Literature DB >> 20135218

Mercury concentrations in tidal marsh sparrows and their use as bioindicators in Delaware Bay, USA.

Sarah E Warner1, W Gregory Shriver, Margaret A Pepper, Robert J Taylor.   

Abstract

Mercury (Hg) contamination from industrial sources is pervasive throughout North America and is recognized by the US Environmental Protection Agency as a health hazard for wildlife and humans. Avian species are commonly used as bioindicators of Hg because they are sensitive to contaminants in the environment and are relatively easy to sample. However, it is important to select the appropriate avian species to use as a bioindicator, which should be directly related to the project objectives. In this study, we tested the utility of two tidal marsh sparrows, Seaside (Ammodramus maritimus) and Saltmarsh (Ammodramus caudacutus) sparrows, as bioindicator species of the extent of Hg contamination in tidal marshes along the Delaware Bay. To determine the possibility of using one or both of these species, we estimated sparrow blood Hg burden in five Delaware watersheds. We found no difference in Hg concentrations between species (F (1,133) < 0.01, P=0.99), but Saltmarsh Sparrows had limited sample size from each site and were, therefore, not appropriate for a Delaware Bay-wide Hg indicator. Seaside Sparrows, however, were abundant and relatively easy to sample in the five watersheds. Seaside Sparrow blood Hg levels ranged from 0.15 to 2.12 ppm, differed among drainages, and were greatest in two drainages distant from the Delaware Bay shoreline (F (4,95) =2.51, P=0.05). Based on a power analysis for Seaside Sparrow blood Hg, we estimated that 16 samples would be necessary to detect differences among sites. Based on these data, we propose that Seaside Sparrows may be used as a tidal marsh Hg bioindicator species given their habitat specificity, relative abundance, widespread distribution in marsh habitats, ease of sampling, and limited variation in blood Hg estimates within a sampling area. In Delaware Bay, Saltmarsh Sparrows may be too rare (making them difficult to sample) to be a viable tidal marsh Hg bioindicator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20135218     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1312-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  25 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring the response to changing mercury deposition.

Authors:  Robert P Mason; Michael L Abbott; R A Bodaly; O Russell Bullock; Charles T Driscoll; David Evers; Steven E Lindberg; Michael Murray; Edward B Swain
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  The American dipper as a bioindicator of selenium contamination in a coal mine-affected stream in west-central Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Mark Wayland; Jeff Kneteman; Robert Crosley
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Effects of mercury exposure on the reproductive success of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor).

Authors:  Rebecka L Brasso; Daniel A Cristol
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Mercury correlations among six tissues for four waterbird species breeding in San Francisco Bay, California, USA.

Authors:  Collin A Eagles-Smith; Joshua T Ackerman; Terrence L Adelsbach; John Y Takekawa; A Keith Miles; Robin A Keister
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Sulfate-reducing bacteria: principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment.

Authors:  G C Compeau; R Bartha
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Polychlorinated biphenyl- and mercury-associated alterations on benthic invertebrate community structure in a contaminated salt marsh in southeast Georgia.

Authors:  M T Horne; N J Finley; M D Sprenger
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Clapper rails as indicators of mercury and PCB bioavailability in a Georgia saltmarsh system.

Authors:  J C Cumbee; K F Gaines; G L Mills; N Garvin; W L Stephens; J M Novak; I L Brisbin
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  The movement of aquatic mercury through terrestrial food webs.

Authors:  Daniel A Cristol; Rebecka L Brasso; Anne M Condon; Rachel E Fovargue; Scott L Friedman; Kelly K Hallinger; Adrian P Monroe; Ariel E White
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Microbial pollution in wildlife: Linking agricultural manuring and bacterial antibiotic resistance in red-billed choughs.

Authors:  Guillermo Blanco; Jesús A Lemus; Javier Grande
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 6.498

10.  Distribution and accumulation of mercury in tissues of captive-reared common loon (Gavia immer) chicks.

Authors:  Kevin P Kenow; Michael W Meyer; Randy K Hines; William H Karasov
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.742

View more
  4 in total

1.  Mercury in swamp sparrows (Melospiza georgiana) from wetland habitats in Wisconsin.

Authors:  Sean M Strom; Ryan S Brady
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Mercury in breeding saltmarsh sparrows (Ammodramus caudacutus caudacutus).

Authors:  Oksana P Lane; Kathleen M O'Brien; David C Evers; Thomas P Hodgman; Andrew Major; Nancy Pau; Mark J Ducey; Robert Taylor; Deborah Perry
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Songbirds as sentinels of mercury in terrestrial habitats of eastern North America.

Authors:  Allyson K Jackson; David C Evers; Evan M Adams; Daniel A Cristol; Collin Eagles-Smith; Samuel T Edmonds; Carrie E Gray; Bart Hoskins; Oksana P Lane; Amy Sauer; Timothy Tear
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Mercury in Feathers and Blood of Gulls from the Southern Baltic Coast, Poland.

Authors:  Emilia Szumiło-Pilarska; Lucyna Falkowska; Agnieszka Grajewska; Włodzimierz Meissner
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 2.520

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.