Literature DB >> 20134220

[The effects of two different fixation methods on femoral bone tunnel enlargement and clinical results in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft].

Bekir Murat Cinar1, Sercan Akpinar, Murat Ali Hersekli, Mustafa Uysal, Necip Cesur, Ayşin Pourbagher, Alihan Derincek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effects of anatomic and non-anatomic tunnel fixations on femoral tunnel widening and clinical results in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 35 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon graft. Fixation was performed in the tunnel using the transcondylar RigidFix pin (group 1) in 18 patients (mean age 32 years), and from outside the tunnel using the EndoButton-CL device (group 2) in 17 patients (mean age 30 years). The patients were assessed using the IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) and Lysholm knee scores and tunnel widening was assessed by computed tomography. Ligament laxity was measured bilaterally using the Rolimeter knee tester. The mean follow-up was 24 months (range 21 to 38 months) in group 1, and 24.6 months (range 12 to 36 months) in group 2.
RESULTS: The two groups were similar with respect to age and sex distribution, operated side, the size of the tunnel created, and follow-up period (p>0.05). Postoperative knee scores did not show a significant difference (p>0.05). There was marked and excessive tunnel enlargement in 14 patients (77.8%) in group 1, and in 15 patients (88.2%) in group 2, with no significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). Ligament laxity exceeded 3 mm in eight patients (44.4%) in group 1, and in three patients (17.7%) in group 2 (p<0.001). There was no relationship between tunnel widening and ligament laxity (p>0.05; r=0.175 and r=-0.01 for group 1 and group 2, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that differences in the localization of the tunnel fixation have no effect on tunnel enlargement and that joint laxity may be affected by biomechanical properties of fixation materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20134220     DOI: 10.3944/AOTT.2009.515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc        ISSN: 1017-995X            Impact factor:   1.511


  4 in total

1.  Comparison between hamstring autograft and free tendon Achilles allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using EndoButton and Intrafix.

Authors:  Jung Ho Noh; Seung Rim Yi; Sang Jun Song; Seong Wan Kim; Woo Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparisons of femoral tunnel enlargement in 169 patients between single-bundle and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon grafts.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Kawaguchi; Eiji Kondo; Nobuto Kitamura; Shuken Kai; Masayuki Inoue; Kazunori Yasuda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A medium to long-term follow-up of ACL reconstruction using double gracilis and semitendinosus grafts.

Authors:  Andrea Ferretti; Edoardo Monaco; Silvio Giannetti; Ludovico Caperna; David Luzon; Fabio Conteduca
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Tunnel Enlargement and Coalition After Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autografts: A Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Kawaguchi; Eiji Kondo; Jun Onodera; Nobuto Kitamura; Tsukasa Sasaki; Tomonori Yagi; Kazunori Yasuda
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2013-05-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.