Literature DB >> 20135326

Predation and infanticide influence ideal free choice by a parrot occupying heterogeneous tropical habitats.

Timothy C Bonebrake1, Steven R Beissinger.   

Abstract

The ideal free distribution (IFD) predicts that organisms will disperse to sites that maximize their fitness based on availability of resources. Habitat heterogeneity underlies resource variation and influences spatial variation in demography and the distribution of populations. We relate nest site productivity at multiple scales measured over a decade to habitat quality in a box-nesting population of Forpus passerinus (green-rumped parrotlets) in Venezuela to examine critical IFD assumptions. Variation in reproductive success at the local population and neighborhood scales had a much larger influence on productivity (fledglings per nest box per year) than nest site or female identity. Habitat features were reliable cues of nest site quality. Nest sites with less vegetative cover produced greater numbers of fledglings than sites with more cover. However, there was also a competitive cost to nesting in high-quality, low-vegetative cover nest boxes, as these sites experienced the most infanticide events. In the lowland local population, water depth and cover surrounding nest sites were related with F. passerinus productivity. Low vegetative cover and deeper water were associated with lower predation rates, suggesting that predation could be a primary factor driving habitat selection patterns. Parrotlets also demonstrated directional dispersal. Pairs that changed nest sites were more likely to disperse from poor-quality nest sites to high-quality nest sites rather than vice versa, and juveniles were more likely to disperse to, or remain in, the more productive of the two local populations. Parrotlets exhibited three characteristics fundamental to the IFD: habitat heterogeneity within and between local populations, reliable habitat cues to productivity, and active dispersal to sites of higher fitness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20135326      PMCID: PMC2871107          DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1566-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  13 in total

Review 1.  Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection.

Authors:  Douglas W Morris
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  The role of local populations within a landscape context: defining and classifying sources and sinks.

Authors:  Jonathan P Runge; Michael C Runge; James D Nichols
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences.

Authors:  Jeremy M Davis; Judy A Stamps
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Neighborhood analyses of canopy tree competition along environmental gradients in New England forests.

Authors:  Charles D Canham; Michael J Papaik; María Uriarte; William H McWilliams; Jennifer C Jenkins; Mark J Twery
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Migration dynamics for the ideal free distribution.

Authors:  Ross Cressman; Vlastimil Krivan
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  The ideal free pike: 50 years of fitness-maximizing dispersal in Windermere.

Authors:  Thrond O Haugen; Ian J Winfield; L Asbjørn Vøllestad; Janice M Fletcher; J Ben James; Nils Chr Stenseth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Habitat choice in predator-prey systems: spatial instability due to interacting adaptive movements.

Authors:  Peter A Abrams
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Neighborhood effects and size-asymmetric competition in a tree plantation varying in diversity.

Authors:  Catherine Potvin; Pierre Dutilleul
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Demographic origins of skewed operational and adult sex ratios: perturbation analyses of two-sex models.

Authors:  Sophie Veran; Steven R Beissinger
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Living in a ghetto within a local population: an empirical example of an ideal despotic distribution.

Authors:  Daniel Oro
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.499

View more
  1 in total

1.  Opposing selection and environmental variation modify optimal timing of breeding.

Authors:  Corey E Tarwater; Steven R Beissinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.