Literature DB >> 20135072

Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in hospitalised medically ill patients. The ENDORSE Global Survey.

Jean-Francois Bergmann1, Alexander T Cohen, Victor F Tapson, Samuel Z Goldhaber, Ajay K Kakkar, Bruno Deslandes, Wei Huang, Frederick A Anderson.   

Abstract

Limited data are available regarding the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE prophylaxis use in hospitalised medically ill patients. We analysed data from the global ENDORSE survey to evaluate VTE risk and prophylaxis use in this population according to diagnosis, baseline characteristics, and country. Data on patient characteristics, VTE risk, and prophylaxis use were abstracted from hospital charts. VTE risk and prophylaxis use were evaluated according to the 2004 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify factors associated with use of ACCP-recommended prophylaxis. Data were evaluated for 37,356 hospitalised medical patients across 32 countries. VTE risk varied according to medical diagnosis, from 31.2% of patients with gastrointestinal/hepatobiliary diseases to 100% of patients with acute heart failure, active non-infectious respiratory disease, or pulmonary infection (global rate, 41.5%). Among those at risk for VTE, ACCP-recommended prophylaxis was used in 24.4% haemorrhagic stroke patients and 40-45% of cardiopulmonary disease patients (global rate, 39.5%). Large differences in prophylaxis use were observed among countries. Markers of disease severity, including central venous catheters, mechanical ventilation, and admission to intensive care units, were strongly associated with use of ACCP-recommended prophylaxis. In conclusion, VTE risk varies according to medical diagnosis. Less than 40% of at-risk hospitalised medical patients receive ACCP-recommended prophylaxis. Prophylaxis use appears to be associated with disease severity rather than medical diagnosis. These data support the necessity to improve implementation of available guidelines for evaluating VTE risk and providing prophylaxis to hospitalised medical patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20135072     DOI: 10.1160/TH09-09-0667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  22 in total

1.  IBD: postoperative VTE prophylaxis in IBD.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Nguyen
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Has time come for the use of direct oral anticoagulants in the extended prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients? No.

Authors:  Francesco Marongiu; Doris Barcellona
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Evaluation of venous thromboembolism risk following hospitalization.

Authors:  Sheryl J Herner; Dwight C Paulson; Thomas Delate; Daniel M Witt; Thomas G Vondracek
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Standard or extended-duration prophylaxis in medical patients? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  J E Stark; W J Smith
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Patients admitted with acute abdominal conditions are at high risk for venous thromboembolism but often fail to receive adequate prophylaxis.

Authors:  Emily A Pearsall; Ujash Sheth; Darlene S Fenech; Margaret E McKenzie; J Charles Victor; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Improved utilisation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in renal-impaired patients following a clinical pharmacist intervention.

Authors:  Naemeh Nikvarz; Zahra Seyedi
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2019-12-11

7.  Is guideline-driven prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism common practice in the South African private hospital setting?

Authors:  Melissa Van der Merwe; Marlene Julyan; Jesslee M Du Plessis
Journal:  S Afr Fam Pract (2004)       Date:  2020-10-12

8.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline implementation is improved by nurse directed feedback and audit.

Authors:  Harry Gibbs; John Fletcher; Peter Blombery; Renea Collins; David Wheatley
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2011-04-05

9.  Venous thromboembolism risk & prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE), a multinational cross-sectional study: results from the Indian subset data.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Pinjala
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Rate of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism during the care continuum in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the United States.

Authors:  Alpesh N Amin; Jay Lin; Stephen Thompson; Daniel Wiederkehr
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.