rates for long-acting hormonal methods (implants and the levonorgestrel releasing-intrauterine system [LNG-IUS]) generally ranged between 0-0.6 per 100 at one year, but wider ranges (0.1-1.5 per 100) were observed for the copper intrauterine devices (0.1-1.4 per 100 for Cu-IUDs with surface area > or =300 mm( 2 ) and 0.6-1.5 per 100 for those with surface area <300 mm( 2 )). Barrier and natural methods were the least effective.
CONCLUSIONS: Our review broadly confirms the hierarchy of contraceptive effectiveness in descending order as: (1) female sterilisation, long-acting hormonal contraceptives (LNG-IUS and implants); (2) Cu-IUDs with > or =300 mm( 2 ) surface area; (3) Cu-IUDs with <300 mm( 2 ) surface area and short-acting hormonal contraceptives (injectables, oral contraceptives, the patch and vaginal ring), and (4) barrier methods and natural methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20136566     DOI: 10.3109/13625180903427675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1362-5187            Impact factor:   1.848


  20 in total

1.  Implementation of the harmonized EU isotretinoin Pregnancy Prevention Programme: a questionnaire survey among European regulatory agencies.

Authors:  Ineke Crijns; Sabine Straus; Michiel Luteijn; Christine Gispen-de Wied; June Raine; Lolkje de Jong-van den Berg
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Choosing a combined oral contraceptive pill.

Authors:  Mary Stewart; Kirsten Black
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2015-02-02

3.  Hormonal contraception--what kind, when, and for whom?

Authors:  Inka Wiegratz; Christian J Thaler
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Matched-pairs analysis of ovarian suppression during oral vs. vaginal hormonal contraceptive use.

Authors:  Kelsey A Petrie; Anu H Torgal; Carolyn L Westhoff
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Clinical versus laboratory screening for sexually transmitted infections prior to insertion of intrauterine contraception among women living with HIV/AIDS: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Othman Kakaire; Josaphat Kayogoza Byamugisha; Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Pharmacokinetics of sulfobutylether-beta-cyclodextrin and voriconazole in patients with end-stage renal failure during treatment with two hemodialysis systems and hemodiafiltration.

Authors:  Verena Hafner; David Czock; Jürgen Burhenne; Klaus-Dieter Riedel; Jürgen Bommer; Gerd Mikus; Christoph Machleidt; Thomas Weinreich; Walter E Haefeli
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Alternative Insertion Site of Nexplanon: Description of a Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Guglielmo Stabile; Carmelina Foti; Denise Mordeglia; Davide De Santo; Francesco Paolo Mangino; Antonio Simone Laganà; Giuseppe Ricci
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Can an electronic health record system be used for preconception health optimization?

Authors:  Heather Straub; Marci Adams; Richard K Silver
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-11

9.  The wandering Mirena: laparoscopic retrieval.

Authors:  Mark Erian; Glenda McLaren; David Baartz
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 10.  Multipurpose prevention technologies: biomedical tools to prevent HIV-1, HSV-2, and unintended pregnancies.

Authors:  Andrea Ries Thurman; Meredith R Clark; Gustavo F Doncel
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.